Nicole Kidman: Sunday Rose Check-Up!

CUTE! CUTE!CUTE!

Sunday Rose is SOOOOOOOOO cute!

14# PERFECT! THE WORDS HAD BEEN TAKEN OFF OF THE CONTEXT.

THAT IS LAMENTABLE!

tjees take a parenting leson nicole, how to hold my kid! i have never seen a picture where it looks like she is holding that kid naturally. Its always as if she isn’t used to holding kids. O wait. they have a nanny.. eighter she isn’t a natural good mom, or she is never spending time with that kid. both ways concern me for the baby.

I see a lot of the scientologists are at work on the message board… I am not one but I have studied it a bit and those who are constantly harassing Nicole Kidman you are doing more bad done good to your organization… Scientology has a lot of promise much of it makes sense the problem is the people at the top are smarter than the masses in the organization my suggestion is to target the smart people rather the the druggies and uneducated… perhaps then Ron Howard’s dream will be a reality - just some honest advice here…

pineapplesundae - you ARE the pot calling the kettle black. Why don’t you share YOUR screen name from the e board?

taco (#86) - You are clearly mistaken if you think Catherine is no longer with her. She was in all the “Australia” European premieres that Nicole attended. She was at the New York premiere as well. She could be seen in some video clips hovering near Nicole. In one of the news clips showing Nicole’s arrival at the NY premiere, you could clearly see Keith getting out of the limo, then Catherine, and then Nicole.

That girl is the Urban’s assistant, with a possessive “s”.

ENGLISH, its NOT just a second language, ahem, Taco.

As for holding the baby. I’ve never heard such babble.

Nicole doesn’t carry her baby on her hip like a native, she carries her using the strength in her arms. How is that wrong?

Also, as a woman who is also very tall and with four children I don’t carry my children as high either. I don’t have too, my torso is long enough to not have to throw my baby over my shoulder as their legs legs never impeded my walking.

It’s simple comfort and dynamics.

Do you really think two A-list celebrities in their fields share one assistant?

“Nicole doesn’t carry her baby on her hip like a native, she carries her using the strength in her arms. How is that wrong?”

Do you really think that feels good on Sunday’s chest & back? You need to support a baby by having it sit on your arm!

I was so disappointed reading that Nicole Kidman said such things about her acting in Australia (by the way AUSTRALIA WAS A FANTASTIC, BRILLIANT FILM). She was very good in that and had no reason to speak like this about her work. I absolutely believe that an actor, or director should always defend their work no matter what. Specially Kidman, who was calling Australia her ‘dream movie’, the ‘best thing I’ve ever done’, ‘I am connected to this film so much that I have never been before with any of my movies’. I read such things and so many more hundreds of times in magazines, newspapers, websites, I watched her talking this way about the film on podcasts, interviews etc. She even connected the ‘miracle’ of her daughter’s birth with ‘Austalia’ and now she goes: “It’s just impossible for me to connect to it emotionally at all.” For me she betrayed her effords first as the leading actress of the movie, her director, whom ironically she claims she abores, her co-stars and everyone involved in the project and gave their soul for it. Was she so affected by the critics? Was she so affected that HUGH JACKMAN came out completely unscathed and most of time praised by critics instead of her? But wait a minute. Not ALL reviews were bad!!? I would say that opinions were divided. In metacritic the film’s score was 53 out of 100, in rottentomatoes 52 and according to forums about Australia most people loved it. Plus, it’s crossed 150$ million so far. But even if all these weren’t true, she should still defend Australia, she should defend her work and not defame it. WE are the ones who will judge her acting, I mean the audience, and she should know that a big part of us liked Australia as a whole, and that “whole” definetely included her. The olny thing she achieved with her statements was to become a derision and of course to give the final shot to her career. Pity…

sweetheart y don’t u check facts b4 writing an epistle, u culdn’t be bothered to check, & someone did & pasted it for u, all u had to do was read instead of concentrating on BS posted by JJ

lady, the driving force behind these negative comments is not Scientology, but is really ex-Urban fans who are pissed off to no end that the country singer is with Kidman. Go to the Awful Truth board at the e! channel’s gossip area and you’ll see. Pages and pages of criticism, hate, and vitriol. It’s been going on since they hooked up. All from one group, former Urban fans. Its gotten so nasty they bash him and start horrible rumors about the baby. I’d also like to out the Urban Myths blog on blogspot. These two groups are so obsessed they have a feud with each other, each claiming they’ve got the scoop on Kidman and how awful she is. All this would be funny if it wasn’t so scary how serious they take gossip, rumor and innuendo. Much of it they start themselves.

Shaking head….