OlderNew ‘Benjamin Button’ Stills!
Check out these awesome new stills of Brad Pitt as Benjamin Button and Cate Blanchett as his love interest, Daisy, in the upcoming time traveler’s tale The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.
The film was adapted from the 1920s story by F. Scott Fitzgerald about a man who is born in his eighties and ages backwards. Fifth picture below: A healing preacher (Lance E. Nichols, left) seeks to help Benjamin (Pitt, sitting) who has been brought to the convocation by Queenie (Taraji P. Henson, center).
Button opens everywhere on Christmas Day, December 25. Check out the official movie site at BenjaminButton.com.
The Hollywood Reporter calls the film “an intimate epic about love and loss that is pure cinema.”
10+ new movie stills of Benjamin Button…
Share This Post:
670 Comments
OT - Even the LA Times is going there :lol:
The Big 10′: Who needs a Hollywood bailout?
Jennifer Aniston
The glory days: In the nineties, Jennifer Aniston was riding high. She landed the role of superficial-yet-lovable Rachel Green on “Friends,” an entire generation of women copied her hairdo, and she won an Emmy for best lead actress. Then, in 2000, she married golden boy Brad Pitt in a lavish Malibu ceremony, and in 2002 she gained indie cred with “The Good Girl.” Who could ask for more?
Troubled times: After Aniston and Pitt called it quits — and Pitt started dating Angelina Jolie - Aniston was painted as a victim. Recently, Aniston’s on-and-off relationship with John Mayer has come under the microscope, amid rumors she is pregnant. Jen’s appearance on “30 Rock” did little to buoy her falling star; the episode garnered the lowest ratings of the season. An appearance on “Oprah” and a jab at Jolie in a “Vogue” interview only provided further fodder for media scrutiny.
Bailout plan: Appealing as it is to cozy up to Oprah and gush, you may want to adopt the phrase “no comment” with regards to all things Brad and Angelina. And as for your unlucky-in-love image, how about trading in the actors and musicians for a regular guy? Get out of the spotlight and focus on what you love: acting! Why not star in a Broadway play? Added bonus: you’ll get out of L.A. for a while.
http://www.latimes.com/en…125150233,0,1723296.photo
(George Burns / Associated Press)
missy @ 11/25/2008 at 10:54 pm
btw, I watch Brad on Oprah almost everynight with smile from ear to ear. :lol:
Oh brother… Someone REALLY needs to bust a cap in the noggins of TIIC at OuttaTouch. For the last 3 weeks they’ve been on this ridiculous jag that Angie’s pregnant again. They claim she’s OVER 3 months preggers. I think they need to go back and take a female physiology class and have someone explain to them about how long it takes a woman to start ovulating again after delivering a baby. Cuz the last time I checked it took a little longer than 3 weeks after giving birth. That and the fact that they’d have been advised to not have sex for up to 6 weeks. But hey…who am I…or science…to stand in the way of another hilarious Outta Touch lie? Oh yeah…a little thing like Geyer Kosinski denying she’s preggers phases Outta Touch….since it’s the 3rd consecutive week they’ve spun this tale the previous 2 issues must have sold well. The other thing that’s funny about this is…they did the exact same thing after Shiloh was born. Angie was seen with a little belly fat and they turned it into back-to-back pregnancies…only to write 3 months later that she was too thin and anorexic…everybody roll their eyes…
http://coverawards.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/intouchweeklycoverawardsmarkpasetskycoverawardsangelinajoliepregnant1.jpg
QQQQ @ 11/25/2008 at 10:54 pm OT - Even the LA Times is going there
The Big 10′: Who needs a Hollywood bailout?
Jennifer Aniston
The glory days: In the nineties, Jennifer Aniston was riding high. She landed the role of superficial-yet-lovable Rachel Green on “Friends,” an entire generation of women copied her hairdo, and she won an Emmy for best lead actress. Then, in 2000, she married golden boy Brad Pitt in a lavish Malibu ceremony, and in 2002 she gained indie cred with “The Good Girl.” Who could ask for more?
Troubled times: After Aniston and Pitt called it quits — and Pitt started dating Angelina Jolie - Aniston was painted as a victim. Recently, Aniston’s on-and-off relationship with John Mayer has come under the microscope, amid rumors she is pregnant. Jen’s appearance on “30 Rock” did little to buoy her falling star; the episode garnered the lowest ratings of the season. An appearance on “Oprah” and a jab at Jolie in a “Vogue” interview only provided further fodder for media scrutiny.
Bailout plan: Appealing as it is to cozy up to Oprah and gush, you may want to adopt the phrase “no comment” with regards to all things Brad and Angelina. And as for your unlucky-in-love image, how about trading in the actors and musicians for a regular guy? Get out of the spotlight and focus on what you love: acting! Why not star in a Broadway play? Added bonus: you’ll get out of L.A. for a while.
http://www.latimes.com/en…125150233,0,1723296.photo
(George Burns / Associated Press)
—-
:lol: “lol” :lol: :lol:
This make my day. :lol: :lol:
# 126 QQQQ @ 11/25/2008 at 10:54 pm
OT - Even the LA Times is going there
The Big 10′: Who needs a Hollywood bailout?
