Brad Pitt is Benjamin Button

Canola @ 11/03/2008 at 8:09 pm
I m a LOSER!

and the biggest stalker of brad and angelina in the whole world!

thats why i have NO LIFE!

PITY ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*********************************************************************************************

No pity for losers. Sorry. Go jump off a bridge.

I just read jenny poo interview at the LA times and i must say, she’s as dumb as a box of rocks, SNL pegged her right, for a good laugh go read it, people mag has a link.

# 110 bdj @ 11/03/2008 at 6:29 pm

http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/11/03/exploring-david-finchers-world-in-the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button/

++++++++++++++++++

I clicked on this link to read the CCOBB story…then got sidetracked reading a story about why Don Cheadle is replacing Terrence Howard in the Iron Man sequel (basically Howard’s a PITA and Cheadle is cheaper)…and the comment below had me ROTFL…

http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/11/02/details-on-how-terrence-howard-lost-his-role-in-iron-man-2/

Why are we even talking about this? The role is so trivial and incidental, anyone could have done it. Big deal… The money they save could be spent on a boob job for Paltrow and more, even higher heels if they want some value for it.

GO SEE CHANGELING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GO SEE CHANGELING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GO SEE CHANGELING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GO SEE CHANGELING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GO SEE CHANGELING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GO SEE CHANGELING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=23565

With Oscar season just around the corner, Clint Eastwood’s Changeling was one of the first films to fire a few shots across the bows of its rivals. The Angelina Jolie-starrer expanded from limited release into around 1,850 cinemas, and grossed an estimated $9.4 million as a result. Its $5,000 per-screen average was the highest in the top 10

# 117 dianad1968 @ 11/03/2008 at 7:10 pm

#90

PT, I was wondering the same thing. These b**ches are so hypocritical.

I read the story on the UK link you gave earlier, and their “insider report” that Brad’s parents are upset with Angie for the W cover picture, and ask myself, who the hell writes these stories? Isn’t Brad the photographer for these pictures, so why, according to the “insider”, are the parents “mad’ at only Angie? And they wonder why X is hated more and more, because we all know that its because of her phoniness why Angie is still being persecuted all these years later.

This fraud house of cards will come falling down sooner than later, and I can’t wait.

++++++++++++++++

The initial report about Brad’s parents came from Star…and for that reason alone legitimate websites shouldn’t have bothered repeating it! LOL. I’m amazed at the number of gossip sites that repeat the stuff in the tabloids even though they KNOW for fact that 99.99% of it is made up. As someone else pointed out - the dumbest thing about the Star story is that Brad’s parents were in France when the photos were taken! Okay…that’s the second dumbest part - the dumbest part is that the Star wants us to believe that Brad’s parents would tell anyone outside their immediate family, whom they can trust not to talk, that they were upset with Brad/Angie over the photos. The Pitts are NOT people who put their business in the street and THAT is what annoys me about what the Star does repeatedly. They’re dragging innocent bystanders into their lies and turning THEM into tabloid fodder. Making up stories about Brad & Angie fighting, getting married, etc? Fine - but leave their kids and non-famous family out of it. I hope Brad sics his lawyers on the folks at Star again.

anoble @ 11/03/2008 at 9:21 pm
I am so glad I got early voting in. Rock the Vote on Tuesday. It is a very important election and every vote counts.

bdj @ 11/03/2008 at 9:24 pm

anoble @ 11/03/2008 at 9:21 pm
I am so glad I got early voting in. Rock the Vote on Tuesday. It is a very important election and every vote counts.
——————————————————————-
I probably should have went early but my daughter is coming home tonight just to go with me tomorrow - it’s her first presidential election. I am very proud of her - it amazes me the amount of young people who aren’t voting.

http://spectrum.buffalo.edu/article.php?id=37952

Eastwood delivers disturbingly true, Oscar-worthy tale
COURTNEY SUDBRINK - Staff Writer

Between giving birth and saving the world, Angelina Jolie found time to deliver an Oscar-worthy performance.

