Katie Holmes: All My Rehearsals

& @ 09/07/2008 at 1:16 pm

Oh, you mean like having Suri before they got married? That old fashioned way?

Would somebody please tell her how STUPID she looks?

Do her sisters not tell her? Maybe they do but the cult has more influence on her than her family.

Don’t know who said it but she’s dressing her part—-streetwalking Katie. Now Tom needs to get him a fancy suit, a fancy hat, and a cane and they’ll both look the part.

She’s an A lister, #78. WHY she’s an A lister is questionable but an A lister nonetheless.

They don’t have to do anything to be considered a power couple. Juts be very popular in the media.

I thinks he looks fine #79 but I really don’t care if you disagree. Have you seen me defend Holmes against all these style attacks? I don’t care. It’s your opinion.

I’m not a Scientologist nor have ever defended Scientology. I already know about their wicked ways.

I do research alright. Research backed up by common sense and NON-tabloids.

It’s not confusing if you refer to each post by number, #86.

Marriage is just a piece of paper, #87. As long as Brangelina loves each other and their kids, what does it matter?

Also, they got together through unfortunate circumstances but you can’t criticize this loving family forever.

Wanted was still a box office hit and you can’t really pin all the success of Tropic Thunder on Cruise’s shoulders given that he only has a supporting role and he was never involved in the marketing, #88.

Why does Brangelina have to be the one releasing this story, #89? it’s a tabloid that is no celebrity’s friend.

Don’t compare kids, #90. They’re both cute in their own way.

And Brad Pitt has many friends by the way.

Right, #97.

Brad Pitt has many friends like George Clooney and Matt Damon, #99.

And IF their charitable are motivated by good PR…who cares? The well-fed, formerly starving children in Africa sure don’t. Charity is charity is charity.

Angelina Jolie was VERY famous and by no means a B lister and Pitt’s career is flying. He’s even working with freakin’ Quentin Tarantino and Terrence Malick next!

Cruise has many friends, #107.

They’re different kinds of actors. Cruise is the bigger recognizable leading man kind of star while Brad Pitt is the more versatile, supporting figure of movies.

They don’t stage photo ops. They don’t have to.

I knew you’d do that, #111. It’s not hypocrisy or mind-reading when I make claims like that red cross things. It’s just plain old common sense. I wouldn’t accuse anyone of mind-reading if the same happened to me.

Ah. You’ve been reduced to nit-picking. I don’t know if every single person from the biggest director to the smallest extra or PA has always said that he’s a great guy but the general consensus is is that he is a great guy.

You’re better than that, Mav. Please try again next time.

I was only referring ti #33’s exaggerated statement of Holmes’ unhappiness. Also, I said LOOKS and not IS. There’s a difference…

Solemn means “not cheerful or smiling; serious.”

Once again, I’ve managed to refute every single argument of yours. Better luck next time.

No one knows why his second marriage failed, #112.

How did he ‘publicly dump’ Kidman, #117? Did he call for a press conference or something? So what if he hooked up with some while he was still married? He had already filed for divorce.

Much like marriage, divorce is just a piece of paper to me. You don’t need a certificate to prove you’re in love and dedicated to each other and you don’t need another certificate to prove that you’re no longer in love and dedicated to each other.

No one knows why Kidman and Cruise broke up, #121.

And that popular wives argument makes no sense by the way.

Like you’re a supermodel, #128.

“Once again, I’ve managed to refute every single argument of yours.’

You have? Hmm. I must have missed that in the midst of all your ramblings. Let me check…

Do you mean this: “Solemn means “not cheerful or smiling; serious”?
That’s a refute? Because it sounds more like spinning semantics. Cheerful means happy, no? And “not cheerful” would mean…the opposite of that?
Of course, it would be much less complicated to just say ’sad’.

