Jennifer Aniston Goes 30 Rock Crazy

ooks = looks
her = here
i don’t like making corrections but incase some spelling enforcers are here and tht would be likely a jp fan or fans who just loves to point other mistakes and discrepancies but fail to acknowledge there’s, and tht is pure hipocrisy, though most jp’s are very nice and intelligent posters. i am also getting tired on hearing homewrecker thing and any disgusting name the jenfans refers to angie. if most of u keep doing these, it just make everybody tht jennifer was been dumped indeed and it will forever paint her as a victim, a weak ,insecure and pitiful woman, do u want tht?i am also tired of some jp fans calling jennifer a HAG, when infact she is pretty and very young looking, and she really doesn’t look a day over 30. i don’t care ,if she did some surgical enhancement to look good. truthfully, anybody here will do tht ,if they hv tht amount of money.i also don’t believe angilina had any surgery beacuse, if she did , i am sure a lot of her detractors or those very envioused people , will do anything to bring real documents but most are just mere specualtions and can not even named the doctors. the trut is a lot of women requesting angelina jolie’s body parts and she is surgically -enhanced , why is nobody there coming to be a total replica of her?….stupidity and enviousness, let these two women live their life and u live urs.

rien @ 09/03/2008 at 8:30 am

@Modella

You know that Stephen Huvane also the PR of Jude Law, Kirsten Dunst, Gwyneth Paltrow, Helen Mirren, Ang Lee, Ewan McGregor…naming a few.

Why do you have to pick Gwyneth Paltrow up? Simply because she had a relationship with Pitt? Why you don’t try to compare Jen with Robin Givens for example? Or Juliette Lewis? (if you talk about Pitt)

Why not Kirsten Dunst, or even Helen Mirren? (If you talk about the PR)?
*******************************************************************
Do all the people you mention also known as Brad Pitt’s exes e.g. Robin Givens and Juliette Lewis also have Huvane as PR and Keshihian as manager?

who cares that she is on tv? her father was and she followed in his foot steps the same way angie followed her father in his being in movies. lots of movie actors have gone to small screen. i think it proves you have what it takes if ppl want to see you week after week. lets be honest angie could do tv if she tried, other then reality show.

The problem with Ms. Jolie now is that, she has force fed the public her private life to such an extent that it has caused her to loose her ability to become a chameleon in films, which is essential when you are an actor. Now, all you see in her films is “Angelina Jolie” and not someone who morphs into character so that you forget who they are off-screen. The reason for this, aside from extreme over-exposure, is her inability to act well. Only the best can succeed in having a large off-screen presence and still present a strong on-screen performance, such as Meryl Streep, for example. One person who also had it, and then lost it, is Tom Cruise. Now all you see when he is on film is a crazy Scientologist jumping on a couch. In the trailer of this film, and many of Jolie’s past films, the public now simply sees Brad Pitt’s crazy, homewrecking, baby collecting, baby mamma. If she would focus on her craft as much as she focuses on photo-op’s and media manipulation, she may have been able to extend her acting career but, alas, such is not the case

Errr, Jennifer is the one with a high-powered publicist and media maven in Stephen Huvane, and Angelina only has Geyer Kosinski as her manager, she has no publicist, and yet you accuse Angelina of media manipulation. Boy, she must really be some kind of superwoman, she has 6 children, is breastfeeding twins, has a sexy partner with whom she presumably has “fun” with all the time, has major humanitarian projects, reads scripts for future roles and can STILL manipulate the media and arrange photo-ops. I can only be awestruck at her energy!!!

right……..ain’t her career reaching a peak.

Linda!! simplemente linda mi querida Jen!! por suerte vamos a poder verla nuevamente en la Tv!!!! espero que pronto salga tambien una peli de Jen!! esta cada dia mas linda! gracias por las fotos!
besos

ghost @ 09/03/2008 at 10:24 pm
Oh please ghost and all of you get over this crap already, Its really getting to old. Jen and Angie and Brad are fine people, I think Bet is fine stop the tormenting and the worshipping. No one feels sorry for jen, I don’t want to fend for any of them, you know why no one gives crap what you write about them….Jens a grown woman and can handle her own life like we all do… I feel sorry for you for being so cruel with anything that comes out of your mouth. Is exactly how you treat your own family with the hashish words.
AND BET jen is just fine stop apologizing say what you feel and leave Angie and Brad out of this.. You like jen thats great. Stop the worshipping bull crap all of you. Read what you write you all sound crazy……
Don’t you think GHOST???????
Just got back from Fl to see my new grandbaby jillian raye what a beauty. Congrats to me!!!!!!!

Having to do TV shows like Britney Spears to get attention. Then the way her PR Team put it all over the Internet like people cared. Oh how the once mighty have fallen. First John Mayer, then dressing like a teenager to get attention and now TV shows in hopes of stroking her ego and scratching for fans. She has gotten so desperate these days with that birthday around the corner. What will she be……..40 yeah that’s right. Well lets hope she can calm down.