In legendary actor-turned-director Clint Eastwood’s (Letters from Iwo Jima) most recent film Changeling, Jolie proves to be more than just half of the world’s most photographed couple.

Her latest role demonstrates that she is one of today’s most talented actresses, giving a praiseworthy and poignant portrayal of a mother whose convictions alone were enough to restore justice to her city.

hough Changeling plays out as something of an epic film, its two-hour-and-21-minute runtime is not an issue. Unlike many other films, the length is not something that comes into consideration when viewing it.

The plot has enough twists and turns to keep audiences captivated throughout. In addition to this, a stellar supporting cast and Eastwood’s penchant for historical accuracy makes this worth the price of admission.

The fact that the film is based on a true story makes it all the more disturbing.

After watching the eerie, dramatic plot unfold, it is clear Eastwood has made the all-too-rare type of film that one will watch and be forced to think about for days after.

Although Changeling is certainly worthy of Oscar consideration, it is not a film people should see if they are unwilling to devote adequate time to reflecting upon what transpires on the screen.

# 126 dianad1968 @ 11/03/2008 at 7:25 pm #116

ebmo,

One other thing that doesn’t make sense:

It seems that 2 of X films that she recently made, haven’t been able to find distributors, and not a peep from the media. Could you imagine if that was Angie or Brad? That would be reported ad nauseum.

+++++++++++++

LOL. The media would cease to exist if that ever happened to Brad or Angie. I really can’t even wrap my brain around the concept. THEY are true movie stars. X is wannabe. She’s Jessica Simpson if Brad didn’t marry her. I left a comment on an EOnline blog this morning - some Faniston calling Angie a “man-stealer”…I said if Brad had dumped X in 2003 when they had a trial separation (we all know it was)…then the Fanistons wouldn’t have a pot to piss in or a bed to shove it under. They’d have BUPKUS to complain about.

If Brad hadn’t married X she’d have never been falsely elevated to the level of “major studio movie actress”. She’d have continued doing her crappy tv show and toiled in indy films trying in vain to break into a starring role in a major studio release. Instead…she marries Brad and she’s automatically bumped to “B List” status for movies.

Nobody in their right mind would have watched “The Good Girl” and said, “This girl pops off the screen! She’ll be huge in the right movies!” No way, no how, not on this planet and not in her lifetime. Therefore - I blame Brad for marrying that stupid b#tch and fostering her delusions of becoming a star of the silver screen. She was a freaking cog in an ensemble show on the cathode ray tube. She’s not happy with her own fug face. Why in the hell would she think anyone else would want to see it magnified 100 times?

And that’s the difference between X’s fate of bad little movies without distributors and Brad & Angie working for the major studios with guaranteed distributorship of their films. Because THEY “pop of the screen”. Meanwhile…X is more like a splat ON the screen…

#164

PT,

Celebitchy is one of those blogs that consistently quote these tabs stories, and actually give their perpectives as though there is even a modicum of truth to them. It constantly amazes me, because the moderators seem like intelligent people, so I cannot understand how they do not use critical thinking when posting their stories.

I suppose the truth will always be the victim of the almighty dollar.

# 156 JM @ 11/03/2008 at 8:51 pm

I just read jenny poo interview at the LA times and i must say, she’s as dumb as a box of rocks, SNL pegged her right, for a good laugh go read it, people mag has a link.

++++++++++++++

Fcuk. I couldn’t even make through the Peeps article without gagging. There’s no way I’m going to read the LA Time interview. Who the fcuk talks like this? IT’S A MOVIE ABOUT A FRISKY PUPPY! IT’S NOT SHAKESPEARE! Sheesh…no wonder Brad used to smoke so damned much pot. Just reading this shite makes me want to get wasted…

“Owen Wilson is so divine in this film,” the actress tells the L.A. Times. “I’ve never seen him play a part like this. He was a man; he was a husband; he was a father.”

Aniston, 39, said her films either have a great working environment or a great finished product, but this one was both. “When you actually can have [the finished film] be as fantastic and fulfilling as the experience itself was, it’s called a home run. A creative, emotional home run. Those moments don’t happen that often.”