Brad Pitt: I Have An Unusual Family

if this hag is shy, why on god’s green earth don’t she stay the hell out of the media, for god sake, she can’t go to the bathroom without calling the paps, ….ivy anyone? seeing her fug face every where, shallow, dumb as bricks, she has nothing to offer, yet she brings attention to herself, WTH is wrong with her? she’s crazy,…. then her lap dogs come on here and try to convince us that there is nothing wrong with what she is doing, bwaahahahahaha, please, enough already,…not only is chinnifer foolish, she’s making fools out of her defenders. lol. is that what they call poetic justice? just asking.

Aniston, Huvane and the NYT: A Conspiracy

Something to think about….

I hadn’t read Angelina’s interview where she supposedly made the ‘fall in love on MAMS set’ comments (paraphrasing) - in the NYT.

I had HOWEVER, seen the FULL quote in an overseas publication and it’s clear to anyone reading it, that she is speaking of the movie and the characters of John&Jane Smith.

What the NYT did apparently was take that full quote, truncate it, and mischaracterize it by writing in an expository way around it…I think it appeared something like, ‘Angelina says she worries about what her kids may read on the internet, and talks about them “seeing their parents fall in love.” NYT ends the quote there.

The full quote apparently reads more fun and light-hearted, and it’s clear she is talking about the film, again I’m paraphrasing, but she says something like, “when the kids watch MAMS they’ll think it’s so funny seeing their parents try to kill each other and fall in love.”

Now for the ‘Huvaniston’ conspiracy, pay close attention:

As we KNOW Angelina, did that NYT interview several weeks maybe even a couple months after Aniston did her Vogue piece.

I firmly believe that at some point Aniston and Huvane, got word that Vogue was going to run the Aniston cover shot that featured her b*tchy catty immature response to Angie’s 2 year old quote (a benign comment in a two year old Vogue). They FREAKED OUT. (as Aniston recently said, “I was bummed about it.”) Not only that, they knew once readers were inside, Vogue would feature JA laughing re the ’shotgun’ comic strip, and the inference that “things were happening that I wasn’t aware of.” It was essentially Aniston & Huvane TRYING to slap a scarlet letter on Angelina, way worse than 2005!

Their (Aniston & Huvane’s) only problem?? They KNEW they would face a backlash, that would go something like this: Why, for the love of GOD, is Aniston bringing up a 2yr old Vogue interview NOW?!! She’s doing it to get press for her movie!! What a desperate publicity wh*re! What’s she yapping about, ‘things were going on she wasn’t aware of?” Isn’t SHE the one who spilled the beans on Brad telling her he was attracted to Angie? How sick, joking about harming a young Mom of 6 kids with a shotgun!

‘Huvaniston’ KNEW she would be considered a pathetic sore loser who was STILL NOT OVER IT.

Add to that, JA would be accused of trying to DEFLECT criticism away from recently hooking up again with a boytoy who had creepily dumped her in front of dozens of paparazzi.

Their (Huvane’s and Aniston’s) solution??

Smear Angelina.

Get someone in the media to CREATE a contrived controversy BEFORE Aniston’s Vogue hit the stands!

Enter, the New York Times.

First, they twisted Angelina’s words to read as if she said she and Brad ‘fell in love on set.’ That’s NOT what she said - see above. But they did that - and then Huvane took it from there, and spread it like wildfire across the web, to bloggers first, then tabloids, then mainstream mags and rags.

It BLEW UP.

It was now a MANUFACTURED ‘given’ (as well as a LIE ) that Angelina supposedly inadvertently admitted to she & Brad ‘falling in love,’ on set.

The fact that no one knew when MAMS wrapped, and when Brad and Aniston split was of no consequence. The only thing that mattered is what the public perception was, no matter how FALSE: which is that the film (and thus ‘falling in love’ ) was shot BEFORE the split happened and/or marriage ended.

Nevermind that a lot of things happened before Aniston and Brad were technically ‘divorced,’ her relationship with Vaughn, Shiloh’s conception, Brad & Angelina’s adoption of Zahara, etc. That didn’t matter - some of the bitter public was now able to say to Jolie, ‘gotcha!’ According to the timeline in their jealous minds, and the DELIBERATE misinterpretation of Angelina’s original quote, BY THE NYT, the misconstrued remark was now a confession.

Are you with me??

Aniston & Huvane, KNOWING their Vogue with the Angie quote is following hot on the heels of this explosive inadvertent ‘reveal,’ by Angelina as it was painted-are on much better ground NOW aren’t they?? So it comes out - and people are already PRIMED to go after Angelina! Mission Accomplished-almost.

Aniston’s Vogue remarks to some seem bitter, many say it shows she is still ‘not over it’-and she gets A LOT of heat. Not as much as she would have gotten had the NYT not misinterpreted AJ’s remarks and the tabloids blown up a couple weeks before, but enough heat that Aniston has some ’splainin’ to do on Oprah.

Well, we know what happens,which supports my conspiracy theory: Aniston is grilled & spoonfed the made-up NYT comment by her pal Oprah, when we all KNOW that’s not what she thought ‘uncool.’ Oprah plays along with the CAA/Huvane lie.

No less than 2weeks later we get the NYT BrooksBarnes smear. Piling on AJ.

http://media.www.thetriangle.org/media/storage/paper689/news/2008/12/05/ArtsEntertainment/Fincher.Crafts.button.Into.Cinematic.Piece.Of.Art-3572210.shtml

Fincher crafts ‘Button’ into cinematic piece of art
Sean Smith

Issue date: 12/5/08 Section: Arts & Entertainment

The idea may seem a little ridiculous: A person is born as an 80-year-old man and then progresses to age backwards, getting younger each year.

