Top Stories

Sarah Palin Didn’t Give Birth To Down Syndrome Baby?

Sarah Palin Didn’t Give Birth To Down Syndrome Baby?

On Friday, it was announced that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was chosen to be Republican presidential nominee John McCain’s running mate. The 44-year-old Idaho-native claimed to be the mother of five children, the youngest of whom was diagnosed with Down Syndrome. Palin’s decision to have the baby was applauded by the pro-life community.

Here’s some new evidence Daily Kos has brought forward, showing Sarah Palin is not the mother of four-month-old Trig:

– On March 6th, Sarah announced she’s seven month pregnant. Even close members of her staff were surprised.

– Her water broke one month before Trig was due, but she kept a previous speaking engagement in Texas and then flew 8 hours to Alaska. No one on board noticed that Sarah was going into labor either. The flight lands in Anchorage, Alaska. Instead of visiting a medical facility that can accommodate a premature birth in Alaska’s most equipped city, she drives 45 minutes away to Mat-Su Regional Medical Center, right outside the small village she used to govern as Mayor, Wasilla.

– On April 18, 2008, Trig was born one month premature. Sarah returned to work after three days. (Trig was diagnosed with Down syndrome while still in the womb.)

Trig is not Sarah’s son, but grandson. It was her 16-year-old daughter Bristol (pictured right) who was carrying. (80% of the cases of Down Syndrome are in mothers under the age of 35.)

– Family had taken Bristol out of Anchorage High School due to contracting “infectious mononucleosis”. Reports say she was absent from school for five to eight months. Mono can last anywhere from two weeks to three months.

To read all of the incriminating evidence “proving” Palin is a liar, visit DailyKos.com.

Methinks Diddy has enough ammo for another verbal lashing in vlog #17! (Watch #16 here.)

UPDATE 1: The Associated Press has released an undated photo of a pregnant Palin, probably with her first child. And for kicks, this photo manip is so clever! This scandal is just calling out for Tina Fey to return to SNL to spoof all of this.

UPDATE 2: DailyKos posted a picture of Palin with what appears to be a baby bump. Check it out here.

JJ Links Around The Web

  • Nancy O'Dell leaves Access Hollywood - PopEater
  • Jude Law miscounts his kids on Letterman - PopSugar
  • Jessica Biel wraps The A-Team and heads home - LaineyGossip
  • Beyonce's parents may be getting divorced - Dlisted
  • Taylor Lautner gears up for Cancun - JustJaredJr
  • Fran Drescher goes for a swim - TheSuperficial
  • Demi Moore poses with a giraffe - Celebuzz
Frederick Breedon/Getty

598 Comments

Pages: « 117 18 19 [20] 21 22 2324 » Show All

Please pray for this crazy liar and her ****** daughter.

Even Sarah Palin conceived her first child while she was not married, so the olive doesn’t fall far from the martini glass.

What worries me, as a Christian, is that Palin obviously places more importance on her raw ambition than her children.

Shame on her!

bet betty @ 09/01/2008 at 1:12 am

Hmmmm…..

Actually I think the lie out there which was set to hurt Palin is gonna backfire on the democrats.

The right will be united and the independants like me will be disgusted by the crats.

Well done, Crats!

Another reason why I don’t support McCain–Palin team. A bunch of liars and idiots.

“Most of you are just prejudice as he!! that’s the true reason you will not vote for Obama. Racism still is big in America. You would rather see the country go to the pits by lying a$$ republicans than vote for a black man.”

—-

oh god. becuase that would be the only reason to vote mccain right

Wow, fairy tales now.
Anyone who believes this is a complete moron.
Simple way to check, The OBGYN keeps records.
Paternity is easy to establish

Way to be a champ. Why don’t you try focusing on supporting your candidate as opposed to demeaning the opposing team? I don’t know if this is true. I doubt it, but either way, can you grow up please?

vicki Pasadena, CA @ 09/01/2008 at 2:02 am

The picture is 2 years old and was published in the Anchorage papers in 2006

innonminedei #26

Just because you have a source cited does not mean the source is legitimate. He obviously is favoring obama, that is seen because he is bashing Palin and there is no negative post towards the opposition. Voting is indeed a personal choice, so keep it personal and do not go out of your way to force other people to believe your way (which he unfortunately probably has because ignorant people will read this blog as fact). “both sides should know more about the ppl running for the offices… be those infos malicious, truthful, patriotic or whatever… these are the things that give us an idea of the kind of ppl they are” uh, are you serious? both sides SHOULD know the candidates but they definitely SHOULD knowTRUTH. If people spew untruthful information all over the media (which they do) then we don’t REALLY know the candidates, dumbass. No need for personal attacks at all, so why did Jared post this personal petty attack on Palin? Ignorant people like you all over inspire me.

I can’t believe how many stupid Republican fucktards post on your site!!!

sleeping Giant @ 09/01/2008 at 2:10 am

McCain should have picked Huckabee.. Enuff said… Huckabee was a good man, a staunch conservative and he had the executive experience being a governor. Huckabee was the best choice….Sighsz.

Happy 3RD Anniversary (1 Sept)
….to Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens….
Live In Love Zanessa!

