OlderFri, 29 August 2008 at 7:57 pm
Sienna Miller Rocks Baggy Jeans
Just like Katie!
British actress Sienna Miller strolls through central London rocking the baggy jeans look on Friday.
Sienna, 26, recently responded to all of the attention she’s received, saying, “When I’m not working, I want to be myself. I don’t have assistants, bodyguards or even a driver because I try to pretend in my own head that this isn’t happening.”
She continued, “I think a lot of actresses live in this cotton wool world but I’m very free-spirited and I want to be able to live the life I do. I was well known before I had a film out but I don’t court attention. I don’t go to other people’s premieres. I haven’t been out to a club in London for years.”
Years Sienna?
10+ pictures of Sienna Miller rocking baggy jeans…
Share This Post:
84 Comments
….SOS!!!!!!!!
MESSAGE TO THE MODERATOR:
SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH THIS PAGE I HAVE TRIED TO POST COMMENTS AND THEY JUST DONT SHOW UP!!!
I THAN TRY AGAIN AND A MESSAGE COMES UP THAT I HAVE SAID THAT BEFORE WHICH ISN”T THE CASE BECAUSE IT HAS NEVER BEEN POSTED!!
She is by far one of the least interesting celebrities out there, yet she keeps being shoved in our face. At least she has clothes on, because really, her nudity does nothing for me. Although I’m glad she’s covered up, I don’t care what she’s wearing…she’s not particularly all that fashion forward, in my opinion; I don’t care if she screws Getty, if she wants to be with his lying a s s; I don’t care if he screws her, if he’s cool with being near her scuzzy a s s.
All I care about in respect to these 2 is that Rosetta gets everything and gets even (you know, I would laugh my a s s off if she sent Sienna a warning through the tabs, that she better watch out…but nah, Rosetta obviously has too much class to do that…and I’m cool with it), and that Sienna and Getty eventually just disappear into reality star oblivion.
You Sienna defenders lover her for the most superficial of reasons: She’s pretty. She’s got style. She’s carefree (yeah she’s that all right). None of you can say she is a kind, caring person who has helped people in so many ways. NOT ONE!!!! Because it isn’t true. She uses her beauty to cause others pain. She relishes it. She is a mean, nasty person. What kind of a society would we be if we didn’t hate that kind of person.
BTW, the Getty’s were married at the time of her little naked romp. Only Sienna’s “friends” have said they were seperated. How would they know?
She is a no talent ***** who is going to be doing douche commercials before long. Everyone hates her, and everyone should. She has NO career left.
To #54
Balthazar and wife were NOT already separated. This was a pathetic atempt by Baltazar and Miller’s PR teams to try and head off the heat their careers might take over this.
Of course Sienna I’m sure did not care if they got caught because she WANTED to make sure he could not go back to his wife. Both of them are disgusting.
To 69, 70, 73:
What’s funny is that you keep reading my posts!!!!! Stop complaining about how long they are when it’s more than obvious that you are taking the time/effort to read them.
I think the better question should be, why are you defending a woman who takes out HER INSECURITIES ABOUT HERSELF on other woman by sleeping with their boyfriends and husbands? You should not be proud of defending SM because only someone LACKING COMPASSION would be proud of the fact that she interfered in an 8 year marriage just to “upstage” a mother of 4 who was supporting her recovering heroin addict /alcoholic husband. You must be defending SM because you are either 1) a mistress/the other woman 2) her mother, PR team/”friends”, or SM herself, or 3) a pre-teen/teen that has no understanding about how relationships work(including divorces/separations).
You would be more credible in your defense of SM, if you didn’t try to make SM out to be a victim(or reduce/diminish her role in the affair) and brand anyone that speaks out about her antics with the NOT YET DIVORCED/LEGALLY SEPARATED MARRIED MAN as “jealous”, “a hater”, “has issues”, “bitter”, or “cheated on/dumped”. Why is it that you SM defenders always resort to NAME CALLING or INSULTS when you can not come up with valid points to support SM? Could it be that even you can not identify any redeemable qualities in SM? I neither hate nor am I jealous of SM, I’m just tried of SM and her defenders always trying to make her into a victim and blame others for her bad behavior and poor decisions. Since she didn’t say “no” to the married man with 4 kids, she is EQUALLY responsible for the affair and the pain/stress on RG/kids. No matter how much you try to spin it, no one is going to pat SM on the back and give her a free pass for sleeping with a married man and flaunting it.
