Top Stories

Brad Pitt is Impervious to Poo, Snot, Urine and Vomit

Brad Pitt is Impervious to Poo, Snot, Urine and Vomit

Brad Pitt opens up to Oprah about partner Angelina Jolie and their six kids.

On how fatherhood has changed him: “[I'm] tough as nails. I’m impervious to poo, snot, urine, vomit. You can’t get me. You cannot break me down.”

On quick outings being a thing of the past: “We don’t go to the mall. It’s like a half-an-hour just to get everyone buckled in and make sure they’ve got their snacks, and Z.Z. [Zahara, 3] has got a blanket and Shiloh’s got her silky. Angie’s militant about it. She’s right on top of it. Thank God, because I’m always forgetting something.”

On 2½-year-old daughter Shiloh’s Peter Pan obsession: “She only wants to be called John. John or Peter. So it’s a Peter Pan thing. So we’ve got to call her John. ‘Shi, do you want …’ – ‘John. I’m John.’ And then I’ll say, ‘John, would you like some orange juice?’ And she goes, ‘No!’ So, you know, it’s just that kind of stuff

Watch Brad’s interview tomorrow on Oprah! The Curious Case of Benjamin Button costar Cate Blanchett will also be on the show. A preview of the show is on YouTube.

Unfortunately you can’t embed the video. Come on Oprah, be nice. Sharing is caring!!!

JJ Links Around The Web

  • LeAnn Rimes will legally be single in June 2010 - PopEater
  • Simon Cowell hangs out on a jetski - PopSugar
  • Pink has a fun last night on tour - LaineyGossip
  • Learn how to get perfect hair with Pauly D - Dlisted
  • Vanessa Hudgens puts her sneakers on - JustJaredJr
  • Brittany Murphy's autopsy is complete - TheSuperficial
  • Even off camera, the Gleeks love to sing - Celebuzz
Michael Buckner/Getty

1,050 Comments

Pages: « 135 36 37 [38] 39 40 4142 » Show All
Passing Through @ 11/21/2008 at 9:26 am

# 822 guli @ 11/21/2008 at 12:00 am

Thanks PT—your handy/hard work is now up on mega3a..many thanks again!!!!

http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/349687?page=826

++++++++++++++++

You’re welcome. Shortly after I uploaded the files my cable modem went out, so I was in internet hell the rest of the night. It’s still out this morning and I’m pissed because this is the 3rd time in 2 weeks they’ve had a service interruption of 4 or more hours. Don’t they know people have blogging addictions and shite like that?! B a s t a r d s. I called them just now and gave them an earful and made them pro-rate my bill for the nearly nearly 20 hours the service has been out. Petty, yes, but for $50 a month they can at least get the damned thing to work all the time!

Passing Through @ 11/21/2008 at 9:34 am

# 827 thelookoflove1365 @ 11/21/2008 at 12:24 am

Thanks PT- although it is hard to read. print too small for me.

+++++++++++++++

LOL. I guess I didn’t really think people would read them online. If you download them, then use the default XP program to view images, then you can use ZOOM to enlarge the image so it’s big enough to not have to squint. I scanned at 200dpi so that the images weren’t too big. I have a fast cable modem, but I wasn’t sure what other people were using. If, God forbid, you’re still using a traditional modem…get the cheapest DSL service available because the 256kbps DSL is still 5 times faster than a 56kbps modem.

The girl has stated everything in Vogue magazine, there was NO ROMANCE on set. There was friendship, partnership DUE TO WHAT THEY HAD TO DO WITH THE SCRIPT. The relationship later developed into real life love when he separated. I believe movie kept filming after the separation. LET’S END THIS TRIANGLE.

I’m just curious. Did NYT review Changeling? It seems that NYT is attacking Angie so i wont be surprised if it gave Changeling a bad review.

Burn @ 11/21/2008 at 9:38 am

I’m just curious. Did NYT review Changeling? It seems that NYT is attacking Angie so i wont be surprised if it gave Changeling a bad review.
________________________________________________-
Yeah they give Changeling bad review.

