Top Stories

Nicole Kidman: Sunday Rose Check-Up!

Nicole Kidman: Sunday Rose Check-Up!

Nicole Kidman takes her beautiful daughter Sunday Rose, 6 months, to the doctor’s office for a check-up on Friday afternoon (January 9) in Nashville, Tenn.

The 41-year-old Aussie actress recently said that she she “squirmed” in her seat throughout the Sydney premiere of her latest movie, Australia because she was so uncomfortable watching herself on screen.

She said, “I can’t look at this movie and be proud of what I’ve done. I sat there, and I looked at Keith and went, ‘Am I any good in this movie?’ But I thought Brandon Walters and Hugh Jackman were wonderful. It’s just impossible for me to connect to it emotionally at all… I don’t usually see my films, but because of [director Baz Luhrmann] I had to see it. I saw Moulin Rouge. I’ve really only seen that and this in my whole career. It gets worse as I get older.”

15+ pictures inside of Nicole Kidman’s doctor’s office visit…

Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 18
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 19
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 20
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 21
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 22
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 23
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 24
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 25
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 26
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 27
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 28
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 29
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 30
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 31
Kidman-checkup nicole kidman sunday rose checkup 32

JJ Links Around The Web

  • The Kardashians want Oprah - PopEater
  • Victoria Beckham checks out Barneys - Popsugar
  • Ashley Tisdale to lend her voice to Santa - Just Jared Jr
  • George Clooney and Elisabetta Canalis hit Rome - Lainey Gossip
  • Courtney Love's rants appear on Facebook - Dlisted
  • Katie Couric's old sexy photos surface - TheSuperficial
  • Peter Facinelli thinks a Cullen Thanksgiving is weird - Celebuzz
Photo: WENN

127 Comments

# 1

yes, we have something in common, can’t watch your movies either without squirming in my seat as lifeless and boring as you play

# 2

If you say then why are you still doing movies?
There are WAAAY more deserving actors that can act.
This is true just because your beautiful doesn;t mean you can act.
I agree with Forbes she’s overpaid

# 3

She is the best actress and most beautiful woman ever. Her hot ass will be remembered in 200 years as the best butt ever !!!

# 4

I’m satisfied with her acting.

# 5

Well technically your not beautiful naturally since you use sooo much Botox

# 6

NICOLE KIDMAN TE AMO DEMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIS

# 7

Her comments are so disrespectful to her director and to the movie, and to herself. My mom always told me: “never talk about your flaws to other people, because they will see it” She should keep it to herself, trashing your job only makes you look incompetent, because if you don’t think you are doing a good job none is not worth it.

# 8

Hey look - her forehead is scrunched up!!! It’s a true miracle….

# 9

Don’t forget how high she set her standards.
And please leave her and her child alone. JJ can buy as many pictures from Katie the famewhorre Homely and Suri the publicity pawn as you want.
Just leave the true actress alone, and quite frankly, I found Nicole’s statement about not watching herself very philosophical and profound.

Wow, so the paps just happen to find her at the doctors office. What a coinsidence. Is the Nanny walking behind not allowed to walk within a certain number of feet? Can ruin the shot of mother & child?

Too cute! Thanks!

I don’t understand why the baby is NEVER dressed appropriately for the weather. Nicole always has a winter coat on, the baby has a light sweatshirt on and her poor little legs are hanging out. She is not even holding her properly, it looks like she is going to drop her any minute. Why doesn’t Nicole buy the poor baby a WINTER COAT????

It was not that cold here in Nashville last Friday.
I think Nicole is like other actors who do not like to watch theirselves on screen.

Quote, IN CONTEXT @ 01/11/2009 at 7:29 pm

Tsk tsk… once again, Jared did not do any fact-check.

Here’s the radio interview: http://www.2dayfm.com.au/entertainment/galleries/australia_premiere (segment called “Nicole Kidman on That Baby Bump”)

Here’s a writer who obviously has listened to the interview and gets it: http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/la-dispatch-the-perils-of-candor/

L.A. Dispatch: The Perils of Candor
By Michael Cieply

Even smart guys like Larry Mark and Bill Condon, who are producing this year’s Oscar ceremony, are going to have one heck of a time solving the show’s core problem: Movie stars, in any public forum, are increasingly terrified of being as interesting as at least some of them really are. Candor kills. Even an old bull like Clint Eastwood knows it. He could probably tell you more about the rough and tumble of Hollywood than anyone in the business. But put him in front of the camera on Oscar night, and he suddenly turns dull.

To understand why even the brightest stars have learned, in the Web-crazed world, to hit the dimmer, you need only take a look at what happened to Nicole Kidman in the last few weeks. Actually, go to Google, and enter the search terms Nicole and Kidman and Squirm. You’ll get more than 28,000 hits, many of them telling how Ms. Kidman “squirmed” when she saw her own performance in “Australia,” wasn’t proud of her work and fled Australia after seeing the movie. One great example of the species is here:

I’m not out to defend (or criticize) Ms. Kidman’s performance: I haven’t even seen “Australia,” as much as I’d like to get a look at all the season’s movies. But it’s hard not to be shocked at how her comments have been wrenched out of context when you listen to her original interview, with a couple of down-under radio hosts.