After this it will be dressing like Britney Sprears, alerting the media to please come take my picture again. Oh well life goes on, what’s a girl to do.

Cont. Greek Myth.

What you meant is Oedipus. I think like this: if the father did not ask somebody else to kill the boy (there are things that you should do it yourself to make sure that it’s done. Or what we say in German: Das Thema ist erledigt. Punkt. Ende.), then the prophecy would not happen. Or, if he did not believe it, and loved his son, as a father loves his son, then the thing would not happen either.

What we do to others, will influence us. In short future, or in the long future. That’s fate. Because King Laius did something evil, trying to kill an innocent soul, evil fate followed him too. Not because of the prophecy. He was the one who fulfilled the prophecy, by doing something evil.

rien,

LOL, it is so true. If you want things done ‘perfectly’, do it yourself. Indeed if this that won’t happen, if that this wouldn’t happen. But we can’t foresee all these consequences and often are too excited about things to ponder ‘if’.

You asked if I was talking about the 3 people or relationship in general. I replied to which ever pov you, or whomever I conversed with, put out, as I said before, am not replying on my angle solely. Any mention of the ‘dead horse’ as you referred, was instantaneously as, let’s be honest here, this ‘dead horse’ brought about our conversation one way or another, be it a pov of bet who is obviously quite sore about the dead horse. I do however try consciously to avoid making a snide remark or insinuation about them (referring to one person as armpit (I’m sure your English is good enough to understand why be use that term so I can’t see your innocence if you were replying to me and claim it was an innocent analogy)) as such immature manner would sure provoke disgruntle from the fanatic fans, something I do not wish to do simply because I can’t stand vulgarity.

You are mistaken relationship with people in that relationship. Relationship is thing, not people. It is something you value because you value people in it. At least this is my angle. It is nothing when two people separate/divorce and in its place is a new relationship (hence it is dead, nothing), a hostile one if one party choose to nurture a wound, a friendship otherwise.

Whose mistake it is in scenario you cited is not me to decide, only his wife and himself. I am sure the wife thinks it’s his. And all I did was putting out his angle theoretically as seen and heard with my own eyes and ears. It is entirely up to the wife to lay blame.Her decision is therefore, my opinion, her share of blame in the divorce if its reason is put on him. Can you see that I’m back to my original point –that the wife bears the blame if the husband cheated–now?

rien, did you decide to have comprehension problem occasionally? I said naive is a good thing, good-naturedly on my part, without any provocative hint at all. Why respond as if you were hurt?

This, and your perception that relationship is person, and the tone of your posts show me that you are sensitive. That explains your pov regarding the dead horse. And sincerely, this is fine as you can’t help being sensitive (you’re born with it).

A polygamist must treat all his wives equally? That’s what we women want. But I ask you again, and clearer this time, if you were one of those wives, would you want to be ordinary like all other wives so that he goes to your bed on schedule or would you want to be a special one to whom he can’t wait to talk to and to bed with? If your answer, with utmost honesty–the fancy novel honesty– is yes, then I applaud you. And by the way, what we say the men must doesn’t necessary become a law. If that were the case, he could do the same. After all we women wanted, fought for and got equal right to men. I’d expect we be rationalizing, behaving like men all around. Or else, why bother wanting equal right?

I do hope that when you wrote that Jolie’s films don’t need thinking you had no wish to take a swipe at her. Not that it matters to me but you have been advocating fairness in judgment. We have to walk the talk first before we ask others to do the same, and it’s hard to stay in that walk if others don’t seem to follow but as you are keen on mythology and bookish ideals (no sarcasm whatsoever here), you’d want to be an example.

My opinion on most movies nowadays is that they are boring. This is only because I am old and have seen and lived with too much of the kind of reality that turned Jolie into a humanitarian as well as other realities such as those discussed here.

I don’t hold the actor for the quality of the film and its story line. It isn’t his/her doing. She made the choice and it may be ‘bad’ because the film turns out bad, but as there are many award categories for the movie, there are as many people to blame when it goes bad.

I do judge the actor’s acting by the emotion his/her character provokes from me. If I’m stuck with the bad movie just to watch the actor then he/she has acting talent or charisma at least.

And unfortunately Aniston offers neither my definition of talent nor charisma to glue me to her movies. On top of it, I read the premises of her movies and found them depth-lacking. Again this is so because I’m old so my depth is different than yours. The same can be said about many story lines of Jolie’s movies. She, to me, has a rare charismatic presence however and a sexual appeal that I have seen on only a handful women in my life (of the movie stars E. Taylor is another). This observation does not intend to unfavorably compare these two actresses in question here because charisma and lusciousness are two things people are born with, God’s gift (or curse) of sort.

8-)