People who don’t condone cheating are not the ones with “issues”. Believe it or not, many mothers & fathers actually teach their daughters/sons to not cross boundaries with married/engaged people or others girlfriends &boyfriends. Cheating is not cute/amusing, especially when children are involved. The problem are those people who continue to “worship” SM ignoring that this girl is so insecure and her self-esteem is so low that she would compete with a MOTHER OF 4 for a man. The problem are those people who say that SM didn’t do anything wrong because no one got hurt or that she wasn’t the one that took marriage vows. The problem are those people who keep claming that SM is a victim of double standards, while turning a blind out to the fact that 5 people were hurt in SM pursuit of a married man. The problem are those people who keep reciting SM’s mantra, “…but they were separated” (FYI- A separation is not a divorce and a marriage ends when the divorce is FINAL, so SM is BG’s mistress). The problem are those people that keep trying to turn this affair into a “romance”, as if being “in love” justifies SM behavior with a married man. The problem are those people who didn’t see any harm in SM posing naked/topless with the NOT YET DIVORCED/LEGALLY SEPARATED MARRIED MAN.
LEAVE SM ALONE? How bought you tell SM to leave us, the public, alone. We wouldn’t know anything about SM affair with BG, if SM hadn’t flaunted her affair with the NOT YET DIVORCED/LEGALLY SEPARATED MARRIED MAN via photo-ops and nonsense PR stories . If she had continued to lay low instead of following the married man to LA, do you think that any of us would be here writing on this board? She followed the married man to Italy and LA because she thought that she was being “upstaged” by the mother of 4 and she “had to put the mother of 4 in her place” [by having photo-ops of her allowing him to grab/suck her breast, naked/topless, shopping, eating, kissing, and lunching with the married man and releasing PR stories about her living, house hunting, and 'being happy and in love with the married man"]. It’s quite simple. If SM wants privacy, then she should STOP the photo-ops and PR stories. Since SM only feels good about herself when she is huritng another woman, she will never stop releasing these photo-ops and PR stories.
PS: SM had to get a married man drunk and take off her clothes just to make the married man interested in her just so that she can feel needed or important; therfore, she is not worthy of admiration or respect. If my posts contained 5,000 characters of “I love SM, she is so pretty, she is such a good actress, SM is not guilty of having an affair with a married man” you wouldn’t even have a problem with the length of my posts. You are only complaining because you are upset that I have more compassion for RG/her kids than a woman who sleeps with another’s woman’s HUSBAND. Once again if my posts are too long, then DON’T READ THEM.
http://picture.belga.be/belgapicture/editorial/all/gallery/563671.html
more details of the shameless fest in Italy.
To C2 #80.
I stand by my previous comment. I didn’t read it (I only read the first line)
But I agree with the other posts…too much information!
To # 82
AND I TOO STAND BY MY ORIGINAL POST ADDRESSED TO YOU(# 62):
Since you couldn’t come up with a decent thing to say about your idol, you resorted to trying to change the subject and insult me by telling me how much I can write in my post(s). Are you the moderator? I thought not. Since you are not the moderator and there is a 5,000 character limit, you have NO AUTHORITY to tell me how much I can write in my post(s). If you don’t like how long my posts are, then DON’T READ THEM WHEN YOU SEE MY NAME. Just like SM, you could have avoided the situation. Just like SM you just couldn’t resist the opportunity to blame others.You are entitled to like SM, just don’t be offended/surprised that the majority of people don’t feel the same way as you. How are we supposed to respect SM, when she doesn’t even respect herself or other women for that matter?”
You could have AVOIDED this situation by SIMPLY NOT READING MY POST WHEN YOU SAW MY NAME. Please don’t respond to me telling me that you ONLY read just the first sentence of post #80 because it “was too much information”, when it is more than obvious that you have read the entire post. The only reason that you agree with “# 69,70,73″ is because YOU also wrote those posts. Trying to change the subject or resorting to name calling/insults won’t make people feel any sympathy/compassion for SM or forget that SM IS AND WAS HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH A NOT YET DIVORCED/LEGALLY SEPARATED MARRIED MAN.
I hate people who describe themselves as “free-spirited”. Typically, their idea of being a free-spirit involves ******** people over in childish displays of self-destruction. They are never half as origianl as they think they are. Sienna is basically mimicking Elizabeth Taylor did but without the unusual beauty, charisma, wit, trail-blazing behaviour, and occasional great performance.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!