As it turns out, the hosts, Kyle and Jackie, were gushing about the glories of the movie. Ms. Kidman, meanwhile, was making some interesting points about the way actors experience their own work. Only twice, she said, had she ever watched her own work in public — “Australia” and “Moulin Rouge” — both times out of respect for the director, Baz Luhrmann. Sure, she said, looking at herself up on the screen made her squirm. But, she added, “I was amazed, actually,” at the movie. No, she wasn’t proud, because, when it comes to her own work, said Ms. Kidman, “I have no objectivity at all.” She went on to quote Stanley Kubrick, who once explained that the only time an actor can experience a role with untainted emotion is on first reading the script.

It was fairly sophisticated stuff. But she got burned badly, as Web sites and news outlets around the world plucked a few spicy comments. No need to weep for the stars, of course. But don’t be surprised when they clam up tight on Oscar night. For most, it’s much better to be safe than sorry.

Wouldn’t it great if the real quote she gave or the real thing is what is in the press and relentlessly reported instead of what someone embellished and claimed she said? Her interview is online, I have listened to it and boy, talk about having your words re-written.

Sunday is growing and very cute and her mummy looks wonderful, beautiful without makeup.

Americans didn’t love Australia but the rest of the world can’t seem to get enough of it, it crossed $100m in foreign markets this past week. Congrats, Nicole.

BOTOX facts @ 01/11/2009 at 7:43 pm

Botox does NOT change any one’s face.

It is only used to lessen the horizontal creases across the forehead. It is NOT injected in other areas of the face.

Very few also put a dab on the corner of the eyes, the crows-feet, it cuts the amount of crows-feet in half, but does not make them all go away. It does not in any way make the area unmovable or change the face, it simply takes off a few years of lines.

It seems many blogger believe what they read and have no idea what Botox is or how or where it is used.

An urban myth, no pun intended, has been created. As a Botox user, for years, I can tell you, my forehead is smoother, but I still raise my brows, can create lines and ripples and have many lines at the corner of my eyes when I smile. I wish it did work better.

I personally, do not like the lip plumper Nicole has put in her lips, but it’s none of my business. I think hundreds o factress do the same. Actually, I know they do, e.g., Meg Ryan. No one ever picks those women to pieces. It’s simply a witch hunt.

Nicole looks different because she has aged 21 years since Dead Calm. All of our faces change from 21 to 41 The absurdity is that people compare her photos from 20 years ago.

All of us have thinner faces, our fat pockets sink lower, our necks become saggy, our eyes droop, our noses look thinner (unless we gain over 20 lbs as we age).

The simple truth is a lifetime of dedicated sunscreen use does prevent wrinkles and diminish lines and freckles. Ever see a Dermatogists face BEFORE Botox was ionvented and lasers. They all looked fab, bc they ALL used sunscreen religiously.

The truth is Nicole has a saggy neck nad will need a neck lift in a bout 5 years becasue she is aging. All actors have this simple operation. Get over it. If your livlihood was your face, you would too.

It was 57 on Friday and the kid has a windbreaker on, seems like an appropriate coat to me.

Not a nanny @ 01/11/2009 at 7:51 pm

That’s the same personal assistant Kidman has had for years.

The baby is held normally Andi’s dressed appropriately, the leg of the pants simple road up.

I wish the damn tabloid paps would get the hell out of Nashville.

THEY ARE NOT WANTED.

ava alexis @ 01/11/2009 at 8:12 pm

Molly I think sunday rose is well dressed she have a hat long sleeve oneise and sock the child that is not appropriately dressed is suri cruise.

Nicole didn’t say that she said ,can’t bear to watch myself on the screen coz she was so freaked in Sydney premiere and she only saw the film as a favor to her director.

What’s pathetic is the pack of irresponsible “journalists” that simply reprinted the story, again without doing basic fact-checking.

other actresses have said essentially the same thing:
that they cant watch Themselves

Michelle Pfeiffer switches off the TV if any of her movies come on or Kate (Winslet) â??says she canâ??t stand to watch herself on screenâ?¦and found it an ordeal to go nude in her latest film All the Kingâ??s Menâ??.

anyway see the real story here from latimes

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedishrag/2009/01/nicole-kidman-a.html

Baftas Long List , Nicole in Best Actress category The other categories for australia are makeup and hair, visual effects, sound, costume design, cinematography, production design and music.

Good luck for her! coz her performance was superb

So far australia made an impressive numbers $151m Worldwide
Domestic $47,747,000 ,Foreign $103.500.000

from variety and boxofficemojo

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117998344.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

These women Can’t Take A Bad Picture, she is just beautiful

Sunday is a beautiful little girl. The pink hat is so cute

Get a life! @ 01/11/2009 at 8:18 pm

How is a long sleeved onesie and a velour track suit with socks and a hat not dressed for Nashville? Sounds more like an ignorant blogger is trying to aside the sins of Katis onto Nicole.

Kidman wasn’t having a day outside and is not wearing coat, it’s a thin blazer and was obviously a quick walk from car to the pediatrician’s office.

she-whom-shall-not-be-named @ 01/11/2009 at 8:22 pm

Nicole looks like it’s the first time she’s held a baby, look ow awkward she looks carrying her own child!

Then why is Nicole wearing a heavier coat than the baby?

I just read the last stupid remark. It is not a blazer, it looks like a wool coat. Also, if you look back at every picture the baby is not dressed properly and at one point Nicole is putting the baby INSIDE OF HER COAT. Simple common sense tells you that a baby should be dressed at least as warmly as her mother.

