Wed, 10 September 2008 at 10:11 pm
Rachel Bilson: It’s a Piece of Cake!
Rachel Bilson is very animated with her hand gestures while out and about in Los Feliz, Calif., on Wednesday afternoon with her spiritual adviser mom Janice.
The 27-year-old former O.C. starlet was seen going to a few book stores before trying on some jewelry at the ‘Cake’ boutique in Los Angeles.
Rachel should be making her way east to the big Apple for New York Fashion Week soon.
Green wayfarer sunglasses by Chanel.








Older









102 Comments
P. S.
But then so we’ll see or who knows if it could be somehow of “use”… (and thats) out of “pity” - as being “pathetic could begets pity” too. So goodluck w/ that!
Yawn–can someone actually wake me up when anyone posts something original. Because all I see here is previous people with new names—————————————-funny about that.
If you don’t support free speech for everyone, free expression of all ideas even the ones you don’t like then you don’t support it at all. Period. You’re showing your ignorance by saying that only some kinds of speech are entitled to be heard. Don’t threaten with karma; you don’t understand it. Not speaking your truth has karmic implications too. But none of this has anything to do with RB. She is sinking into oblivion anyway, and it won’t matter.
She wants, craves & needs to be in the public eye (almost 24/7 if she would push it a little bit more)… so she’s ASKING for criticism. That’s just how it is. You step into the public eye, you’re going to get criticized. If she can’t handle it, then she needs to get out of it ASAP.
If some rabid fans can’t handle it then I don’t know what to tell you other than just get over it. It’s going to happen whether you like it or not. Pot calling the kettle black comes to mind. People pushing their opinion on others and the others raising to the bait.
Stop crying about people not liking your fave celeb and move on yourself and/or stop ranting about someone being mean to someone you don’t even know yourself. She’s BRINGING IT UPON HERSELF just by what, how & why she has CHOSEN to do. Go into the corner with a box of puffs and come to terms with it already.
There, I’ve said my piece and I’m off the soapbox. The mic’s is on to the next “ranter” – lol!
You stupid american’s and your freedom of speech nonsense.
When are you idiots going to wake up. You losers of the world are wasting your time with this rubbish, talking about stuff that means nothing - is nothing of substance, while the rest of the world take over.
You guys arnt sh*t no more.
Re-Post:
I actually have something “nice” to say here but noticing what “spamming” more over this thread. I won’t say it anymore just to make this thread ever-CONSISTENT as it always been - lol!
@#78 - you still don’t get it - and
@#79 -observer
And I couldn’t agree more! :-)
@80 - Jase
I am from Europe BTW, and yes, I am a supporter of freedom of speech as well.
she is hearing “h” and a ring…come on she is desperate for attention. i can hear her rep saying “go out and wear the h necklace and the ring, make sure the paps i sent can see them. this will get people talking about you again since i havent been doing s%^&”
You people who are claiming that you have the RIGHT to say anything you want about someone without consequence are talking out your a$$es.
Anyone with a brain knows that in virtually every state in the US, the first amendment of the Constitution does not apply to defamation of character, also known as libel and slander. And this is true even when it is done on the Internet. If some of the comments I read here were published in a magazine under the author’s real name, they would face legal consequences, very expensive consequences at that. Its not unusual for a celeb to sue a tabloid and be awarded substantial damages by the courts.
Just because you get away with it doesn’t make it legal or right.
Expressing an opinion is not slanderous or libelous in a court of law unless the person accusing another of slander or libel can prove that they’ve been hurt substantially (in a way that can be measured by monetary damages) by what was being said or printed. It’s perfectly legal to say that Rachel looks like a homeless person, that she has no talent and probably no future in film because this is the opinion of a few people who don’t own or run TV stations, film studios, newspapers, magazines or other forms of media. Our opinions are not preventing RB from either looking for or finding work because she doesn’t read them, doesn’t care abou them, and neither do the people that would potentially employ her. JJ is shielded from libel laws because they don’t endorse anything that is said by users commenting, and are only performing the service of re-printing photos and articles with links, etc. and allowing public comment. It’s a public board and people have the right to say anything they want. JJ gets paid when there are hits to the board. That’s the extent of the involvement. JJ is not liable can’t can’t be sued for anything on this board.
You don’t like what’s being said and it’s your right to not like it and say so here. I think you should quit crying libel and slander of your favorite actrine and figure out that every single actor in the world gets criticism about everything about them– some of it deeply unfair. They expect (or should) to lose jobs because their body type is wrong for a part or they’re not young or sexy enough, no matter how talented they are. The difference is that the talented, driven and persistent keep working because people keep hiring them. The rest leave. HC is working again. RB is not. Figure it out. RB doesn’t have 1/10th the talent of HC and it’s become very obvious after Jumper and the poor screens of her performance in NYILU. She’ll be lucky if her daddy or some relative can get her another job in TV.
I have no idea who this HC person is you are referring to but as for your other comments I will repeat my last statement:
People do not have a right to say anything they want just because it’s a public board. JJ may not be responsible unless these people are his employees. But the individual posters themselves can be found liable if, as you state, it can be proven that the celebrity was hurt substantially by a statement or rumor. As for measuring damages monetarily, that’s what lawyers are for. So don’t think that a public board provides some sort of constitutional exception to libel laws. Its just not true. Obviously anonymity makes pursuing such a lawsuit impractical. But that doesn’t negate the spirit of libel laws. As I said before, just because you can get away with it doesn’t make it right or legal.