Passing Through @ 11/21/2008 at 9:47 am

# 827 thelookoflove1365 @ 11/21/2008 at 12:24 am


For anyone who had trouble reading the article because the print was too small - I increased the size of the images. Here are the links

i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag1-1.jpg
i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag2-1.jpg
i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag3-1.jpg
i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag4-1.jpg
i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag5-1.jpg
i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag6-1.jpg
i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag7-1.jpg
i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag8-1.jpg

I’m just curious. Did NYT review Changeling? It seems that NYT is attacking Angie so i wont be surprised if it gave Changeling a bad review.
__________________________________________________
The Times gave the changeling a bad review. The Times doesn’t have problems Brad only with angelina.

Let’s stop talking about lying tabloids and those who say negative things endlessly. Angelina ignores these people, why can’t we? This is the power that overcomes. Thanks for those who post positive reviews.

Passing Through @ 11/21/2008 at 10:06 am

# 828 nEW YORK TIMES @ 11/21/2008 at 12:28 am

NEW YORK TIMES OUTS JOLIE FOR THE MANIPULATIVE MEDIAHO SHE IS.
Angelina Jolie’s Carefully Orchestrated Image

++++++++++++++++++

BBBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA! That’s it? You consider THAT an “outting”? Geez…you’re incredibly stupid. There’s nothing in that article that hasn’t been said before. Notice that they quote Us magazine as saying Angie set up the photo op with Maddox. I don’t call them US LIES WEAKLY for nuttin’, moron! Once they put the lie out there, do you think they’re going to backtrack on it? Uh…no. The other stuff? Pfffffft. So Angie does her own dirty work - unlike X and JLo. So does this mean that the NYT is going after X next? Because X and Huvane work the press a hell of a lot harder than Angie does - as in constantly.

I’m kind of surprised the NYT wasted column space on this story. Anybody who didn’t know the info about Peeps is living in a bubble. Angie and Brad are NOT the only celebs Peeps makes these kinds of deals with. They’ve done it with every actor they’ve bought baby pictures from - and continually suck X’s big toe for no return on their investment at all. She routinely plays them…then turns around and denies the story she gave them to US. At least with Angie they get some nice pix of some really cute kids.

B-O-R-I-N-G. Next.

Alexanderina @ 11/21/2008 at 10:08 am

bdj, thanks for the news articles

Passing Through @ 11/21/2008 at 10:10 am

# 834 juju @ 11/21/2008 at 12:47 am

nEW YORK TIMES @ 11/21/2008 at 12:28 am
___________________________________

The thing i got out of that joke of an article is that Jennifer Lopez needs a “team of eight” to help take care of her image and her business and Angelina just needs her cellphone, a lawyer and her manager.

++++++++++++++++++

Exactly. And notice how, once again, Brad gets off scott free? Oh, I’m sorry, he was listed as one of Angie’s “helpers”. Btich, please. Brad’s handiwork is all up in this. HE is the one who declared he’d sell the pix himself.

One thing that does make me laugh though is that Angie is always saying they don’t take any gossip seriously and ask, “Is it in the NY Times?” This is the second time they’ve gone after her for doing the same thing everyone else does. I think she needs a new measuring stick of journalistic integrity….

Funny how the same time X is on the cover of the NY Times they write an article met to be negative about Angie. They are worst than a tab and should be ashamed of themselves or at the very least embarrassed that it has come to this.

