OlderAngelina Jolie Plans To Adopt Again… But Not Now
Angelina Jolie apepars on the Today show where she was interviewed by Matt Lauer at NBC Studios in New York City on Thursday.
In the interview, Angelina talked about her latest movie Changeling, saying that “It’s an amazing story, because it’s a true story.”
When asked if there would ever be a place their family would settle down in, Angelina talked about how her children like moving from one place to another.
Angelina also confirmed she is planning to adopt again! Asked how soon, she said, “It depends…you can’t even start the process until any new children are six-months-old. It’s a smart thing…to understand when to bring another child in.” (Twins Knox and Vivienne are 3-months-old.)
10+ more pics inside of Angelina Jolie talking about adopting again…
Share This Post:
477 Comments
Love the interview. Angie looks so beautiful and happy. She and Brad are so in love. I am really happy for them. They will adopt one more for Z in the future.
Well, I’m guessing after Madonna got all that attention yesterday, she wanted to steal her thunder. That’s how showbiz works, people!
…and this woman wonders why people talk about her private life more than her films. She’s meant to be promoting a film and she’s talking about adopting. She really loves the attention, doesn’t she?
What a beautiful woman Angie is. The movie Changeling sounds like a chick flick but much more intense. Can’t wait to see Angie in this film.
———-LolaSvelt @ 10/16/2008 at 12:12 pm —————-
This was taped last week you moron. Shecch such smuck.
# 110 African Girl @ 10/16/2008 at 11:47 am Angelina Jolie Plans to adopt again. . . .This is the quote People Magazine and NBC are pushing? This is so disrespectful to Clint Eastwood and Changeling. She went there to discuss the movie and all these people culled out of it what She plans on adopting again….EVENTUALLY?!!
First of all, who here does not know they plan to adopt again? So why use this if it isn’t for sensationalism?
In as much as I like hearing little tid bits about the JPs, I wouldn’t blame them if they stopped giving interviews, honestly!
_____________________________
Please. It’s not even ABOUT ’sensationalism.’ What in hell about ‘adoption,’ which she and Brad have done twice before together, is either ’sensationalist,’ or ‘new’ at this point?’
Answer: NOTHING
What it’s about, is sabatoge.
Taking away HER voice and HER power as sure as Christine Collins was taken away.
It does nothing but FEED the same so-called PHONY f**king ‘argument,’ that those blog critics from The envelope site want to maintain about her, that her ‘celebrity,’ and her life interfere with the characters. That’s b.s., and again - it’s just their way of sabatoging her and stealing her power.
Here you have the media taking an interview about her film, latching onto the one personal detail that everyone knows about already, and deciding to make THAT the ‘headline!!’ Not Angie’s performance, not Clint’s film - Angelina’s possible ‘adoption’ at some point in the future. Oh really? What a surprise.
Then these same media outlets have the gall to turn around and BLAME HER later for her ‘personal life,’ and ‘celebrity,’ taking over her professional life (films and acting). YET it’s them DOING the sh*t.
To see Jared standing by, doing the exact same thing is sick.
# 19 how dare some of you @ 10/16/2008 at 10:19 am It is not for any of you to decide when others have had enough children or not. Who the he** are you people? You should be embarrased to even post that.
+++++++++++
Absolutely!
I grew up Irish Catholic and most of the kids I knew had families of 6,8,10,12 kids. There is always enough love, time and attention if it is what you choose.
I agree her hair looks better, not all thin and stringy as usual. I just can’t stand listening to her speak …. it’s the oh, um, oh, um, oh, um………can’t she put a sentence together to make sense? I thought she was supposed to be smart, guess not. No matter how you dress her up, she’s still a little ****** and I can’t get that out of my mind about her……..no class. Too bad, cause now she’s just a **** with kids.
yeah betty, you’re so objective as you’re calling her a little *****. look, old c*nt, take your aged fat cow faniston ass off the beautiful oscar winner’s thread you ugly b*tch
# 110 African Girl @ 10/16/2008 at 11:47 am Angelina Jolie Plans to adopt again. . . .This is the quote People Magazine and NBC are pushing? This is so disrespectful to Clint Eastwood and Changeling. She went there to discuss the movie and all these people culled out of it what She plans on adopting again….EVENTUALLY?!!
First of all, who here does not know they plan to adopt again? So why use this if it isn’t for sensationalism?
In as much as I like hearing little tid bits about the JPs, I wouldn’t blame them if they stopped giving interviews, honestly!
————
Hey AG. Although I understand what you’re saying, and thanks for saying it without needing to scream, be rude, nasty, or making it sound as if you speak for all. That said, I didn’t give the title much thought because I just didn’t lol. I saw the interview and I hung on every word, and especially the main subject, to the point of it compelling me to do some research on the actual case (have a link above about it if you’re interested) and enjoyed her speak on the future and the present. It doesn’t bother me at all the title given (I am glad JJ amended it to say not now) as I think people who want to focus on that part of the interview would have anyway just as I focused on not the movie, but the story that prompted it.
I guess I’m not getting how it would stop those hellbent on negative opinions by having a different lead in. My God, when has a title ever stopped a thread from turning into a Jennifer Aniston hate-a-thon? Or a thread that should have been focused on one of their humanitarian efforts somehow ending up lost in the fire started by a battle about again, Jennifer Aniston or any *** for tat someone can come up with in 400 posts more or less.
We’re cool I hope, I just needed to speak to it because it’s something that I really am puzzled by the reaction especially when title have never dictated content.
jpf
OMG, what a women!!!!!!!!
she’s so beautiful!! and a really good actress too!
but honestly I think she should stop adopting… I guess it isn’t easy with 6 kids already and with seven… I would freak out!!!