Sunday is 7 months old already. I wonder how many teeth she’s got so far. minimum 4.

Jaqueline @ 01/11/2009 at 8:26 pm

Who are these freaks?

THAT is HOW you carry a baby and that is not a coat, it’s a very thin fitted blazer.

I question the intelligence of these comments and now believe the Kieth Urban fans have arrived to spew hate.

Give up, Keith married Nicole, he will never date you, no matter how many names you make up.

Lindsay #5
her forehead in the mean pic are moveing so Get over

molly 12#

At least she wears a hat and not with a summer clothes

Jaqueline @ 01/11/2009 at 8:34 pm

MOLLY.

I LIVE IN NASHVILLE, it wasn’t cold.

I don’t know who pissed in your Cheerios today, but you obviously cannot tell the difference between a fitted blazer which is hugging Kid man’s thin shoulders and a winter coat. I also wear blazers with jeans and they are not coats.

It is also obvious you’re a bizarrely hateful Kidman hater with an unhealthy aggressive streak. Me thinks the post that angered you hit to close to the truth!

Seek therapy.

Jaqueline,

Before you make uninformed comments, you should learn how to spell.

Keith is not spelled with the “i” first.

Secondly, I could care less if KEITH married Nicole. I am talking about how she dresses the baby.

I didn’t get your last comment about him never dating me no matter how many names I make up? That makes no sense whatsoever.

Keith was not even mentioned in any of my comments. I just think Nicole needs to dress the baby warmer.

The baby looks dressed for Nashville weather. This is not a Katie Holmes move where she is taking the child outside in no stockings, a short sleeved dress and it is 40 degrees out. The baby’s feet and head is covered and she has a coat on. Nicole is wearing her usual blouse/sweater type combo with a light coat. What’s the big deal here?

Jaqueline @ 01/11/2009 at 8:41 pm

The deal is that Molly is a one of those net freaks who live to argue and spout vitriol. I doubt she has ever been to Nashville.

This is my last comment to all of you psychos.

I am not a Kidman hater ( Kidman is one word Jaqueline).

I merely mentioned that I thought the baby should be dressed warmer, obviously someone pissed in your Cheerios Jaqueline, or you wouldn’t have attacked me over a simple comment.

I think you need to seek therapy, or you wouldn’t be fighting with people you don’t even know…….over celebrities that you don’t know.

Or maybe in your head you think you know Nicole? Are the little voices talking to you again?

Jaqueline, Your last comment makes no sense at all. I have no idea what you are are trying to say.

FYI, I live 30 minutes outside of Nashville, so yes I do know what the weather is like.

I’m done arguing with dim witted people.

MOLLY is a Pisser @ 01/11/2009 at 9:00 pm

Not falling for it, go back tothe Urban hate sites.

JJ i love you for posting these pictures but please listen to what nicole said and quote it in context. i cant believe that interview was in november and everyones picking it up now. it’s actually kinda sad.

it other news, sunday is a gorgeous baby. they look so cute!

If it was 57 F in Nashville, the baby should have had a jacket and her legs covered, or had a blanket wrapped around her. This isn’t the first time that NK has been out of doors in the cool weather, wearing a jacket herself, but with Sunday under dressed.

If the Kidman fans want to justify that, go ahead. But all it does is prove that you are unable to look at this objectively and recognize that the child is not dressed properly. God forbid anyone stick up for the helpless baby if it doesn’t reflect well on NK.

I would think that the child’s best interests would be the priority. Good gawd.

GAwd's Sake @ 01/11/2009 at 9:14 pm

The baby is wearing pants and jacket, and a oneise, and a hat, and socks to be carried a few feet.

I see the troll has posted a few times, same old, same ole.

What a cute cozy little warm-up suit. wonder where she bought it?

brittanyh @ 01/11/2009 at 9:15 pm

Poor baby, has Nicole Kidman as a mother and looks like her daddy. In this case, that’s not such a terrible thing. LOL

It was fairly warm in Nashville Friday, the baby didn’t need a winter coat. She has on a hat, so her legs are exposed, so what? She was fine. (I was walking around barefoot that day). She looks very healthy. I love babies with chubby cheeks and chubby legs.

I’ve heard Nicole make that comment about movies before, that’s old news.

Leave it to a blog to use the quote in it’s entirety. So called News Outlets have been picking it apart. I like Nicole, I’ve met her. She’s very sweet and lovely. I thought Australia was fabulous. People just won’t cut her a break…If something fails, it’s her fault…does one person have that power? Um…no.

CUTIE PAHTOOTIE! @ 01/11/2009 at 9:18 pm

What a chunky little monkey!

Her little pants are riding up to expose her chunky little fat baby legs.
I bet Sunday is a good little eater :)

Patti @ 01/11/2009 at 9:10 pm

Well Patti I think you are way overreacting. If the baby were in danger of freezing to death, I tihnk even we, Nicole’s ardent fans, would comment on it. The baby looks happy, doesn’t look in distress, isn’t hiding her little face, isn’t doing anything to indicate she is cold. Babies tend to run hot and Sunday is a little chunk right now–very very healthy and happy looking. And if you notice Nicole is carrying a blanket just in case.

im pretty sure nicole knows whats best for her baby.

its kinda pathetic that people just pick away at silly things just for the pure reason to say something against nicole. just get over it already

Love Nicole and Sunday Rose.

