Bronx Wentz Looks Just Like Mommy!

I am not buying Pete’s BS. He and Ashlee did not get the offer they wanted, and are embarrassed about how little money was offered them. So they come out with this lying BS.

We know damn well if they were offered a substantial amount of money for the first photos of their baby, they would jump at it.

poor kid

Kate: “Using Brad’s words about the “bounty” is laughable”….. exactly my thoughts when I read Pete’s blog. I thought about Brad’s interview with CNN. That was really a copycat statement … too bad there’s really no bounty on Bronx’s pictures. I never understood the popularity of this pair.

i dont believe this ****
i honestly think they werent offered anything since i doubt they would sell much
**** this lil *****, he looks like a ******
go pop some pills *****

Valerie I’ve heard that too - that’s why the tabloids leave them alone, they just don’t sell!

ahahaha “He looks like his mommy” >>> well, before or after surgery? LOL

It’s all BS. They weren’t getting offered the right amount of money so instead of being humiliated, they make up so crappy story and bring the Jolie0Pitts into it.

If they go offered the right amount of money, they would so sell their baby’s pics but no one is interested. Remember how they pimp themselves out for everything else? wedding, honeymoon, ASSley’s pregnancy, etc.

Spicylily THAILAND @ 12/12/2008 at 11:13 am Why did they talk about their baby’s picture like they’re A- listers ?
They”re surely not and never will be……….
They’re not a big deal, no no……….

How many people will care to see their baby anyway ?
Of course, most babies are cute especially in mommies and daddies’s eyes.

I think some celebs may think why BRAD and ANGIE’s baby photos
are worth so much more than their babies’.
Jealousy, I guess.

Brad and Angie use the money for charities to help less fortunate people and they’re absolutely right.

I’m glad Brad and Angie don’t make their own blog and post their baby pics for everyone to look, copy and then make money and get away.
Sorry, they are their own babies not public babies.

> thats funny cause you contradict what you say.

its ok for brangelina to sell the pics to a magazine cause they are giving to charity, but on their sites would be like making their babies public? you see how that sounds?

isnt putting the pics in a mag also public? hahaha youre funny.

by the way. cant a paparazzi get even better pics if he gets the mag and scans the pics? even better then taking a pic on a screen.

so you have no point.

and i know they somehow can secure the internet better so that people cant copie the pics and people shouldnt forget one thing?

if the pics are on a website for free to see.
why bother paying someone who copied the pics.

i still believe its a good point and celebs should consider this.

and by the way. the 14 million dollar that brangelina gained from those pics and that they will give to charity. they can give that money even without selling any pics. and again they can earn from their site.

if you have millions of people looking on youre site i know that you will somehow get something back for it.

for example they can have sponsors on their sites. those can pay to get their names on their while the pics are being shown.

Spicylily THAILAND @ 12/12/2008 at 7:39 pm To……………fara @ 12/12/2008 at 7:11 pm # 41

Thank you for repeating my statement.
I have NO COMNENT on your comment.

Peace.

> peace to you too.

by the way. no hard feelings. i was just standing by my point.

i know that sometimes when you write things they can come of harder then they were.

goodnight : )

Very true, covers of these two do not sell!

Hahahaha if the baby looks like Ashlee then it has that nasty big nose and horrible chin before she went under the knife….GROSS

I can’t believe this douche is likening himself to Brad Pitt…i’m just stunned, how this low tiered group of z-listers by by virtue of just having reproductive organs thinks they can liken themselves to one of the biggest movie stars on the planet..and akin their situation to his. If anything, hearing Wentz describe his purported ‘trouble,’ makes me astounded at what Pitt and his family go thru..let me put it to Wentz like this…if it’s this bad for you (keep in mind, I don’t know even know you or what you do - I just know you had a baby with Jessica Simpson’s sister..lolol ), imagine what it MUST be like for Pitt.

Sheryl Crowe, Gwyneth Paltrow, etc. have all sold their pics, the former gave to charity, the latter did not. I don’t judge any of them - I don’t really care.

BOTTOMLINE: as a public figure (as unfortunately the Simpsons and whoever they happen to be with are, laughably) your children will be public too. The public will get to know their names - as you’ve released that to the press. Their pictures will be taken as along as YOU remain in the public eye. You can take this insatiable need for irrelevant celebrity fawning that the tabloids have created and do something good with it or you don’t have to do anything. You can choose to release a pictorial yourself and not let tabloids and tabloid weeklies make millions off of you by making millions off them and doing good with it, or you can put it in a trust for your kid…or NOT.

The main thing you do NOT have to do, is write an essay JUSTIFYING what you’re doing either way, and then snidely judging other people in the entertainment industry who have. Just do it, or not. But shut up about it. but whatever you do, lose the delusion that we care.

I’m here only because of your snarky ‘pimp the baby out,’ comment. News bulletin idiot: the day you post your kid on a blog, or in a magazine pictorial, or take him with you to the zoo - his image becomes public.

If you really don’t want to pimp him out. Quit being a celebrity and go away.

If only we could be so lucky.