AG the only thing that has worked for my oily skin is weekly home facials and or masks. That cuts things down a whole lot when you establish a routine. But then there are times that the oil starts shining through a bit due to any number of reasons. I use a fine milled face power and lightly touch up the oily spots. That’s all you can really do. Being under the hot studio lights made the oil start seeping through Angelina’s face a bit Those oil blotting sheets work a little but they are made of the same seat cover paper that are found in public bathrooms so…. Do not use mineral powders. They give normal skin an oily look. On oily skin, you’ll look like you need an oil rigger. Stay away from mineral makeups.
Ingrid @ 10/16/2008 at 12:15 pm
…and this woman wonders why people talk about her private life more than her films. She’s meant to be promoting a film and she’s talking about adopting. She really loves the attention, doesn’t she?
************************
…..and people wonder why humanity is going down the crapper? With people like you, what can we expect? Did you watch the interview or are you just ignorantly running your mouth? Do you think she went their to discuss her adoption plans? Maybe you think she interrupted ML when he talking about the Changeling to regal us with stories about her Adoption? God, use your tiny brain once in a while will ya.
It really is a good thing stupidity is not painful or you’d be in agony right now.
She’s like a candle in the wind because she’s made of wax! Sorry, but Angelina just looks horrible. She’s had so much botox that her face looks shiny, just like Nicole Kidman’s face. She’s too young to ruin her face like that.
Anastacia @ 10/16/2008 at 12:30 pm
_________________________________
It’s not “her” , it’s THEY. And THEY have been saying since they are together that they want at least between 7 to 9 kids and they want to raise them while they are still young.
What she said in this interview is nothing new. IN the future they will adopt.
WOW!! Angie is so gorgeous and yet so down to earth. I have always liked her and now that she is with Brad they make the perfect couple.
Changeling sounds like such a great movie . Will be heading to the theater with a bunch of friends to see it as soon as it comes to our city.
OT skip, skip, skip…you’ve been warned.
Part 1 of 3 topic from previous thread
OT for lylian,
Re: 698 lylian @ 10/15/2008 at 4:14 am
“The point I’m making is, it is wrong to use this sort of guilt by association, if the association took place years ago.”
Hi lylian,
I too am having problems posting.
I think we’re both focusing on two different issues. I agree with you on these points. 1. guilt by association when incidences happened so long ago is unfair. I agree with this statement for most associations and incidences. I was not implying nor stating that Ayres influences Obama, nor that Obama is influenced by Ayres. There has never been an indication that Obama and Ayres associate with each other outside that fund raiser and six committee meetings, nor has there been any note of Obama sanctioning Ayres philosophy. However knowing Ayres violent history and Obama’s future in politics, his advisors should have been more reticient about a fund raising connection because Obama’s constituency, the media and the public are going to hear about it and make a big deal of it. Obama doesn’t need Ayres $200 donation but Ayres may need Obama.
Your direction was guilt by association…my bad if there was a misunderstanding…I didn’t make myself very clear…my focus was strictly on Ayres and Dhorn and the history of their leadership in a violent organization…nothing more. Like groundcontrol #473, IMO re: Ayres and Dhorn there is no defense for their historical actions, the cost incurred by public taxpayers, destruction of property, injuries and death…terrorism on any level is never defensible even years later.
The radical Weatherman Underground was a known home-grown terrorist group in the late 60’s stemming from wayward idealism whose Bolshevik intent was to convert mainstream America into socialism with riots and bombings with killing innocents who were in the way.
Like Obama has stated in regards to Ayres past, I do not condone violence for any expression of dissent nor do I justify violence in hindsight for any historical event as Ayres has attempted to do in his memoirs.
ingrid- so you only hear what you want to huh? Did you not hear Matt ask her about more kids-do you expect her not to answer? And dear betty, she is very smart and I love hearing her talk, about her love for Brad and her children. I guess people who are happy in their lives-well they don’t needto impress people like you. She is very smart and has proven herself among presidents, secretary of states,senators and so on……. and what soap have you watched today? You just can’t stand that she is ssooooo happy with Brad and such a good mother, and that Brad loves her so much! Sorry for you and your sad life that you can’t be happy for this family.
Beauty Queen @ 10/16/2008 at 12:35 pm
__________________________________
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
So much stupidity, envy, jelousy and hate… poor thing…
Angelina Jolie is a true superstar,she is loved and respected all over the world (agree)
Wonderful,stunning,beautiful ,intelligent
i love her
so inspirational its incredible
Angelina doesn’t have botox and neither has Brad. Angelina is 33 and has the lines of a person who has taken care of her skin. She is of Eastern European descent. Translation? great skin. She takes care to stay away from the sun. We all note that. Her lips are naturally full because she is young and inherited them from her parents. They will thin out like Brad’s and her dad’s and everyone else, due to age but not anytime soon. Around 60 is when her lips will become noticeably thinner.
By the way, there’s nothing wrong with botox if one needs it. Ask middle America. They live on it and on liposuction. I should know.
Adoption in itself is not sensational.
Adoption by the JP…like everything they do is made sensational. The JPs who have had pseudo psychoanalyst dissect their words, thoughts and deeds just to allude to something sick and sinister in their motives.
People adopt every day, the JPs do and they are said to be addicts.
People have kids, the JP do and they say it’s via IVF
The ordinary gets magnified, twisted and painted with harsh brush strokes when it comes to the JPs. The media uses the ordinary, everyday things to sabotage then JPs by making it sensational.
Sensationalism is the weapon of sabotage.
Why did people ask the same question over and over “Do you want adopt more children?” They have been saying these since they got together. They both want a big family, a football team or 7-9 children. The reporters are boring.
Pages: « 1 … 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 … 20 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!