Glad there have been no pics since Xmas day.

This intrusion aside, it seems they are actually being left alone to lead a private life of sorts.

This molly girl spreads hate everywhere. I think she has a sickness or something (seriously) Time for your meds again Molly, stop the hate.

I agree with Patti. There have been too many pictures of NK taking this baby outside underdressed. But if you worship someone, they can do no wrong in your eyes, and so, her fans will always justify her actions. You guys should relax and try to see things more objectively.

I’m not anti - NK. I actually think she’s a good actress. But I am not going to justify her taking the baby out in cool weather without a blanket. She did that at least twice in Europe, so she already established the tendancy to do that.

Personally, I don’t think NK spends that much time with Sunday. She always looks a bit awkward carrying her…not comfy like most Mums. I’m sure there are loads of Nannies.

well she was taking her from the car to the doctors office, not out on a all day stroll. in europe she was in the same situation, car to a museum/hotel. she put her inside her coat to protect her from the cameras so im pretty sure nicole fans see things fine thank you very much.

and yes danielle im sorry, i forgot you live in the kidman urban household and know how much time she spends with her baby.

Why can’t this woman carry her baby like a normal person? She doesn’t have a maternal bone in her body! So these pics were taken on Friday, but we don’t them until Sunday. I guess Wendy needed to approve of them. If her acting couldn’t carry her, then her beauty should right? And that’s not the case, her looks were an issue in “Australia”. Also, there was someone up above that said Boxtox doesn’t change your face - who the heck are you kidding? Do you know what Boxtox does to muscle tissue in your face? Sorry, but muscle tissue is basically what forms your face. Kidman needs to retire immediately - if she hangs in any longer, she will become more of a disgrace!

With comments like that about Australia, Kidman shouldn’t work in Hollywood ever again. What producer, director, actor, etc., would want to work with her for fear she’ll turn around and spit in their face once the movie is done.

Taco Bell @ 01/11/2009 at 9:55 pm

Found the posting! HA.

The no. hater of Kidman. What bizarro freaks!

I’m sorry, I just noticed some other things as I looked through the pictures. The nanny went with to the doctor’s visit. Was she the one that updated the doctor on how Sunday is developing? And look at Kidman’s hair. Does she own a bottle of conditioner, and it is very obvious she doesn’t have the hair extensions in on that day!

correction Taco Bell @ 01/11/2009 at 10:07 pm

That is the Urban’s assistant and has been around long before Sunday was born.

Reality Bites FOR YOU!

Idiocy ABounds @ 01/11/2009 at 10:13 pm

Is the taco twit actually bitchhing because Nic let her hair dry naturally and only wears hair extensions to market 130 million dollar corporate products? LMAO

Yes, Tacobrain, it’s called being an actress. You wear costumes and play a part and must market the product to fulfill the contract.

THEN…you go home, wear jeans, no make-up, and wash your real hair and live NORMALLY.

Oh Nichole from what of I can see of Sunday Rose she so adorable..
You also one of the best actresses ever..

Seems like the usual bunch of Urban malcontents who can’t relate to a classy, talented woman who’s found success and happiness. Glad to read the article that cleared up exactly what she said about watching her movie. Obviously many of them did not. Guess they didn’t recognize her personal assistant either or know that Wendy Day isn’t her US rep. Shows how much they really don’t know. Nasty and uninformed. Have to feel sorry for them.

Sarena Taff @ 01/11/2009 at 10:40 pm

Do you people insist on talking bad about others to make yourselves feel better. It’s her baby she can hold her and dress her the way she sees fit. I wish people would just stop nit picking at her life when it’s none of their business.

You know what really cracks me up? The idiots out there, who can’t think of an intelligent answer, start attacking people with rude comments.

The fact of the matter is, that Nicole has been pictured repeatedly showing that she does not dress the baby properly for the weather.

That is not an attack on her looks, or acting skills. It is stating that while she makes sure she is always warm enough, the baby is not. If you can’t see that, then explain why she is always shoving the poor baby inside HER jacket?

Why does everything always have to escalate into rude remarks and telling people they hate Nicole. Are we not able to state an opinion?

Dana, why don’t you think of an original comment once in awhile? You use the same one over and over. Guess it shows that you don’t have a mind of your own.

To Nutcase @ 01/11/2009 at 11:08 pm

Babies are hidden in jackets to void the paps, not for warmth!
LOL

The baby was dressed just fine in every intrusive photo.

Another new name, troll?

You have the nerve to call others trolls? Have you tried looking in the mirror?

You never have the guts to give your actual name, which gives you the guts to say what you want and call names.

I would say you are a coward who gets their kicks out of calling other people names.

Isn’t it funny how you have guts when you are “anonymous” . I bet you are the type who sends vulgar emails to others and then blames it on your family (who you didn’t know was on your computer)
Completely laughable.

I’m no fan of NK’s, but some people are off the deep end. She’ll get slammed for anything and everything. The baby has a hat on this time, so let’s talk about how she’s holding the baby. Waste of energy.

FYI Nutcase @ 01/11/2009 at 11:26 pm

EVERYONE on a blog is anonymous! FOCLMAO

Unless you’re saying your legal name is “Nutcases”?