You would think that this is comedic and in no way able to be a dramatic film, but David Fincher’s “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” takes this concept and crafts it into a beautiful piece of cinema in both a narrative and visual manner.

From New Orleans at the end of World War I in 1918 into the 21st century, on a journey as unusual as any man’s life could possibly be, the film tells the grand tale of a not-so-ordinary man, the people and places he discovers along the way, the loves he finds and loses, the joys of life and the sadness of death and what lasts beyond time.

Based on the short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” follows the life of the title character (Brad Pitt). The film begins during the post WWI celebrations as Benjamin’s mother dies during childbirth. After seeing his disfigured son (he has the appearance of an 80-year-old baby), Thomas Button abandons his child on the steps of a nursing home. Discovering the abandoned child, the nursing home’s housekeeper, Queenie (Taraji Henson), adopts the baby despite his deformity.

What follows is Benjamin’s childhood as an elderly man, his first encounter with Daisy (Cate Blanchett), the woman he is destined to be with, Benjamin’s time on a tug boat, and his involvement in the navy during World War II.

The story focuses also on the emotional path of Benjamin, like meeting his father for the first time, falling in love, and grappling with whether or not he can be a father while he is continuously growing younger. While Benjamin’s predicament is entirely peculiar, his journey highlights the complex emotions at the core of every life.

The ensemble gives an amazing performance as a whole but the biggest acknowledgment goes to Brad Pitt. His take on Benjamin Button is a refined, coming across as contemplative, not lazy.

“Many actors weigh a part based on what their character gets to do,” director David Fincher said. “Well, Benjamin doesn’t ‘do’ a lot, per se, but, man, he goes through an enormous amount. Brad was the perfect person. It’s the kind of role that would be passive in lesser hands.”

Fincher (Fight Club, Se7en) does an amazing job crafting Benjamin Button’s universe from the setting of 1940s New Orleans, which becomes a character of the story itself, to as far as Russia. The bizarre situation of Benjamin seems entirely plausible, letting the audience invest more in his relationships and journey than his reverse aging.

“He never left a stone unturned and he was there for every step of the way. He goes over everything - every grain of salt. You feel safe. I just felt I could jump feet first, eyes closed and I knew that Fincher would catch me,” Henson recalled of her experience working with the director.

Fincher also does wonders when working with his actors with not only their acting chops, but also prosthetics to showcase multiple ages. There was the use of “AnEmotion,” a new technology, which allowed Fincher to take Pitt’s facial expressions and mannerisms and place them onto another actor for the scenes of Benjamin’s early years. This fantastic use of technology looks so natural, one can hardly believe it.

Overall, “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” is great film that entertains, touches the heart, and lets your mind consider things that are fantastic and otherwise unbelievable. It is an emotional journey that clocks in at almost three hours, but it is well worth it.

“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” opens nationwide Dec. 25.

http://media.www.studentprintz.com/media/storage/paper974/news/2008/12/04/Entertainment/The-Student.Printzs.Top.10.Films.Of.2008-3570116.shtml

3. “Changeling”
Perhaps the most emotionally challenging film on the list, “Changeling” tells the true story of a woman desperately searching for her missing son in 1920’s Los Angeles. Angelina Jolie takes center stage in a powerful performance and Clint Eastwood provides masterful direction.

http://www.makeitrightnola.org

Good Morning all. Yes troll I am stubborn. You can’t keep a good woman down. I believer in being positive and promoting the positive. There are other blogs that celebrate the smears, lies and snark and welcome the crazed rants. BP and AJ are good people doing some good in the world. The past is the past and the world will be a better place if people embrace the present. Have a great day and make it a MIR day. Happy TGIF!!!! Check out Changeling this weekend if you have not seen it. I am looking forward to seeing the Benjamin Button movie. Thanks for all the updates Just Jared Sr. Peace to all.

Good morning, bdj. Just keep on posting your interesting articles. Better reading with my cup of coffee and bagel than the crap that haters love to drag the thread down with.

rainonyourparade @ 12/05
_________________
I don’t know, but I appreciate everyone. Thanks bdj.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5idPj46mRHRoqxAxuc11CS8dbXDHwD94SJ9P00
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Oprah Winfrey tops The Hollywood Reporter’s Power 100 list, an annual ranking of the most influential women in the entertainment industry.
The chairman of Harpo Inc. was selected “based on her dizzying array of Oprah-branded media and her immense cultural influence,” editor-in-chief Elizabeth Guider said in a statement Friday.
The Hollywood Reporter also ranks the industry’s highest-paid actresses each year. Angelina Jolie is No. 1, commanding more than $15 million a movie, followed by Julia Roberts and last year’s top earner, Reese Witherspoon.

Greetings fans… Thank you bdj for the articles, and dont worry about some trolls trying to dissuade you from posting real news. We welcome it.

Cliniqua, that post abt the X, Huvane and NYT - BINGO!!!

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=HAu7xmYw-Go

Changeling Young Actors interview - on Angelina Jolie Maddox

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=PeB4mqmVyPU&fmt=18

hottest couple

PLEASE HELP ME OUT COZ I DON’T KNOW HOW HW INDUSTRY WORKS.

I read in __ thread replying to the interviewer that she saw an hour of TCCOBB and that it is amazing.

now i don’t want to be critical, but two points:
1. HOW was she able to see an hour of the film and WHERE? does she have any access to the early screening of the movie? or is it just the trailer that she saw?
2. if she saw part of the film and thinks it is amazing, ISN’T IT LOGICAL that you would WANT TO SEE THE FILM TO THE VERY END, HOW THIS AMAZING FILM PANNED OUT? I prefer to read books than watching films, but i think it is the same - you would want to read a good book and finish it (i remember foregoing lunch just to finish a very good book) as in you would want to finish watching an amazing film. otherwise, you can not really say it is amazing.