Top Stories

Rachel Bilson is a Beanie Babe

Rachel Bilson is a Beanie Babe

Rachel Bilson keeps her head warm with a beanie while dropping off some paperwork at a friend’s home in North Hollywood on Tuesday.

The 27-year-old former O.C. star has a capsule junior sportswear line from DKNY Jeans called Edie Rose that will hit stores this month.

Here’s a snippet about the line from Page Six Magazine:

The line is named for her maternal grandmother, Edith, who passed away a few years ago, and her friend’s grandmother Rose, who reminds her of her own. Speaking of Edie, Rachel says, “She would just be so proud and…ack”—she stops for a second to fan her glassy big brown eyes as they well up with tears. For a second, those eyes, mixed with the freckles on her nose, make her look a bit like a Precious Moments figurine. “To have her name live on in a way,” she says, “it just makes it so much more special.”

10+ pictures inside of beanie babe Rachel Bilson

Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 01
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 02
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 03
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 04
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 05
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 06
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 07
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 08
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 09
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 10
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 11
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 12
Bilson-beanie rachel bilson beanie 13

JJ Links Around The Web

  • LeAnn Rimes will legally be single in June 2010 - PopEater
  • Simon Cowell hangs out on a jetski - PopSugar
  • Pink has a fun last night on tour - LaineyGossip
  • Learn how to get perfect hair with Pauly D - Dlisted
  • Vanessa Hudgens puts her sneakers on - JustJaredJr
  • Brittany Murphy's autopsy is complete - TheSuperficial
  • Even off camera, the Gleeks love to sing - Celebuzz
Michael Buckner/Getty

114 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] Show All

she is so undeserving of that lifestyle it makes me sick!

Gross out @ 09/18/2008 at 3:41 pm

You know, the single biggest casualty in this whole thing is Hayden, no matter if the rumors are true or not. We know for a certainty that he does everything he can to have his private life remain private. Whether he is dating her or not, whether he is marrying her or not, whether he has or will elope with her or not, no matter what the press will keep hounding him about Rachel and will be after him even worse now. Unless he does the one thing that he really doesn’t want to do, which is make some kind of statement about the state of his private life.

Rachel is not innocent in this, cannot pretend that it ’s all just the press reading things into what she said. She’s been pouring gasoline on the rumors for months and so have her supporters. Whether they’re true or not, she is one rotten fiancee for feeding public and press speculation on Hayden’s private life, when he is so desperate to keep quiet about it. And if she is not his fiancee, she is the worst sort of press wh*** for taking her bff’s privacy and violating it. And if she isn’t a friend now after he publically said, ‘ain’t my ring,’ then she is a vindictive b**** and an unprofessional talentless media s***. If there is a God, she will never work in any film project of any size or respectability again.

You guys keep forgetting what #102 is saying. HAYDEN LIKES HIS PRIVATE LIFE PRIVATE! He is going to deny whatever he may or may not with whoever. He always did. If it makes him a so called ‘liar’ then so be it. He doesn’t owe any of us one single explanation. You guys just keep that in mind, alright? HAYDEN DOESN’T OWE US ANYTHING! I’m not saying that we can’t have our opinions but as far as expecting anything out of actually either of them….. Keep waiting. ANd no the wedding won’t prove a damn thing. It’s obvious the two are friends. If he shows it could be because they are friends. But I doubt he’ll be there.

Personally 55% of me says they are together and 45% of me says they aren’t. I don’t know. Like I say just wait and see. They’ll eventually slip up somewhere if they are.

And for those engagment rumors. Guys the ring she was wearing isn’t an engagment ring and I very much doubt they are married. We would difinitely know. You guys buy right into your so called “Rachel’s plan” for even letting something so obsurd cross your mind. It’s actually pretty funny.

no-kidding-sherlock @ 09/19/2008 at 12:05 am

“Credulity and/or Fanaticism” had taken its toll once again (sic).
You got some instinct right there, STIMULATE it (if you really have it?!) as unrelenting (callous & impervious) actions & expressions speaks LOUDER than words & hearsays!

real world @ 09/19/2008 at 2:17 am

She said when she settle down she wanted to elope.I didn’t hear him say nothing about it.Ithink all for publicity for her clothing line nothing more.I think this elope story is old new anyway.l(like months ago.) about him to the wedding i don’t think he going..He really don’t need to get embrass than he already is.Trouble might start andhe shouldn’t get caught up in that.I think she show that ring on purpose so he would leave.If she don’t want him no more stop hanging with his family and move on Think that he came there to do some of parts of his movie.until he is call back I don’t we are going to see him for awhile.unti he finish his movie.A far tthe relationship I really think its over.I don’t have to wait and see rather not he’s going because its over.I wouldn’t be surprise if she hook -up with someone at the wedding because they are kind of her kind of people.And he not going say they engage he never.will

she show that i think he got mad about it But he ought to know a girl need to be show off sometime,But think it was something last year.But i think its over.rachel know when a man stop going place with and want be seen with you it’s over she need stop trying make people everything ok when its not.

texas chic @ 09/19/2008 at 9:37 pm

i know the ring has been commented and probaly old news but on x17 rachel in las vegas in the video she was trying to hide it but the last post where she was wearing that awlful sundress she was flagging it everywhere whats up with now she isnt wearing it .

“On and/or Off” w/ the ring, all just “media-mileage suckage”!

she can wear what she wants, she owes you nothing

rancid turnip @ 09/20/2008 at 8:40 pm

No talent whatsoever, can’t act at all. Needs to seriously find another line of work.

@ 108
- Whatever suits to a zealot’s level of imprudence against on a NON-zealot’s cynicism would always have a place to a non-”fansite/blog site”. That’s all there is!

@ 109
- And this is just so “predictable”!

ADVENTURES IN COPYRIGHT : CELEBRITY EDITION
Doubtless you’ve heard of Edie Rose, the capsule collection Rachel Bilson designed for DKNY Jeans.
But it’s a more doubtful you’ve heard of Sretsis, a very small line based out of Bangkok that once had a very brief mention on The Fashionista Diaries……
fashionista.com/2008/09/adventures_in_copyright_celebr.php

http://fashionista.com/2008/09/adventures_in_copyright_celebr.php

texas chic @ 09/21/2008 at 6:06 am

from what i heard through a source hayden did buy her a ring not the she was photogragh with it is a 2,000.00 cognac ring for being a friend ,but they are dating not engaged.

@ #111 - Adventures In Copyright : Celebrity Edition

God Bless R. Barkson and her loose brain cells!

@ fashionista.com/2008/09/adventures_in_copyright_celebr.php

That’s absolutely “plagiarism” (aside obviously from having ghost designer/s) - tsk… what a freaking nerve!

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.