Gwyneth Paltrow’s Sheer Frontal Fun
MISSING PIECES
Gwyneth Paltrow takes a big big big fashion risk at the Two Lovers premiere on Tuesday in Paris, France.
The 36-year-old actress wore a structured Antonio Berardi dress with a sheer front, which included strategically-placed black lace cutouts. The semi-revealing dress showed off her white underwear! Oh-la-la. Gwyn finished off her look with two-toned Rupert Sanderson ankle booties, Chopard jewelry, and a Hugo Boss clutch.
At the London Film Festival last month, Gwyn also dared to be different in a furry Felder Felder jacket with leather sleeves.
15+ pictures inside of Gwyneth Paltrow’s sheer front…








Older










85 Comments
sorry chest also
What in the world does she have on? She usually has terrible taste in clothes and her stylist is doing her no favors with this dress. White underwear, ugh!! She looked better for a short while earlier this year, but this looks like something Apple made from scraps of material. And don’t let me get started on those shoes. She is beginning to look as gaunt as Madonna in the face. She is not aging well IMHO.
I love her oufit………..her not so much
again, ankle boots are the ugliest thing in the universe
From artistic point of view, her dress is interesting, it is in a Jean Paul Gaultier style. The dress is unconventional. I would not wear anything like this, but Gwyneth is an artist and she is allowed to be creative even in a radical way.
When she was younger, she seemed to have a better sense of style, or perhaps just a better stylist.
This outfit is just hideous. As someone said, it’s desperate. What is she trying to prove?
I think that she is really a beautiful woman when she lets her beauty show, which hasn’t been alot lately.
Go figure.
Can’t stand her and pretentious attitude that shines through in her fashion choices. She’s always been overrated and made it off her hollywood connections. Want real beauty and style? Try Charlize Theron. Want real talent? Try Kate Winslet or Cate Blanchett.
This is not a very good look for Gwyneth. I don’t think she is pretty, but with the right makeup and styling she can look very striking. Without it, she’s fairly bland.
Wow this woman can not dress AT ALL. She has lost all fashion sense. How the hell is she still lauded as a fashion icon. She is a freaking disaster.
Oh my! I can see she’s trying to be hip and fashion forward but she’s actually ended up making herself look older. Gwyneth’s 36 and could easily pass for 46 in pic# 18.
the most horrible outfit. this style on you Gwyneth doesn’t look well on you at all.
Ewwww. Horrid dress. Atrocious shoes. Unattractive female.
one of the ugliest dress I’ve ever seen.
one of the ugliest shoes I’ve ever seen
There is a scene in Iron Man where Gwyneth Paltrow looks delightfully charming in a black, cap-sleeved dress, minimal make-up and classic, black Christian Louboutin pumps. It sometimes amazes me why this lovely woman, who looks fantastic in simple, elegant clothes and natural-looking makeup that makes the most of her bone structure, would consider wearing such — well — “avant-garde” dresses and shoes.
I hope one day, she’ll take a good look at herself in the mirror, and consider that she would most probably look stupendous in a fabulous dress by Badgely-Mischka, Oscar dela Renta, Tom Ford or Michael Kors, (or the wonderful British designer Catherine Walker, who made many lovely dresses for Princess Diana) her hair drawn away from her face with small silver or platinum hairpins, and classic, high-heeled shoes on her feet. These strange outfits and shoes simply aren’t “her”.
Where’s Joaquin?!!
Ahahaha, kidding.
That dress is ugly,ugly,ugly…
I can’t believe she is getting so desperate!
she looks pretty but im not loving the dress. the boots irritates me. this look is meant to look elegant but it looks wrong with the boots. get rid of them!
This train wreck of a, dare I say dress, should never even have been made. That said, it also never should have been purchased, let alone worn in public. I’m both stunned and appalled.
What we are seeing is a 1950’s girdle opened up on the bottom and then sewn on top of a sheath dress as a sort of applique.
‘m in actual shock that the “crotch” piece, which ran between the wearers leggs and around her bum (my apologies for using a word I usually never would ) has been extended down the bottom front of the dress ?!!
The entire concept is in horrifically bad taste.
I amend my previous critique, it was pointed out to me that the dress is indeed a girdle sewn onto the dress but without backing. I can now see her underclothes.
I simply cannot even speak to this “look”.
So ugly
She looks fantastic as usual - this dress shows off how she is in amazing shape. I would love to go into her closet and burn every pair of shoes she owns.
Such an ugly dress.
I can’t believe she’s only 36. She looks so much older. Whatever she’s been doing to her face, she needs to stop!
YECH!!!!!!
I think you might be confusing what a 36-year-old looks like with a 25-year-old playing a 36-year-old character because the 36-year-old was too old looking to play a character their own age. She looks exactly how she should for her age, only better.
The more I look at the dress, the less I like it. But it still shows off how fit she is.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!