gladgladglad @ 11/21/2008 at 10:14 am

Burn @ 11/21/2008 at 9:38 am

I’m just curious. Did NYT review Changeling? It seems that NYT is attacking Angie so i wont be surprised if it gave Changeling a bad review.
~~~~~~
YES!! The woman has never liked anything Angie does since she reviewed film for the L.A. Times. She says she can’t get past AJ’s notoriety. I say “stop reviewing her films if you know you can’t be objective!!”

the real lou @ 11/21/2008 at 10:14 am

929 ???? @ 11/21/2008 at 9:52 am The Times gave the changeling a bad review. The Times doesn’t have problems Brad only with angelina.

****************************
I just love have you need to dramatize everything.Manohla Dargis(who is the movie critic for the NY Times) hates Angelina and always has.(even before she hooked up with Brad)So let’s be real ,the b*tches reviews are biased to say the least.NY Times just had a very nice interview with Angelina for Changling.God,you whine more than my 5 year old daughter.And your need to blame Brad for everything you deem as “wrong” is boarding on mental.

the real lou @ 11/21/2008 at 10:23 am

#931 Passing Through @ 11/21/2008 at 10:06 am ….It is boring.What do you want to bet certain whinny ass posters will park on this thread ALL DAY long complaining about this lame ass article.Have a nice afternoon everyone,I’m going Christmas shopping!

I think what fans should care about is if they are not nominated for Oscars if they truly deserve to be.

Exactly!!!! She has to bear her soul and expose how heartbroken she was by his cheating, but he doesn’t have to face that fact that he broke her heart and publicly humiliated her w/ a brother kissing, relationship breaking (not her first or last), blood vial wearing, knife loving chick? So he doesn’t have to face his past behavior and acknowledge that he’s a cheater and a liar? Utterly unfair and not a good friend to Jen, Oprah.

http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/93215;jsessionid=ac11067e30d87de758873a7c4e65bc67e524f04e6072.e3qNbhyLc3iNe3uLb3uRbN8Mai0?start=30&tstart=0
___________________________________________
Cloniqua lookie! Branloonie fans need help lol

The NYT article was not that bad. It started out snarky but I found it was very complimentary in some ways of Angie. It portrays her as a very savvy person. Did you read the comments on the article? It was fairly positive.

The main point of the article even if they tried to be snarky is that she took charged of her image and came out on top. Who else in hollywood doesn’t want that kind of control for their image? Everyone wants that, that is why you have a PR team. The thing about Angie, as the article noted, is that she does this on her own and without any PR team. It is just her, her lawyer and manager. Now that is powerful.

So whatever to you haters calling her a mediawhore she is a mediasavvy person.

I HAVE WON A PART IN NEW MOVIE ‘INTERNET TROLL’ . A COMEDY ABOUT PEOPLE WHO WRITE NEGATIVE COMMENTS AGAINST CELEBRITES ON THE INTERNET IN COMMENT SECTIONS,BLOGS, FORUMS ETC.

I hate angelina jolie because i have no life and she is everything i want to be

-=--=-=-=-90p'#[n../\ku @ 11/21/2008 at 11:12 am

i know. let’s have a card-board cut-out of angelina on oprah, then have all the haters, trolls and hate-filled freaks out there phone in and via webcam and hate on angelina, call her names and generally bully her, and see how much of a psycho you all will look like

-=--=-=-=-90p'#[n../ku @ 11/21/2008 at 11:21 am

let’s also see if JUST JARED.COM or USMAGAZINE.COM picks up and makes a post out the NYT article.

passing Through @ 11/20/2008 at 11:07 pm

Okay…here are the US Lies Weakly Scans of “How Angie DOES NOT Torture Fuglyston”.

Page 1 - i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag1.jpg
Page 2 - i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag2.jpg
Page 3 - i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag3.jpg
Page 4 - i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag4.jpg
Page 5 - i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag5.jpg
Page 6 - i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag6.jpg
Page 7 - i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag7.jpg
Page 8 - i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/RealityChick691/Us-Mag8.jpg

_____________________________________________

The most interesting part from this is about Brad feeling indifferent towards X. He feels nothing. He wishes her well but doesn’t have any left over feelings for her. I didn’t need US magazine to tell me that, but it was nice to see it in print. Any person who payed attention would know this. Remember how he reacted when he things ended with Paltrow? He was angry and distraught. X was aware of it because she was insecure of Paltrow. This is what really makes X angry. She wants a reaction out of Brad and for four years, she hasn’t been able to do it. That’s why Bill Swecker (Aniston Hack) wrote that story about Brad furiously calling X to shut up. Huvane played coy by saying it was a private matter. He wouldn’t say yes or no to give the impression that Brad did call. This is what X wants. She wants the public to think that she does matter and she can get a reaction out of Brad if she wants. Of course, Brad’s every action for the past four years says otherwise. Brad has been smart not to react in any way. His interview with Oprah says everything. He mentioned Angie’s name so many times and couldn’t stop talking about the kids. He’s happy and oblivious to X. hehehe

Pages: « 135 36 37 [38] 39 40 4142 » Show All

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.