Jennifer Aniston Covers NY Times Magazine
Jennifer Aniston opens up about her TV and movie career in this weekend’s New York Times Magazine. Here are some highlights via Us Weekly:
On her new movie’s title: “I wish it was She’s Just Not That Into. Unfortunately, it’s He’s Just Not That Into You. The other would be more empowering.”
On finding success after Friends ended in 2004: “I thought I’d never get movies.”
On landing her role of spoiled Rachel Green: “[It was] the first time I felt like part of the cool kids.”
On watching Friends re-runs on TV: “There are times I don’t even remember that particular show. This is horrible to say, but there are times when I laugh my rear end off. And I get in debates with people who are over and say, Friends is not my thing.’ Excuse you!”
On if Friends would be a hit today: “Hard to tell — that was a different time. Now TV has too much to do with celebrity. We have reality television, where people try to become celebrities….”
Aniston’s next comedy, Marley & Me, costarring Owen Wilson opens on Christmas Day.








Older











233 Comments
By the way, what’s up with her mouth? Her lips look weird. :lol:
i absolutely love jennifer aniston!!! friends is my favorite show =)
Angelina, stop signing on to post negative crap about Jen. Aren’t you getting enough media attention with your boring media blast about anything and everything in your life/
she looks like a tranny
If she is ugly, then what are you? She isn’t drop dead gorgeous, but she isn’t ugly. HONESTLY who here thinks they look better than her? Honestly…
Geeze! Doesn’t anyone have any shred of human kindness anymore? What is up with all the cruel & degrading comments? I’m not a Jennifer Aniston fan myself and can’t proclaim to be an expert on the controversies surrounding her issues with Angelina or Brad, but c’mon people, is the meanness necessary?
The lot of you can’t forgive JA for her trash talk and not being able to move on, but from the way most of you are behaving, I’d say that you’re no different.
My apologies if I’ve offended anyone, but I really am appalled at the lack of humanity on this forum.
What could the NY Times be thinking? There is just nothing interesting about this person - she barely acts, she barely works, she has no interesting hobbies or passions, she has never had anything intersting to say in interviews I have either read or watched, and she seems to love a very small life when she has been given very large rewards. There are so many worthy actresses who deserve this and whose lives are more interesting.
I’m not going to put down her appearance because that’s an individual taste and lord knows every woman on the planet can look good with that type of money and attention. It’s just that as a woman she embarrasses me for her inertia and her superficial and almost childlike discourse.
love jen so much
nice cover, much better than vogue
LMAO #53!!!
The beautiful Jen. Oh great, first the Jolie fans had to boycott US Weekly, now the NY Times, what will they read?????????????????
I guess they will just have to watch Oprah (wink) !!
nice poster
not much else 2 say
Oh cr@p, Oprah had Jen on last week. Funny they don’t boycott that too! LMAO!
Holy photoshop, Chiniston!
Her nose is wider than this, and her lips are waaaaay thinner than this.
Fake fake fake!
Ugly tranny.
Gawd, please spare us this ugly, whiny, dumb, rancid b*tch!
She’s gorgeous.
WHATEVER!!!! STOP COPY FROM ANGIE’S SAME PICTURE THIS…
On her new movie’s title: “I wish it was She’s Just Not That Into. Unfortunately, it’s He’s Just Not That Into You. The other would be more empowering
She tries hard, doesn’t she? It hurts watching her try to be a big, badass woman with nary a care in the world for men and men things, when the reality is she is not even close to that kinda woman.
Seriously, JA…quit, just stick with the damsel in distress, woman child image, okay?
By the way, who else finds it funny that they ask about FREINDS? After how many years and how many movies, they still ask her how she felt getting the Rachael role. Rotflmao!
Thank You NY TIMES MAGAZINE, I owe ya one :)
GORGEOUS!!! THIS WOMAN IS CLASSY, RESPECTABLE NOT JUST IN HER FACE BUT HER OVERALL APPEARANCE FROM HEAD TO TOE. SKANKALINA HAS NOTHING OVER THIS WOMAN.
YOU GO JEN!!!
IT’S YOUR TURN NOW!!! LET BRANLOONIE HAVE ALL THE BABIES.
Not a fan of any of the 2 teams, but Honestly i find her pretty here , especially her eyes and hair they look pretty hot .
SORRY Jen, but they definitely photoshopped your picture so you could look like Angelina. Tsk. Tsk. Tsk.
John-Boy must have peed in her eye.
Love,
Alissa
http://www.captain-obvious.com/alissa/
shes looks hot,id do her…..
how is that a “stolen” pose? that look has been around before any of us were even born so dont even try that ****
Woaw it’s incredible how jen make the lonnies loosing thier sh!t LMAO look at theme bwahahahhaahah it’s funny to watch they are getting crasy wide, she has one influencial power .
Yeah she really cares about empowering women. Yet, last week she was trashing Angelina and praising the man who left her.
didn’t Angelina just posed like that for brad? what a jealous fug, hag, sorry Jen, you will never ever be as hot,,sophisticated, talented and spectacular as the beautiful Angelina. so phony you are, oh!! i don’t know how i am still doing movies, if she starts fading, she gets desperate and starts going to high profile places where she knows photogs are going to be, or she brings up brad/angie’s name, fame seeker, another Paris Hilton, but a lot older, and people fall for it all over again, that’s why it won’t end.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 … 10 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!