Fri, 05 September 2008 at 10:14 pm

Rachel Bilson’s Dog Days of Summer

Rachel Bilson , her dog Thurmen Murmen and a friend go to Burbank Airport in Los Angeles on Friday.

The 27-year-old actress recently spoke to Page Six Magazine and talked about her relationship with Jumper co-star Hayden Christensen.

RB broke out her strappy white and gold gladiator sandals and paired it with a casual outfit.

WHAT DO YOU THINK of RB’s gladiator sandals — JUST RIGHT or JUST WRONG?

10+ pictures inside of Rachel Bilson’s dog days of summer…

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 01

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 02

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 03

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 04

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 05

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 06

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 07

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 08

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 09

Bilson-summer rachel bilson dog days summer 10

Credit: Danielle; Photos: Bauergriffinonline
Posted to: Rachel Bilson
Related posts:

JJ Links Around The Web

Paris Hilton's on a billboard...and isn't happy - TheSuperficial
Levi Johnston and Jon Gosselin film together - Dlisted
David Beckham and Cruz sport matching 'dos - LaineyGossip
Carrie Prejean: Sex tape was "the worst mistake of my life" - PopEater
Penelope Cruz is bella in Rome - PopSugar
Taylor Lautner covers Men's Health's December issue - JustJaredJr
Check out Emma Watson's Elle Girl outtakes - Celebuzz

Photo: RHS/WENN

66 Comments

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

# 26

Ring in 2006 @ 09/06/2008 at 3:01 am

First shows up on her LEFT ring aka wedding band finger…..

http://rachel-bilson.de/gallery/displayimage.php?album=322&pos=8

during The Last Kiss promos. That’s before she even meet Hayden

@reply | Flag This

# 27

Ring in 2006 @ 09/06/2008 at 3:01 am

It’s the same ring. The exact same ring.

@reply | Flag This

# 28

s @ 09/06/2008 at 4:04 am

the latest ring she is wearing is smaller in width, but it does not mean

anything,it could be just a ring though

@reply | Flag This

# 29

ocsethummer @ 09/06/2008 at 4:43 am

When she was dating Adam she regularly wore rings on her left ring finger, sometimes it was sliver.

http://eur.i1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/xp/yahoo_manual/20060830/16/335521486.jpg

@reply | Flag This

# 30

tim @ 09/06/2008 at 4:44 am

Rachel and whoever is orchestrating her publicity need to be careful not to get her too overexposed. It’s not a good idea for an actress to be in the tabloids and mags all the time without having an actual movie to promote. She risks audiences getting tired of her and not taking her seriously as an actress. Look at Mischa Barton.

@reply | Flag This

# 31

... @ 09/06/2008 at 4:49 am

she is pregnant, and that’s why she is engaged. late news but new news

@reply | Flag This

# 32

ocsethummer @ 09/06/2008 at 4:51 am

Wearing a ring again, whilst dating Adam July 2006

http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2006/07/25/416563/RachelBilson.jpg

@reply | Flag This

# 33

Please @ 09/06/2008 at 5:00 am

Any fan of hers knows that she wears a ring on her left finger from time to time. It goes way back. This is nothing. Just people wanting to stir up drama…..again. It’s getting sickening.

@reply | Flag This

# 34

Please @ 09/06/2008 at 5:02 am

Any true fan of hers knows that she wears a ring on her left ring finger from time to time. It goes way back. It has always and still does mean nothing. Just a few people stirring up drama……again. It’s sickening.

@reply | Flag This

# 35

Please @ 09/06/2008 at 5:03 am

Sorry for the double post.

@reply | Flag This

# 36

s @ 09/06/2008 at 5:10 am

@tim

i agree with you although i think mischa is overexposed too

@reply | Flag This

# 37

Quain @ 09/06/2008 at 5:19 am

“its sickening”

Its reality. she is a celebrity. get the f**k over it. lol

you made a dumb comment.

@reply | Flag This

# 38

amaranth @ 09/06/2008 at 5:47 am

@ Tim

Agree much! I remember during OC heydays, it was all about Mischa and w/ all the media coverage plastered on her that time, just look at her now, a FREAKING JOKE MEDIA TOOL!
And with the rate thing are going, what have happened to Mischa (media-darling turned media-ho turned media-toxic) would most likely to happen w/ Bison too - you know “what goes around always come around”!

@reply | Flag This

# 39

Sam @ 09/06/2008 at 6:09 am

I love Rachel, she looks adorable in those pictures!

@reply | Flag This

# 40

Erin @ 09/06/2008 at 6:20 am

Love it. I came here 2 years ago circa The O.C and people would fawn all over her. Now it seems people have cottoned on.

It’s always been obvious she’s simply a famewhore. She shows up to every and any event. And it’s not like she’s promoting anything since she hasn’t been hired all that much. She only scores roles because of her boyfriend or good friend who used to produce the show she was on. I mean she’s cute and an ok actress but that’s it. She average in both depts and that won’t make her. So she simply pimps herself out in her godawful ’stylish’ outfits. I hate famewhores.

@reply | Flag This

# 41

blue @ 09/06/2008 at 7:25 am

@Erin

“She only scores roles because of her boyfriend or good friend who used to produce the show she was on”

Very true.
Now that there’s nothing going on with her workwise, she’s pimping out her friend’s wedding to Josh to get press. Still she claims to keep her private life private.

Next thing you know she’ll be hosting a bachelorette party in Vegas.

@reply | Flag This

# 42

:) @ 09/06/2008 at 7:30 am

PLEASE TELL ME WHERE I CAN GET THOSE SHOES

Thanks <3

@reply | Flag This

# 43

otelia @ 09/06/2008 at 7:45 am

actually i like seeing fotos of both hayden and rachel but i dont want

her getting overexposed either

@reply | Flag This

# 44

chauncey @ 09/06/2008 at 9:33 am

@ # 40

Soo awfully & damned true… that it looks like that if she cant smell even a single paparazzi, she’s going to die due to oxygen-malfunction!
Apparently she lives & breathe of what her PATRONIZED paparazzi would do for her!

@reply | Flag This

# 45

ali @ 09/06/2008 at 9:34 am

who cares if she wears a ring??? honestly it’s a ring and saying she’s wearing a ring for attention is one of the stupidest things i have heard.

@reply | Flag This

# 46

marlough @ 09/06/2008 at 10:34 am

The sad reality probably is that this average-mall-looking-chicklet has been spoiled and indulged by her enabling parents all these years to believe that she actually is “really” beautiful and talented. How WARPED!

@reply | Flag This

# 47

miss zanessa @ 09/06/2008 at 10:35 am

aWW shE´s adOrablE ^^

@reply | Flag This

# 48

verde @ 09/06/2008 at 10:47 am

She’s very pretty, but you have to have long, lean legs to pull off gladiator sandals. She’s quite petite.

@reply | Flag This

# 49

R @ 09/06/2008 at 11:46 am

I’m a Rachel fan, I do remember the ring she wore back in 2006 and it’s definitely not the same one she is wearing in these pictures. This one is smaller and the other was wider and looked closer to her skin when she wore it. I’m not saying this means anything, because obviously I have no idea, but I’m sure is not the same one.

@reply | Flag This

# 50

mia @ 09/06/2008 at 12:23 pm

i gotta say she has a great sense in fashion, but her face seriously looks like she’s been punched several times, it looks so strange and unpretty…

@reply | Flag This

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All