I realize everyone is “anonymous” to a certain extent. I’m saying this to you who seems to change the name everytime you post so that you can throw insults to people.

You should get a little more class and education so that you don’t come off as such a piece of white trash.

How many tattoos do you have? I would bet quite a few.

JustTheFactsPlease @ 01/11/2009 at 11:46 pm

Tired of nutcases (#56) - Nicole is almost always dressed more warmly than others. Back in May-June of last year when she was pregnant, she was pictured many times in Nashville wearing layers of clothing including denim jacket when everyone else there was sweating in 90+ degree weather.

So I’m not surprised at all why Sunday Rose is wearing less than her mommy. She is appropriately dressed for the weather in Nashville; it’s Nicole who is overdressed in too many layers.

One cannot acquire or as you so eloquently wrote “get some class”.

You just outed your lower middle class affectations!

Still laughing at you.

You require anger management therapy and a LIFE.

Sunday looks dressed just fine to me. She is going from the car to the doctor’s office and will be undressed for her check up, then redressed and put right back into the car. Looks like a poster on here is nitpicking.

pineapplesundae @ 01/12/2009 at 1:10 am

lee, of course they are. The skeptics have come out in full force here. Only now they are smart enough not to use the same screen names as they do on the e! board. Nicole will never be right. They just have to find something in every pic that proves she’s a bad mother. If its not the hat she’s holding her wrong. if its not that she’s holding her wrong its that the baby wants to get away from her. How they can say that when the pics they were commenting on were of Sunday with her eyes and mouth closed is a complete mystery to me. And please people stop pulling crap with Nicole’s clothes. First it was the jacket she was wearing with Keith overseas being a biker jacket just because it had some zippers. Clearly it wasn’t. Now her blazer is a full winter coat? Stop the hate from blinding your common sense…and eyesight!

It really seems like she doesn’t care if her movies do well or not. She never goes the extra mile to promote them like other high paid actresses.

Is she trying to make herself look ugly. The hair, hag clothes, botoxed forehead, etc. She needs bangs.

pineapplesundae @ 01/12/2009 at 1:15 am

eliza, great comments. And the sad thing is these malcontents think they know it all!

wtg? WTF? @ 01/12/2009 at 1:21 am

Kidman flew to over a dozen countries with baby and husband in tow in only a 3 week period and did over 30 interviews on US, AU, and International TV as well as numerous magazine articles.

For the paltry salary she took, 500k? Kidman went all out to promote Australia, as did Jackman.

Very few actresses walk the red carpet at that many premieres and over the holiday season with an infant!

Another negative poster who doesn’t knwo what they’re talking abut at all.

She look perfect!! Love Nicole, Love Sunday…

worriedaboutthatbaby @ 01/12/2009 at 1:31 am

she doesn’t hold her baby very well :(

is this her first time carrying the baby?

I’ve always enjoyed any movie with Nicole, she is a great actress. This is her third child so obviously she knows how to dress a child and care for them. I do wonder though how Tom Cruise got the majority of custody of their 2 kids. Why do they not live with their Mum? Not bashing, I really like Nicole, but don’t most kids in a divorce live with their mother?

Sunday is a beautiful little girl.

very sweet

SO ADORABLE

CUTE! CUTE!CUTE!

nicole seems incredibly beautiful and young! she’s 41 old, she’s not make up, she’s waling in a street and she looks much better and younger than all these twnties stupid and bitchies actresses.

she’s holding sunday very well and she well covered for nashville weather…
she never said she hate herself in australia. us and aus media changed the meaning of her words. she never said nothing like that. for me is a cospiracy
you, stupid kidman haters have no life. you’re loosers..
get a life

Sunday Rose is SOOOOOOOOO cute!

Sunday Rose is a beuaitful little girl.

14# PERFECT! THE WORDS HAD BEEN TAKEN OFF OF THE CONTEXT.

THAT IS LAMENTABLE!

Nis is beautiful and Sunday Rose is so cute, adorable!

tjees take a parenting leson nicole, how to hold my kid! i have never seen a picture where it looks like she is holding that kid naturally. Its always as if she isn’t used to holding kids. O wait. they have a nanny.. eighter she isn’t a natural good mom, or she is never spending time with that kid. both ways concern me for the baby.

Sunday is a little angel !! so beautiful !

I see a lot of the scientologists are at work on the message board… I am not one but I have studied it a bit and those who are constantly harassing Nicole Kidman you are doing more bad done good to your organization… Scientology has a lot of promise much of it makes sense the problem is the people at the top are smarter than the masses in the organization my suggestion is to target the smart people rather the the druggies and uneducated… perhaps then Ron Howard’s dream will be a reality - just some honest advice here…

correction Taco Bell - yea, sure that’s Urban’s assistant . . . whatever . . don’t think so, and why would HIS assistant go with to a check-up for THEIR daughter with Kidman? Did HIS assistant go with them on her flop promotion tour?

Idiocy ABouds - Good for you . . . you just admited that Kidman isn’t as all natural as she claims to be. A woman in her 40’s shouldn’t have to wear extensions. By that age, you should be comfortable in your own skin. Kidman is losing her hair and can’t handle it. She has to keep up with the youthful actresses today . . . she is extremely insecure.

eliza - Kidman is NOT talented. Have you read ALL of the reviews from Oz - not just the good ones posted on NKU? Yes, Wendy is the OZ PR rep, but we like to pick on her, and you are aware that Catherine is no longer with her. I guess she got fed up after having to clean up the paps beating by the trainer and David Garris.

pineapplesundae - you ARE the pot calling the kettle black. Why don’t you share YOUR screen name from the e board?