Or is it this:
“Ah. You’ve been reduced to nit-picking. I don’t know if every single person from the biggest director to the smallest extra or PA has always said that he’s a great guy but the general consensus is is that he is a great guy. ”

Creature, dear, I’m simply asking for a little proof! Surely someone like yourself who has stated time and time again that no one should claim anything is fact without proof to back it up would find fault.

“Prove it” was a direct quote I took from you. I thought you’d be honored! But if you can’t, I’ll try to find the advice you so kindly gave to others. Ah, yes, here it is—>”prove it or shut up”.

Or this:
“It’s not hypocrisy or mind-reading when I make claims like that red cross things. It’s just plain old common sense.”

So when you say that another poster on this board wouldn’t be donating to the Red Cross if he/she were rich, that’s plain old common sense? Because it kind of sounds more like an unfounded attack on someone you don’t even know to me. Not as much as when you said this: “Like you’re a supermodel, #128.” But it is an insult all the same.

Sigh…I’d say you’re better than that too if I could. Sadly, I cannot. Because you’re not better than that. You’re just as bad as everyone you try to contradict and debate, and you do everything you accuse them of. It is hypocrisy, I’m afraid, of the very worst kind.

But of all the interesting things you have to say, Creature, this one interests me most of all:

“I do research alright. Research backed up by common sense and NON-tabloids.”

Really? Do tell? And where is this investigative research carried out? Which scientific texts do you consult? Non-tabloid reports on celebrity lives are so rare to come by, that I’m intrigued to know your informative sources!

You claim you’ve refuted all my arguments, Creature, but you miraculously managed to do so without actually answering any question I posed.

Perhaps we’ll both have better luck next time, hmm?

haters will eat their own words: watch your own lives
and especially your innocent loved ones suffer
because of your ill words upon others

Jared I enjoy your posts
minus tabloid garbage

God Bless the Cruises

Adversity happens to many good people and for the time being looks like evil and bad people are winning but time is also ticking at them.
What comes around goes around. Trolls that throw stones at this celebrities who do them no harm will have consequences at their paths. Sometimes it happens tomorrow,next week, only God knows.
At times the consequences happens a long long time but you are lucky if its not death because your soul is doomed forever.
You judge this celebs but God will also judge you the same way or even harder.

I realize this is all probably part of all one person’s multiple personality disorder, but what about the poster who is always insinuating some terrible evil will befall all those who mock TomKat.

A pox on you! I’m currently finding those more amusing that the “God bless the Cruises”.

Brad and Ange donate a portion of their earnings to charities
Tom and Katie donate a portion of their earnings to a malicious cult
CASE CLOSED.

Tom Cruise pioneered adoption? Was he the first man on the moon too?

Its really neat to see jealous haters have no families aka lowlives give their all from Monday — Sunday for TomANDKatie!

What woman, #132?

All I meant was that solemn did not mean a person was as distressed as you defined it was, #133.

Are you seriously now asking me for proof that he’s generally knows as a nice guy now? You really are getting desperate. Try checking out the MILLIONS of quotes of celebrities and extras and fans who’ve met him that say he’s a nice guy! You’re pathetic.

It’s not an attack as much as it is..well, common sense! If you were a billionaire, you may or may not be stingy enough with your money not to give to charity but I think we all know that we would sure spend it on big screen TVs, cars and houses and such that we don’t need so it;s hypocritical to rag on any rich person who doesn’t donate as much as they can.

And I’m betting that disgusting people making fun of trivial things about her looks which she has no control aren’t winning any beauty pageants anytime soon.

I can’t believe you’d try to argue otherwise. It’s not really much an attack if I’m just pointing out their hypocrisy.

I’m not a hypocrite at all. You’d think after failing to prove I am about 5 times by now you’d get the point.

I follow respected entertainment news shows like E! and Access Hollywood and respected magazines like People and Entertainment Weekly. Not Life & Style or Star or inTouch or even Us and OK!

I’m not a gullible fool as well as not a hypocrite. Accept it.

What question did you EVER pose?

It was really just a lousy weekend, #138.

Right, #145. Very funny.