JESSE1562 @ 09/01/2008 at 2:27 am

I understand why #457 is so upset. There are some real hateful comments being posted, but it is the season once again when politics brings it out. I am glad this is being aired. I hadn’t heard the story and to be honest I like to see it exposed.
We have had supremisists posting hate flyers on our cars stating that to vote for Obama is wrong and unChristian. Just like some of the religious nut jobs are now trying to turn Palin into a Saint for having a Downs baby. She isn’t a saint because she went through with it. Democrats and Republicans alike make this choice to have these children. It isn’t just one set of politics and supporting Obama isn’t a vote for baby killers, so cut it out.
If she lied, she is a liar and therefore a risk politically to the country.
If the Republicans know she lied then they are covering it up, and just playing the voters as idiots. I think putting in a token inexperienced woman with a 4 month old special needs child was a cheep trick anyway. I work with special needs children. That baby does not need mommy distracted.
I was fine with Hilary Clinton in office with her attention on us in the office, and if it were a new father of a special needs child I would have the same problem too. Parents of newborn special needs children have all sorts of problems, so it isn’t just about who gave birth. It is who is going to tend to the needs. Downs children have unique needs and are more prone to high instances of health problems in the first years of life. That means distractions too. Mother or father, this is not the best time for her to be in a presidential position–she should step down and go for it at a later time. If she really is about the child and now about selfish pursuits.
I want leaders who are focused on the needs of the country, get us back on track, because the current leadership has really messed things up terribly. Focus!

Yes, and ALIENS FROM PLANET X are the real father!

Seriously, learn the dates of the photos, then kill yourself to prevent your genes from spreading to the next generation.

groundcontrol @ 09/01/2008 at 2:45 am

cc @ 09/01/2008 at 12:24 am Does this look like an 8 months pregnant woman who’s pregnant with her 5th child? lol i think not.

http://www.adn.com/politics/story/339576.html

###############

cc, if you’re going to participate in this ridiculous discussion then at least get your facts accurate. It’s bad enough that people feel entitled to make things up - don’t make it worse by misreporting pictures.

The picture in your link clearly states that it was taken on SUPER TUESDAY. That was February 5, 2008. That is ten and a half weeks before she gave birth to her son on April 18, 2008.

If she was due in mid May then she was 24 - 25 weeks pregnant in that picture. That’s 6 months pregnant and yes she looks about 6 months pregnant in that picture.

Good god now I am part of this stupid discussion.

This post showcases the woefully deficient analytical skills of the American public, beginning with the owner of this blog.

Sad, really.

I do not care whether she had the baby or chose to protect her daughter from the stigma of having a baby at 16. Go Palin!

I thought the dem talking points was that she had a downs baby because she didn’t take care of herself?

let's all take a deep breath @ 09/01/2008 at 3:18 am

I am a Democrat, and I have to say that unless anyone has real proof, this sort of trajectory is not right. I can understand why Republicans would not like his post. Also, let’s not post Diddy’s response to anything as it is not worth beans. He is just one voice and frankly makes Democrats look less than tolerant, or really anything positive.

I think JJ has a right to post what he wants, as it is his blog, but hopefully we can all agree to not spread this as fact in other channels as it just doesn’t make sense to. It will make everyone look bad if it proves not to be true, and if it does become official truth, then the truth will also take care of the matter.

HERE IS A PICTURE OF PALIN FIVE DAYS BEFORE SHE GAVE BIRTH. THE LIBERAL WINGNUTS WILL INSIST THAT’S A PILLOW UNDER HER DRESS.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3049/2814199887_67e84850f4.jpg?v=0

GUESS WHERE I GOT THIS PICTURE?
FROM DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND.

Sarah Palin is remarkable strong woman. She can balance the needs of motherhood and career. We need more women like her.

Go Sarah go! You are a model to all women!

OMG! SARAH WAS PREGNANT, AND WASILLA ISN’T A VILLAGE. THE MAT-SU REGIONAL IS A LARGE HOSPITAL THAT IS QUITE CAPABLE OF TAKING CARE OF PREMATURE BABIES! THIS IS A LAUGH! ESPECIALLY TO ALL OF US WHO LIVE IN ALASKA!

you and me @ 09/01/2008 at 5:03 am

There is no proof or smoking gun to prove this. She might of collaborated the birth of her some to make it more appealing, but her having another child would be consistent with part of her moral views.

There has been outstanding work done by her supports to clean up her image. It is hard to determine whether she supports the use of contraception or abstinence only sex education.

Either her image is contrived or there are attempts being made to make her less appealing. Unless there is proof, we should be more concerned with the other less palatable beliefs that she has.

She may have done it to help her daughter, but it is stil cheating, dishonest and lying to the voters. It’s a bigger, more fraudulent lie than denying a little oral sex, IMHO.
True or not, I don’t like her at all. There are many more republican candidates more exerienced and qualified than she is (both male and female), but they are not former beauty queens.

While I can understand she wanted to help her teenage daughter, she shouldn’t have lied about this. It is not right.
And also think it is wrong that she thinks that woman who are raped shouldn’t have abortions. I’m pro life too, but I wouldn’t want my wife, daughter, sister or any woman or girl be forced to go through a pregnancy, labour and childbirth in that situation. Being raped is already bad enough.

Don’t care what happen to Palin or whether the story is true or bogus. Republicans always gonna get my vote. That’s it.

this is a joke, the “small village” is Wasilla, and it is not a village, it is one of Alaska’s fastest growing cities. and Mat-Su regional is not 25 miles away from Wasilla. and, Mat-su Regional is not a small Hospital, it is a large and much needed Hospital, that is quite capable of taking care of pre-mature babies! and yes, Palin was pregnant. i can’t believe this story even came about.

Pages: « 117 18 19 [20] 21 22 2324 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.