OlderThu, 11 September 2008 at 1:22 pm
Katie Holmes: Wide-Leg Jeans Are In Again!
Katie Holmes is living large, wearing Current/Elliott’s 1973 wide-leg jeans in a moment of rolled-up, skinny ones.
The 29-year-old actress was seen out and about in New York City on Thursday morning also wearing a colorful headband and an oversized red, Hermes bag.
S has been rehearsing for her Broadway debut in the Arthur Miller play All My Sons. Joining Holmes are John Lithgow, Dianne Wiest and Patrick Wilson. Schoenfeld Theater, 236 West 45th St. Opens Oct 16.
Share This Post:
116 Comments
ouch, I thought it looked more like Tom’s size. You know he hates to be photographed with his lifts!
with*out* his lifts, I meant…lol…
I actually like the jeans , they are just to long on her. Taken up a bit they would look nice. I just don’t get the bag , I must be the only women in the world who really doesn’t know or care about handbags(or shoes for that matter) I just think it’s a bit silly to carry something that big that isn’t luggage. But to each their own.
Creature from Black Lagoon @ 09/11/2008 at 9:21 pm
So creature you say you aren’t a scientologist and you’re a HIM. So how old are you? Something in one of your posts led me to think you are in high school? Correct?
He strikes me as a needy sort (i.e., always needs to have a female on his arm)
_______________________
I think he needs this only for “show” and to be seen. Many in the know say he is desperate not to be seen at awards ceremonies or red carpet events alone because he is so hung up on his public appearance. It makes it interesting (not that it wasn’t already strange) that was his first known sighting/appearance with Katie–a huge award event rather than a normal date or dinner, etc.
I think Tom Cruise is one of those celebrities that has a very weird and ultra-private private life. I think he’s probably on the West Coast doing his own thing and very happy that she’s on the opposite side of the country.
That thing in her hair is so weird. It serves no purpose. I know exactly what headband/scarf look she was going for, but once again she totally missed the mark. It’s too short and placed at such a weird angle on her head.
The fedora hat she tried to wear one day is still the most painfully obvious (and failed) attempt to look “hip and now”. I still cringe to think of it. But this one just confuses me.
It’s so sad to be Katie Holmes. All the money in the world cannot buy happiness when your life is a fraud.
Bet it’s sucks to know her ex-boyfriend is hotter than lava, on a hit new show and living just around the corner with his gorgeous model/actress/fashionista girlfriend who always has reason to smile. Bet she wishes Josh really visited her, but that’s just another lie too.
Boo hoo.
She doesn’t look pregnant ,but never thought she was since she is still with Tom Cruise. When she was first photographed she smiled and was loving it, now she’s acting like Jackie O. (the leave me alone pose). She’s stupid she could never be Jackie O. she has no class, no fashion sense, her hair is ugly and she’s a total moron except for shopping and spending TC’s money.
Ugh. She looks like Gumby.
The pants are too wide and too long on her.
She needs Victoria to help her out!
Creature…you are using too many double negatives in your sentences lately. You disappoint me.
Hey GV!!!!!
WTG KATIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
McLovin, servants are paid employees. That’s exactly how he behaves, as a servant.
The guy is a paid servant/caretaker of the Cruises just like a maid, handyman or cook or butler. The only difference is he’s armed.
Well, whatever, he Creature sounds like he is 13 to 15 years old with a huge crush on Mz. Katie.
The Katie evolution is a joy to watch….
i dunno wht is so special bout her. and shes like a zombie. just doing nothing. boooring.
MORE MILEY POSTS!
for the love of god ! NOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooo
NO BIG JEANS OH GOD DIES (x.x)
Just one question, where are photos of the real stars of the play–veteran Broadway theater actors–or don’t they go to rehersal everyday, too? Wonder how they feel about the TomKat jinx on ticket sales…
So true, susan.
All religions give the government endless headache. Even the Pop has always given pressure to the governments. Some countries like china completely reject new religions. It’s understandable.
Good luck Katie. You did nothings wrong.
Susan, there’s not tomkat jinx on ticket sales. Tickets have been selling well according to Variety and broadwayworld.com. Only trashy papers like the ny post reported that the play wasn’t selling well.
The truth behind the scenes is that they are very disappointed in ticket sales because Katie was NOT the big draw they expected. Daniel Radcliffe is selling more tickets. The play will do just fine probably but they had an idea that it would be bigger because of her name.
Katie better do really exceptional work because she has a huge bad buzz surrounding her performance and reviews will be unforgiving.
To bb…
Variety only ran an article quoting the producer and publicist of the play issuing their assurances that ticket sales were not lackluster.
What did you really think they were going to say? “No, we can’t see tickets to our play”? LOL
Broadway babe, may I ask where you are getting this info? Like I said, Variety and other reputable site have said that AMS tickets have been selling well. According to Varety, the advance was $3.5 million which is actually more than what Daniel Radcliffe’s play sold.
ok, but you’re still not telling me where you are getting your info.
Also, I know that producers might exaggerate the amount of tickets sold, but I don’t think they would outright lie and say that play had a $3.5 million advance if it didn’t even come close to that. Won’t they lose credibility if it turns out they were lying?
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!