SUNDAY IS SO CUTE!! @ 01/12/2009 at 7:47 am

NICOLE LOOKS SO BEAUTIFUL AND SUNDAY SO CUTE!!

JustTheFactsPlease @ 01/12/2009 at 8:59 am

taco (#86) - You are clearly mistaken if you think Catherine is no longer with her. She was in all the “Australia” European premieres that Nicole attended. She was at the New York premiere as well. She could be seen in some video clips hovering near Nicole. In one of the news clips showing Nicole’s arrival at the NY premiere, you could clearly see Keith getting out of the limo, then Catherine, and then Nicole.

SUNDAY IS A CUTIE PIE!! @ 01/12/2009 at 9:25 am

Nic Looks So Beautiful And Sunday Rose is just a little Cutie Pie!!

FAct Check @ 01/12/2009 at 9:27 am

That girl is the Urban’s assistant, with a possessive “s”.

ENGLISH, its NOT just a second language, ahem, Taco.

As for holding the baby. I’ve never heard such babble.

Nicole doesn’t carry her baby on her hip like a native, she carries her using the strength in her arms. How is that wrong?

Also, as a woman who is also very tall and with four children I don’t carry my children as high either. I don’t have too, my torso is long enough to not have to throw my baby over my shoulder as their legs legs never impeded my walking.

It’s simple comfort and dynamics.

Sorry, but there was an article that came out a while ago that stated that Catherine is no longer her rep. She’s with the same agency, but doesn’t rep her anymore. Where are these pictures?

Do you really think two A-list celebrities in their fields share one assistant?

“Nicole doesn’t carry her baby on her hip like a native, she carries her using the strength in her arms. How is that wrong?”

Do you really think that feels good on Sunday’s chest & back? You need to support a baby by having it sit on your arm!

I wonder if she squirmed when she had her big man’s hand out for the millions she got for makeing this movie what a fake she is

I was so disappointed reading that Nicole Kidman said such things about her acting in Australia (by the way AUSTRALIA WAS A FANTASTIC, BRILLIANT FILM). She was very good in that and had no reason to speak like this about her work. I absolutely believe that an actor, or director should always defend their work no matter what. Specially Kidman, who was calling Australia her ‘dream movie’, the ‘best thing I’ve ever done’, ‘I am connected to this film so much that I have never been before with any of my movies’. I read such things and so many more hundreds of times in magazines, newspapers, websites, I watched her talking this way about the film on podcasts, interviews etc. She even connected the ‘miracle’ of her daughter’s birth with ‘Austalia’ and now she goes: “It’s just impossible for me to connect to it emotionally at all.” For me she betrayed her effords first as the leading actress of the movie, her director, whom ironically she claims she abores, her co-stars and everyone involved in the project and gave their soul for it. Was she so affected by the critics? Was she so affected that HUGH JACKMAN came out completely unscathed and most of time praised by critics instead of her? But wait a minute. Not ALL reviews were bad!!? I would say that opinions were divided. In metacritic the film’s score was 53 out of 100, in rottentomatoes 52 and according to forums about Australia most people loved it. Plus, it’s crossed 150$ million so far. But even if all these weren’t true, she should still defend Australia, she should defend her work and not defame it. WE are the ones who will judge her acting, I mean the audience, and she should know that a big part of us liked Australia as a whole, and that “whole” definetely included her. The olny thing she achieved with her statements was to become a derision and of course to give the final shot to her career. Pity…

KEITHNNICOLELOVER @ 01/12/2009 at 10:58 am

WOW!!! I can’t believe how cruel people can be . I think the baby and nicole are dressed accordingly ,and I think Nicole Is holding her baby FINE!!! ALSO… KEITH IS A CELEB, AND IS MARRIED TO NICOLE. THEY ARE PERFECT FOR EACH OTHER AND HAPPY WITH THEIR LIFE TOGETHER . I don’t see how anyone could think they have a chance with MR.URBAN. I LOVE HIM TO PIECES AND SUPPORT HIM 100% BUT I DAMN SURE DON’T think I could EVER GET HIM FROM NICOLE NOR WOULD I WANT TO. IM THINKING THE OTHER KEITH URBAN FANS FEEL THE SAME WAY I DO(WELL MOST OF THEM) :).no one is hating on NICOLE.and the way she&Keith raise their daughter, they are doing a great job in my opinion! PEOPLE, GET A LIFE AND STOP HATING !! HAVE A NICE DAY! : )

2ms @ 01/12/2009 at 10:47 am @ 01/12/2009 at 11:30 am

sweetheart y don’t u check facts b4 writing an epistle, u culdn’t be bothered to check, & someone did & pasted it for u, all u had to do was read instead of concentrating on BS posted by JJ

