Rachel Bilson: InStyle’s New Fashion Editor!

@lily don’t know much about chloe other than she worked on shattered Glass, same as a few other people.
Do agree with others “Intouch” is not cannon fodder it’s a respected Mag

@#88 - atlqueen
Think your question I had answered in a post above? And would you please stop giving names to everybody who doesn’t like RB and/or HC? Thank you. This takes out every seriousness of one of your posts, you know?

@#98 - Gasol_fan16
The most pretty one on this pic is the dog for sure, at least in my eyes.

@#100 - lily
Chloe Sevigny became famous with a very hard to watch movie called “Kids” from a provoking director about the subject HIV. Remember I extra had to go see it in Switzerland back then as over here they did not even show it at theaters. Now they sometimes bring it very late at night on TV. It leaves you depressed but thinking - I would suggest it to all pupils of a certain age, as a warning.

Smilehexe, thanks for the info. Was CS any good in that movie or was the talk simply because of the controversial content? I’m curious now.

trevise, there’s nothing wrong with not liking. Trust me, on teetering on the edge right now. Everybody has a right to their opinion and I fully respect that.

I actually love reading the banter that’s been going back and forth, it’s quite entertaining.

@#106 - lily
I have seen this movie many years ago but what I remember she was good in it, and it also brought her some acclaim from the critics. It’s not a movie I personally would watch twice but still worth being seen once IMO.
Chloe Sevigny does not have this “obvious beauty jumping in your face” to me but she has something you remember, she’s individual which is not a bad thing in times of plastic surgeons all over the HW-business. I admire people, especially women, who stay themselves in all of this, like e.g. also Sarah Michelle Gellar-Prinze for keeping her real nose etc. Look at Jessica Simpson or Kate Bosworth for example, I think it’s hard to not mix them up, and there are more like this, all seem modeled after one same type. And especially if somebody gets older, some “make-overs” (done in an operating room) start to turn against them very often. Have three actresses in mind here but don’t want to name them. ;-) Just think about women with no possibility anymore to move their faces anyhow natural. Takes a lot out of their performances.

By far i think this article said it best and by the way see who their source was
http://www.theinsider.com/news/2067889_Rachel_Bilson_is_new_InStyle_fashion_editor

Where is the “eff-me”-sign on her forehead?!
http://www.theinsider.com/photos/2078100_Rachel_Bilson_becomes_a_fashion_editor
Hey Rach! How about the p0rñ industry? Ever thought about that? LOL

That is not me–I don’t post in capitals-try again fake or have the guts to post under a real names-I’d actually respect you more for it.–yawn you are boring

@ sharon 110

This is the diclaimer for the Insider post you gave a link to. Just another poster with an opinion like here.

“DISCLAIMER: This posting was submitted by a user of the site not from The Insider editorial staff. All users have acknowledged and agreed that the submission of their story and its contents is in compliance with our Terms of Use.”

To Lexie and Sharon, or anyone else who cares in regards to the Edie Rose line: HIlary Duff said on a morning tv talk show that she has a fashion line coming out with DKNY for the “fall 2009 and holiday season”. It is a limited edition. Rachel’s Edie Rose line was similar for the fall and holiday season of 2008. It sold out quickly online and was not ” pulled” because it has a dress in it similar to another designer’s dress. Fashion houses are very aware of the designs they put out and legality, there are many “knock off” dresses/outfits with slight differences made from famous designers to sell to the average person at prices they can afford. An example are the gowns similar to the ones stars wear to red carpet events that are created that can be bought at lower prices, these are seen on tv from time to time. Rachel’s line was a success because it sold out quickly oniine. Unless DKNY makes more, since it was a limited edition, there probaby won’t be anymore of this line. Watch Hillary Duff’s line this fall, I bet something similar will happen. She is popular, it will probably sell out quickly as well. Look online if you want more “proof”.

I must say RB’s (pr) agent/publicist does an “audacious” job of packaging up an empty canister and placing her like the bubbling champagne. It’s great to be able to understand someone when you peel off the layers of icing placed upon her by her agents & publicist. It’s finally great that the people are exposing the truth about this woman who seems to lack substance and tried to pass herself off beyond her true ability.
What the moral of the story? Don’t try to oversell yourself. People expect more from you but you can’t produce, do the job well, or carry off another fluff. People will begin to understand and see the truth and that’s where it hurts. So stop trying to be relevant at any cost, nobody respects that kind of fame!

Here is Rachel without the thick eyeliner and expensive clothes:

http://desiringhayden.net/images/displayimage.php?album=lastup&cat=0&pos=0

I have to admit, he looks good, she is a midget witch.

@ 117 - not a good actress but cute as hell

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ… anyhow, physical attributes eventually “fades & get rotten”. What’s inside of a person “lingers & tend to last”.