Sarah Palin Wears Short Shorts

thats not her, Sarah is hot but not this young

That;s NOT her Jared!

Also, Plain BLOWS. She’s way way way dumber than Bush. I’d rather the Republicans picked someone who can actually go toe-to-toe with Barack Obama, because Sarah’s ego is sky-high, she couldn’t handle or win a national election.

That is NOT Sarah Palin you gullible morons.

Thank God that thing did not become Vice-president.

She shouts about family values and morals. But leaves that special needs baby and the other young kids every weekend for political gain. I mean it is wonderful she is living her life, enjoying time alone and advancing her career. But why then shout about others not having family values, morals. It is the hypocracy that I cannot stand.

She needs to stick with posing in bathing suits because she definitely does not have the brains for politics!!

noelle #88

Many of us here are not accusing her of any inappropriateness. She is free to choose whatever she wants to wear and however she wants to spend her weekends. But give the other women the freedom to do so too. Why give the guilt trip to others about ‘family values’ etc. if she is not spending time with her won family.

We also have no problems with her looks. She looks fine for her age. but she does not have the brains…that matters to us as Americans. Especially after the stupid policies of Bush we need a real intelligent person as our president.

Folks, those particular pics are not of the “Blessed Sarah” although it wouldn’t surprise me if they are . After all, she puts her little daughter in high heels on a TV stage.

Good Grief! There is more repressed sexuality in the “Family Values” Christian right Republican party than you can shake a stick at. Republicans obviously had serious issues with their toilet training.

One thing IS for sure. The Theocratic jack-booted thugs of the Christian right Republican party haven’t learned a thing from Tues. They will continue to become more and more an extremist cult preaching a “man-walked-with-dinosaurs” & “science-is-the-devils-work” philosophy. I hope she runs in 2012. It will be the easiest victory yet for the Dems.

katie @ 89

i never mentioned family values so i don’t understand y u r aiming your comment at me ?? I also never mentioned her brain. i discussed the people who mock her for wearing a tshirt and shorts ’so soon after the election’ How sexist and mysoginistic is that. i also made clear i did not know her politics so could u clarify where your getting the your information from.

Is that even Palin?

It’s hard out there for ho, errr, her …

http://lifeisacookie.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/sarah-palin-is-vice-president-of-loungechairs/

Let me get this straight. We’re going to pass a health care plan written by a committee whose head said he doesn’t understand it, passed by a Congress that didn’t read it but exempts them from abiding by it, signed by a President who smokes and is also exempted, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn’t pay his taxes, overseen by a surgeon general who is obese and financed by a country that’s nearly broke. What could possibly go wrongIf she’s dim and Obama is brilliant, how did he lose the argument to her? The first we heard about Sarah Palin’s “death panels” comment was in a conversation last Friday with an acquaintance who was appalled by it. Our interlocutor is not a Democratic partisan but a high-minded centrist who deplores extremist rhetoric whatever the source. We don’t even know if he has a position on ObamaCare. From his description, it sounded to us as though Palin really had gone too far.

A week later, it is clear that she has won the debate.

President Obama himself took the comments of the former governor of the 47th-largest state seriously enough to answer them directly in his so-called town-hall meeting Tuesday in Portsmouth, N.H. As we noted Wednesday, he was callous rather than reassuring, speaking glibly–to audience laughter–about “pulling the plug on grandma.”

The Los Angeles Times reports that Palin has won a legislative victory as well:

A Senate panel has decided to scrap the part of its healthcare bill that in recent days has given rise to fears of government “death panels,” with one lawmaker suggesting the proposal was just too confusing.
The Senate Finance Committee is taking the idea of advance care planning consultations with doctors off the table as it works to craft its version of healthcare legislation, a Democratic committee aide said Thursday.
Sen. Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, ranking Republican on the committee, said the panel dropped the idea because it could be “misinterpreted or implemented incorrectly.” . . .
The Palin claim about “death panels” was so widely discredited that the White House has begun openly quoting it in an effort to show that opponents of the healthcare overhaul are misinformed.
You have to love that last bit. The fearless, independent journalists of the Los Angeles Times justify their assertion that the Palin claim was “widely discredited” with an appeal to authority–the authority of the White House, which is to say, the other side in the debate. One suspects the breathtaking inadequacy of this argument would have been obvious to Times reporters Christi Parsons and Andrew Zajac if George W. Bush were still president. And of course this appears in a story about how the Senate was persuaded to act in accord with Palin’s position–which doesn’t prove that position right but does show that it is widely (though, to be sure, not universally) credited.

Podcast
James Taranto on Palin and the “death panel” debate.

One can hardly deny that Palin’s reference to “death panels” was inflammatory. But another way of putting that is that it was vivid and attention-getting. Level-headed liberal commentators who favor more government in health care, including Slate’s Mickey Kaus and the Washington Post’s Charles Lane, have argued that the end-of-life provision in the bill is problematic–acknowledging in effect (and, in Kaus’s case, in so many words) that Palin had a point.

If you believe the media, Sarah Palin is a mediocre intellect, if even that, while President Obama is brilliant. So how did she manage to best him in this debate? Part of the explanation is that disdain for Palin reflects intellectual snobbery more than actual intellect. Still, Obama’s critics, in contrast with Palin’s, do not deny the president’s intellectual aptitude. Intelligence, however, does not make one immune from hubris.

For a wonderful example of such hubris, check out this post from David Kurtz of TalkingPointsMemo.com:

Is there anything quite as unsettling as when the nation’s political class (and I use that term broadly to encompass the occasionally political, like the tea partiers) turns its fleeting but intense focus to a new (for them) and complex topic, like end-of-life issues?
It seems like years of painstaking work to nudge our death-denying culture toward a more frank and humane approach to our own mortality and dying could be erased by one misguided national discussion set off by none other than Sarah Palin.
Except that Palin didn’t “set off” this discussion; President Obama did by trying to ram through legislation postalizing the medical system with no time for debate or reflection. How to care for dying patients is a serious, sensitive and complicated matter, one with which American families struggle every day. If you truly don’t want the “political class” involved, your quarrel is with the man who is pushing for more federal involvement in this most personal of matters.