#97 - I really don’t get what you’re trying to say. If you mean that what I wrote is not true, well you are wrong. As a fan of Hugh Jackman and Baz Luhrmann I can say with confidence that I know pretty much everything about Australia and all its backstage story and its stars’ comments on it . I’ve read almost all Australia reviews, good and bad, and people’s comments on imdb, EW, etc. I deal with cinema and I’m not so fool to concentrate on jj posts to get an opinion about a movie. But maybe I just didn’t get what you mean

pineapplesundae @ 01/12/2009 at 12:09 pm

lady, the driving force behind these negative comments is not Scientology, but is really ex-Urban fans who are pissed off to no end that the country singer is with Kidman. Go to the Awful Truth board at the e! channel’s gossip area and you’ll see. Pages and pages of criticism, hate, and vitriol. It’s been going on since they hooked up. All from one group, former Urban fans. Its gotten so nasty they bash him and start horrible rumors about the baby. I’d also like to out the Urban Myths blog on blogspot. These two groups are so obsessed they have a feud with each other, each claiming they’ve got the scoop on Kidman and how awful she is. All this would be funny if it wasn’t so scary how serious they take gossip, rumor and innuendo. Much of it they start themselves.

Shaking head….

“lady, the driving force behind these negative comments is not Scientology, but is really ex-Urban fans who are pissed off to no end that the country singer is with Kidman. Go to the Awful Truth board at the e! channel’s gossip area and you’ll see. Pages and pages of criticism, hate, and vitriol. It’s been going on since they hooked up. All from one group, former Urban fans. Its gotten so nasty they bash him and start horrible rumors about the baby. I’d also like to out the Urban Myths blog on blogspot. These two groups are so obsessed they have a feud with each other, each claiming they’ve got the scoop on Kidman and how awful she is. All this would be funny if it wasn’t so scary how serious they take gossip, rumor and innuendo. Much of it they start themselves.

Shaking head….”

Wow, you tell people to get a life on here, but look at what you do. You search the internet finding any way possible to defend these two, who are two people you will never meet and will never know. But for some strange reason, you honestly believe she is perfect just because you believe everything that comes out of her mouth. Do you know what happens to fans who claim they are BFFs with celebrities in their pretend world? I don’t believe anybody anywhere has said anything horrible about Sunday. She is a beautiful baby with two messed-up parents.

the hate that people have for someone that doesnt have blood hanging fromher neck orbreakup marriages ordoesnt have tatooswas marriedwhen she had a baby and i could go on on about her excellant acting and over all behavior compared to most of HOLLYWOOD.youall have mental problems.

The cutest baby ever !!!!!
SO BEAUTIFUL.

Sunday is absolutely precious!!!

They are wonderful, sweet!

YOU ARE WRONG!! and a bit thick.

Go back and read the comments from the beginning and figure it out

OH My GOD!!! beautiful little baby!

Lifegoesonregardless @ 01/12/2009 at 2:12 pm

Re Keith and Nicole’s publicity problems - Charisma is a double sided sword. Urban oozes it. Beauty is the same and to most people with 20/20 eyesight, Nicole is a beauty. Not everyone’s taste, but why get so insulting about it. So you have here two people who are subject to constant envy and criticism by numerous groups - Keith’s fans, scientology, jealous actresses and newspaper people who are smarting from interviews not given. I feel so sorry that the life she had envisioned in Nashville is falling apart. To paraphrase the Bard: “Kill all the journalists and paps” - (lawyers be darned).

TWPUMPKIN @ 01/12/2009 at 2:22 pm

SHE LOOKS LIKE SHE HAS NEVER HELD A BABY. NOT VERY LOVING. IS IT REALLY HER KID? I WONDER.

#105 - I don’t have to read any comment and I won’t. I’m just a regular visitor here in jj and just expressed my opinion on the site’s specific post and what NK said about her role in her latest movie. I already knew her statements, I read them on Melbourne Herald Sun newspaper and just wanted to say a few words about that and ONLY that. My comment didn’t refer to any other comment posted here in the first place. Don’t see what’s the problem & I do know I’m not wrong -at least about the FACTS I mentioned, not about my opinion on Kidman’s career- but anyway I’m done with all this.

Agree with ms (#95) and daniel (#94). I wonder what Jackman or even worse Luhrmann might think about her now that she goes out and talks that way about a film that really needs some good publicity, not its stars to come out and say: “Oh, I suck in Australia”. Luhrmann already defended soulfully his movie and Jackman always has a good word for it. Their opinion about Kidman’s statements would be a really interesting thing to read.

Australia is a great movie, but it would have been better without her. It was too annoying to see her emotionless face.

If you’ve read some of the early posts, (specifically Post #14 called Quote – IN CONTEXT), there’s a link to what Nicole REALLY said and how some “journalists” took her words out of context to make it look as though she was dissing the movie and her performance in it. Why don’t you take a look?
People like to distort things to make news and cause controversy, and Nicole is an easy target who doesn’t fight back. She keeps a low profile unless she’s doing promotions for her work. Why draw erroneous conclusions from second-hand reports when the original is there to listen to and read?

JustTheFactsPlease @ 01/12/2009 at 7:11 pm

Taco (#92) - “but there was an article that came out a while ago that stated that Catherine is no longer her rep.”

That goes to show where you are getting your information! No such article ever came out. That was pure speculation from a couple of NK sites who never do any fact-checking but are mainly writing their usual pile of trash.