Jennifer Aniston
===============================================
ROTFLMBO, love it. The woman has become a joke and everybody knows it. Thanks for posting
HUGE fan of Cate’s (greatest actress on earth) and I really really want her to win Best Actress this year! It’s been way too long! This movie looks absolutely breathtaking and has been generating all kinds of BP buzz, I can’t wait to see it!
I think when the VOGUE magazine’s Van Meter asked Jennifer Aniston about Angelina Jolie, she should have simply said “No comment”. I think Jennifer has learned a big lesson. I don’t think she will ever talk about Brad or Angelina ever again.
http://www.jenniferanistonwatch.com/vogue-scans-and-the-new-york-times/img017/
# 128 passing Through @ 11/25/2008 at 11:02 pm
PT, that bullsh*t story that Angie is pregnant again just tell you how really outtatouch that piece of rag is. The people at that rag is beyond pathetic
LOL at the OuttaTouch cover. “Angelina can’t stop talking about the baby”. That’s news to us her fans, who watch and read all her interviews. “Brad is not thrilled”? Well, I guess we have to ask the millions who watched Oprah the other day when Brad was on her show saying “I dare say” to her “You’re happier than you have ever been”. I guess he didn’t know then that Angelina is pregnant again. Hahahaha.
4Q–^^^ that is hilarious..thanks for the linl and post :lol:
an oldie @ 11/25/2008 at 11:24 pm
“Brad isn’t thrilled”? He’s the one who’s been talking about having more kids, not Angie.
At any rate, I don’t think they will have any more natural kids. I think they will adopt one more in another year or two, and call it quits at seven.
I think the “UnCOOK” and THE FUG are one and the same person and is GAY or both Crazy jenhag fans who pretend to be a man. Notice they are the only “male” who blogs on JJ almost everyday.
COOK + FUG = DESPERATE FAGGOTS
Year end is coming.
Dont forget to donate. All contributions are tax deductible.
If you do good, good will follow you !!!
http://www.makeitrightnola.org
There are many houses waiting to be built.
Love Brad & Angie. Can’t wait to see it.
Nice vid…
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=ERQ0uCN76j4
Oh yeah — whatever happened to that baby bump Outa Touch said Aniston was carrying? I always said one good **** would deflate that “baby bump”. Looks like Jenny-poo laid an egg because the bump disappeared overnight.
Actually, I do think they will another natural child. Unless Angie had her tubes tied (which I doubt) she will get pregnant again. Possibly after her next movie or while filming it. They seem to be a very fertile and very sexed couple. So why not….she can handle it, they can handle it together. Brad seems to adore her like crazy, he is probably very protective of her (i.e. last photocall in London).
Look if I had the kind of resources they have…I would have lots and lots of children. And please I dont want to hear anything about nannies, nannies are there for the mundane tasks while mum have more time for children.
However, she cannot be 3 months pregnant now, after a cesarian you need at least 6 weeks. Unless Angie got pregnant while shooting the W magazine shoot. She did say “things sorta got out of hand” With those two one can only imagine. Even then she would not be 3 mts pregnant.
Oh well, I think they are great anyway!
I have not made comments about Brad’s ex because the old triangle is tiresomes. But with all the talk recently about who is and is not uncool, let me just say this. JA had a publicist and PR team in 2005 and was promoting at least 3 movies in 2005. Angie had no publicist or PR team (still doesn’t) and she and Brad stayed away from public appearances until after his divorce was finalized. So Angie was beat up on to further JA’s career. JA used the divorce to further her movie career and Angie was the real victim. Angie had no publicist to protect her from all the negative press planted by the JA people and the haters. Also JA lashed out at Brad over the W photoshoot because he was telling the world through photos that what looks like a happy marriage could in fact be the exact opposite. Then this year JA lashes out at Angie because Angie talks about how she was developing feelings for Brad during MAMS. Again I think Angle is really letting the world know that there was no perfect marriage to break up. When Angie talks about that time period, remember she is intelligent, caring, sensitive and candid. Just listen to her talk or read her interviews. So I think she is not being insensitive to JA, but is letting people in on the dynamics during that time period. I suspect Brad and JA were probably living separate lives before MAMS began. I think Angie and Brad became close on the set. That is obvious but I believe them when they say they started their relationship after his legal separation. Both Brad and Angie are intelligent, sensitive, caring individuals. So their comments about that time period are very telling. JA wants to play the victim by victimizing Brad and Angie when she had movies to promote. It’s a pity the media is so gullible.
I agree with you Val…..I also think they will have one more bio and one more adopted child. Then they will have four of each. Even numbers. Unless, gawd forbid, they have mulitiples again.
Loved the LA times piece………went over and posted.
Thanks passing Through. I read some where that Doubt wasn’t that good. I don’t remember where, but it was on line somewhere. I just want Brad and Angie to get nominated and win. Peace
an oldie @ 11/25/2008 at 10:42 pm
——————————————————–
I uploaded the interview (from simply brad) on rapidshare and links are below:
rapidshare.com/files/165803466/oprah111908p1.wmv
rapidshare.com/files/165809306/oprah111908p2.wmv
rapidshare.com/files/165824549/oprah111908p3.wmv
One more adoption and call it quits at 7!
Brad will have the SEVEN he has ALWAYS wanted.
Most likely another Ethiopian little girl like ZZ.
I think they will adopt another child from Ethiopia or another African country — or maybe from Latin America?
Pages: « 1 … 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 … 27 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!