It’s only slander if you take it to the press and verbally make a statement against that person or celebrity those in the public eye give up much of the defermation law, That is why magazines have to be careful what they print because of libel law. Distinguishing between public and private figures for the purposes of defamation law is sometimes difficult. They also voluntarily place themselves in the public eye and consequently relinquish some of their privacy rights. For these reasons, false statements about limited-purpose public figures that relate to the public controversies in which those figures are involved are not considered defamatory unless they meet the actual-malice test and in this case knowone is going to the press here to give information that is defaming her. There is a gray area and these boards would be so closed down it it interfered in libel law or defamation of chacter. People can speak on what they see or how they see and if the person who doesn’t like what they see then verbally gives an opinion on this there isn’t much you or the celebrity can do.. Bilson put her self out there to be ridiculed and she knows it ..and good chance this was a press stunt she arranged to do if she means so much to HC then he would be all over her like flies on **** and right now he has not been near her publically in months. Friends yes I say they are any more then that let this man state it not her.
#86 there have been bigger celebrities that take major tabloids and people to court that they can’t win anything from because they can’t prove enough slander exsists..RB is small potatoes here she is really a dead end actress who is dying slowly and using pathetic means to get attention. ANY celebrity who puts themselves in this postion is open to critisim and all celebrities know this thus the reason they don’t bother with the boards. UNLESS there is physical threats to the celebrity from an opinion board. And to date I never saw that happen the courts will not use what is said here as leverage..You like the woman fine that is on you. Many don’t like her and that’s fine as well..You don’t like the slander again that’s on you and you alone..is this hurting RB career NO she knows what she is and this is exactly why she is going to this extend to get noticed and nothing more..
hay irishdream. i agree with ya darlin’ i smell a stunt when i see on. i rather wave a skunk at it . she needs to get her name out there for her line. this is not slander. this is my opinion. if that person wants to fight! bring it! i fair to warn you i have a witchy additude. so don’t piss me off
@ HER_fanatics
READ IT… WEEP IT… & SUCK IT!
All you people think you’re much better…….I agree with #65
Such hypocrites.
I have to agree with miss white lighter!
What people have said is not scandalous or SLANDER!
@ Tina B,
I agree with you then. Let JJ show or expose all the poster’s on jj. Let’s see if, it is the same person posting under different names. I think not! You will see that there are a bunch of people out their expressing their own opinions! HA! Face the fact’s darling. Not everyone loves your prom queen!
@ #79,
Very well said. If, Rachel is getting bashed and trashed now it, is what she has done and brought this attention to herself! She asked for the attention being and getting so much media attention showing, off her jewelry and makes sure to put that on. Funny! She does not bother to fix herself up. For her DNKY line coming up soon you, would think she would have at least gone to the NY Fashion show week this very week! . She is out and doing mundane tasks as usual and sporting old jewelry and looking a frumpy mess. This is our fashion icon? I think not! :roll:
If this actrine would get a real life, a bf who can stand to be at her side and a job, everyone would get off her case. It’s that simple.
Has Josh has his wedding yet?
I think she does all this for attention too. Does that make her a bad person? No. But she should just be straight with people and stop pretending that she’s such a private person. Because she’s far from it. Her actions speak louder than her words. You can’t run around talking about how private you are. But get photographed 4 to 5 times a week and run around wearing an “H” necklace, yet you’re “private” about your relationship. That just screams “I want attention” to me. She wants people to speculate, wonder and ask about it. Her wearing the necklace is not even necessary. You’re with Hayden, we get it. Does she wear it because he won’t be bothered to be photographed with her, goes missing for weeks and she doesn’t want people to forget? Or is it because after a good year and a half, you still can’t get a picture of him even giving her a pat on the back? And she wants everyone to know “Hey, he is indeed my man.” Just because she’s cute, bubbly and seemingly nice doesn’t mean that she’s above being an attention seeker. We’re so quick to skewer other “celebrities” for being “media whores” when they clearly have absolutely nothing on their agenda. And are still “followed” around. And I use the term “followed” loosely. Because their publicists make some of those calls. Not all, but a lot of them. So she should be grouped in with the rest of them, because she’s no different. And trust me, there are A LOT of pictures of her that don’t even get put on JJ. A LOT. You would think she was Angelina with all that attention. But she’s not, so what does that tell you? I wouldn’t be irritated by her at all if she’d just come out and admit what she’s really all about. That would make her more real to me. I could care less about her relationship. Just admit you like the attention.
BUT she doesn’t deserve all this at all. I know she never reads this stuff. And everyone’s going on about free speech. Yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion. This isn’t a fan site. But there’s a huge difference between an opinion(A strong one) and pure hatred. And some of these comments are indeed pure hatred. If everyone would stop posting hateful comments, she wouldn’t generate even half the posts she gets. So the solution is simple. If you’re tired of seeing and hearing about her, skip the thread. The more you post, the better for her.
That’s not too contradicting is it?
I agree. Another dead giveaway is she almost never repeats the clothes she wears. When celebrities want to be noticed and land in the fashion pages and the magazines, that’s what they do.
#95
Elena, that was the best thing I’ve ever read on this subject. Well said. You covered a lot of ground in your comment, and no, you weren’t too contradicting. lol My favorite part of your comment is where you said, essentially, that there can be completely free speech without one hateful word being spoken. I think you proved it in your comment.
@70 and 73
I didn’t see your comments till now. I completely agree with you.
You guys don’t know what hate speech really is. If you want to see hatefulness on JJ, just look under the recent photos of Madonna or any of the Sienna Miller stuff. What RB gets is pretty tame compared to that. Get some perspective please.
Also I see that HC finally came out and said that the ring RB is sporting is not his. We know the H necklace is not his. They haven’t been photographed together in 3 months. RB needs to find a bf or a financee that is proud of her and is proud to be seen with her, also needs to GET A JOB. Her credibility is declining by the minute.
Agree with all of you!
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!