Here’s Catherine with Nicole at the NY premiere:
http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/83811164/Getty-Images-Entertainment?axd=DetailPaging.Generic|1&axs=0|83811411%2c83811403%2c83811387%2c83811366%2c83811344%2c83811339%2c83811283%2c83811281%2c83811267%2c83811263%2c83811258%2c83811253%2c83811248%2c83811242%2c83811234%2c83811222%2c83811221%2c83811212%2c83811206%2c83811164%2c83811157%2c83811156%2c83811147%2c83811145%2c83811144%2c83811143%2c83811127%2c83811126%2c83811119%2c83811106%2c83811105%2c83811103%2c83811094%2c83811093%2c83811080%2c83811073%2c83811070%2c83811069%2c83811061%2c83810953%2c83810939%2c83810879%2c83810868%2c83810865%2c83810861%2c83810857%2c83810850%2c83810842%2c83810832%2c83810825%2c83810822%2c83810814%2c83810802%2c83810773%2c83810770%2c83810766%2c83810764%2c83810663%2c83810639%2c83810606|240

At the London premiere:
http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/83986198/Getty-Images-Entertainment?axd=DetailPaging.Generic|1&axs=0|83988298%2c83988294%2c83988289%2c83988279%2c83988244%2c83988224%2c83988222%2c83988218%2c83988211%2c83986446%2c83986383%2c83986354%2c83986349%2c83986314%2c83986311%2c83986292%2c83986265%2c83986240%2c83986227%2c83986198%2c83986177%2c83986176%2c83986171%2c83986158%2c83986140%2c83986136%2c83986129%2c83986126%2c83986117%2c83986043%2c83986003%2c83985678%2c83985574%2c83985553%2c83985443%2c83985442%2c83985438%2c83985434%2c83985432%2c83985431%2c83985423%2c83985420%2c83985417%2c83985414%2c83985412%2c83985369%2c83985351%2c83985348%2c83985346%2c83985342%2c83985340%2c83985338%2c83985333%2c83985331%2c83985326%2c83985208%2c83985171%2c83984894%2c83984891%2c83984890|60

That will give you an idea of what Catherine Olim looks like, as it seems like you don’t even have an idea. You can look up other pictures at the Getty Images site.

btw … I once knew a “taco” person (totally asinine, crude, offensive).

JustTheFactsPlease @ 01/12/2009 at 7:16 pm

Correction to my above post #113:

Taco (#92) - “but there was an article that came out a while ago that stated that Catherine is no longer her rep.”

That goes to show where you are getting your information! No such article ever came out. That was pure speculation from a couple of NK HATE sites who never do any fact-checking but are mainly writing their usual pile of trash.

Guys, I don’t know if you know that, but Nicole usually does not watch her own movies. I mean, she’s clearly a shy person and the only reason she has watched Moulin Rouge and Australia was Baz Luhrmann, very close friend of her. So, I think before saying it was rude what she said maybe you could get some information and, then, show your opinion.

And OMG! What a gorgeous baby!! Sunday Rose is sooooooo cute, and look how big she is *-* I just love them, and Nic seems the happiest person around her little baby.

You can laugh all you want, but we both know who the trailer trash is.

Trailer trash doesn’t know how to spell and since they can’t think of anything original or intelligent to say, they try to make fun of others.

BTW how big is your tattoo?

ameibush9799 @ 01/13/2009 at 1:28 am

nicole looks so good.
Sunday is so cute

ok, I got my lesson and I apologise for what I said about Nic. Sorry for being so stubborn… There were soooo many manipulative articles about that radio interview and I hadn’t listen to the real recording till now. It’s unbelievable how misleading the media (and people like me who sometimes don’t bother to search a bit further) can be and how much this can affect the reputation of a person. Again I’m sorry…

Now it’s my turn to tell everyone GO TO POST #14 AND THEN WRITE YOUR OPINION ON THIS POST!!!!!!!!!!!

newlife = Brentwood Babe, Brentwood Barbie, Concertgoers.

Good for you MS #119. It takes a big person to admit she’s made a mistake.

butseriously @ 01/16/2009 at 11:32 am

Anyone that really loves KEITH and is a true fan of his (like myself) would not make ignorant remarks about Nicole. He loves her dearly, therefore to bash her is to bash Keith. Stop it folks. Get a life beyond the one you have that consists of trashing other people to make yourself seem like you are important. You know who you are.

Some of the mom’s commenting on this issue know how tough it is to keep a squirming 4 month old wrapped in a blankie. You wrap the little darlings and they’re kicking, squirming and unwrapped in seconds, or so it seems. Having worked for many years in the field of pediatrics, it’s actually not has healthy as you’d think to keep children too bundled up.
One more soapbox point, and I’ll stifle myself. Good on Nicole for keeping up with pediatric well check ups and [an assumption] immunizations!

zzzzzzzzzzz @ 01/26/2009 at 1:35 pm

i believe that it is one from the better actors of our season.i agree by no means with those that believe that her films are ugly!!!she’s splendid!!!!

Love Nic!!!
She is beautiful. So much big deal about Nicole’s botox. She is not the only one. Even good ol’ Simon Cowell uses it and so do a lot, a lot of other actors, men and women!!!!

what’s with all the Nicole haters? if you don’t like her why the hell are you looking at her pics and commenting about her?

Nicole’s comments were taken out of context and twisted around. She just feels uncomfortable seeing herself on the big screen. I saw an interview recently with Heath Ledger where he said the same thing, except he said he wants to throw up when he sees himself on the big screen!

Comment and Share!








You have of 5,000 characters left.