OlderGwyneth Paltrow Bares Her Gorgeous Gams
Gwyneth Paltrow bares her long legs in Burberry’s classic double-breasted trench while on her way to Claridges Hotel in London for a press conference on Friday (March 13).
The 36-year-old actress has been spending time in the city with her children Apple, 4, and Moses, 2, but revealed in yesterday’s GOOP that she “can’t wait to start Iron Man 2 in two weeks and hang out with [director Jon Favreau] every day.”
Talking to OK, the 37-year-old actress expressed her thoughts on being both an actress and mother.
On being a mother: “Motherhood has changed me in every way. It changed everything from my DNA on up. My perspective is so much different and the way I spend my day is different.”
On balacinging motherhood and work: “It is also nice to acknowledge that I am a woman, I’m an artist, I work and it’s part of who I am.”
Share This Post:
62 Comments
I just can’t see any appeal to her whatsoever - she looks awful
Anorexic.lemon.face.
she was cute when she was younger but she looks like **** nowadays
I don’t think Gwyneth is beautiful . I think she is an overrated horse face but I do love her classy mom and I will go see Iron Man II.
Surprisingly, less makeup actually makes her look older. Usually it’s the opposite.
She looks to have dipped into the fake tanning, which makes fair skinned people (like me) look more orange than tan. She should keep it natural. And I agree with the comments that she looks much better with lots of makeup—it is usually the opposite, but not for her.
she is ugly
Poor thing thinks she can pull off the natural makeup look but she is just not pretty enough, instead she looks old and haggard.
Nice legs! She is pretty hot in Two Lovers: http://www.actressscene.com/2009/02/gwyneth-paltrow-in-two-lovers.html
She’s aging graciously.
http://www.IGotConverse.com
blah, blah, bLAH. She forgot to mention she’s also a fuc-king idiot!
She looks like hell, eat a cracker for heavens sake.
Overrated, pompous, smug, unattractive, …
how come you never see her and chris martin together?
She looks like a ghost. A smug, entitled ghost.
luv her hair but thats about it…
Reese Witherspoon has much better legs.
She doesnt look ugly. She looks normal….good hair…no make up…there is nothing bad about her.
i opposite-of .’heart’ her.
She looks really thin and old with that weird diet of hers. Maybe a sandwich or ten will make her look better.
Gwyn’s not ugly; she’s just very plain looking in those photos and she looks like she’s lost a lot of weight in her face…
…and she’s wearing makeup in the close-ups (blush, lipstick, mascara) but the lipstick is unflattering and wrong for the dress color.
GWYNETH is a beauty, a brain and an incredible talent. She’s a force for the future. I love her, I enjoy GOOP and wish her well always. Plus she’s married to a bonafide rockgod but keeps her life private. Brilliant. oh, and she cooks, eats lots and speak other languages. Gwynnie, if you’re reading - know that smart girls everywhere adore you. In your own (awesome) words - F#*K THE HATERS!
She looks horrible. Her face looks about 40 years old. Why is she lighting her hair.
#48 must be a paid poster lol. No body adore this stupid buffoon!
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!