Brad Pitt’s Sons See Star Trek

# 90 errr @ 05/19/2009 at 11:22 am
.
Now, Ass…don’t take it personally, hon! You know I’ve explained to you before that all of you trolls are the same to me - no matter what name you go by. Assley/DJ/Tres Jolie/Bet/Shitzy…it’s all the same. You’re losers and you’re all stupid so why bother differentiating between you.

hey nice pictures.

Brad is already in there (the Riviera) he’s just not in Cannes. He’ll be at the pavillion on Wednesday.

BIGJPFAN @ 05/19/2009 at 11:25 am
.
>>>>>>
.
I have no doubt for a long time now that Huvane is marketing and pimping Fillerface hard. it’s his job. Both of them decided quite cynically to make F the victim, and churn out stories of f as a victim, regardless of who they hurt.
.
That’s why I have NO qualms laughing at F. And after Modelboy and Peeboy?? I’m pretty sure her men are all PR jobs too.
.
The sad thing is, her hens think just like her. They try and match up her to a brad equivalent. They are always looking for a big star or celebrity. I’ve never read a single f hen who says, f should first look for someone she shares a deep connection with. I had great hopes for Peeboy, - fame hos that they both are. But alas, it seems the contract expired and Peeboy didn’t want to renew.

# 98 His way @ 05/19/2009 at 11:32 am
.
@Passing Through:
Why would she choose these types of movies then?
.
+++++++++++++++++
.
You mean X? She deliberately chooses movies that reflect what the tabloid media is saying about her to keep public sympathy on her side. X literally had no offers for almost 2 years after she made The Break Up. If she’d had any, you know homegirl would have done those movies in flash. But…she finally starts getting scripts again and the first movie she decides to do is based on a book called “He’s Just Not That Into You?” Bear in mind that at that point X had been through VV and PMBP and God knows how many others that were nobodies she had for fcuk buddies. So…you’re X…Huvane gives you the script for HJNITY…aren’t you going to be offended and say, “No way am I doing a movie with that title when everybody already thinks I can’t keep a man! What else have you got? I don’t care if it’s playing 3rd fiddle to 22 dogs…anything but another reminder that I’m single and Brad’s moved on and has 3 kids now!” THAT would what most people would say and they wouldn’t do the movie. X? She gives interviews about empowering women and then turns around and does a movie that makes her look weak and pathetic. Not just because of the title, but because her character dumps her long-time boyfriend because he woulnd’t marry her. How could that NOT be deliberate? .
And then there’s The Baster. X has spent 13 years claiming “I did, I do and I will” and everyone knows she supposedly longing for a baby and irked that Brad went off and became and instant father and then a bio father within a year and a half of their separation. Soooo…she’s now into producing movies…she vets her own projects. She can actively seek out any type of movie she wants to do and be diverse. In the meantime the clock is ticking and she hits a huge age for all women wanting a family - the big 40. The biological clock is ticking and the eggs are disappearing. It’s all over the media and has been for months. So what does she choose as her next project? A movie about a single 40 year-old who’s ticking biological clock pushes her to used iVF to become a mother.
.
A coincidence? Not. Fcuking. Likely. That ****’s deliberate and coldy calculated and manipulative. It’s got instant PR built in. With TBU it was her real-life divorce. With HJNTIY it was her real-life inability to keep a man. With The Baster it will be that she’s - by the time the movie comes out - 41 and has lost another child-bearing year. Meanwhile, she’s on mag covers all the time, gets invited to the Oscars simply because Brad and Angie are nommed and the producers want to use a possible meeting to hype the show. People are blogging about her - even if it’s making fun of her. When a movie like misManagement tanks - notice how it didn’t have any tie-ins to anything related to Brad & Angie? She’s left to peddle that movie on her own name. But with The Baster, it will be right back to “Poor Jen. She’d have children by now if that homewrecking Jolie hadn’t stolen her husband!” That’s win-win for X. The movie gets free publicity, possibly a wider release and SHE gets attention and the whole triangle shite is back on. Btich does more calculus than Einstein ever did.

Jolie was in Neitherlands

hey this is fun for fans. why are so many people who are not fans getting thair panties all in a twist?

Hmmmm sounds like she is in Europe to me!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090519/ap_en_ot/eu_international_court_jolie

Angelina Jolie watches child soldiers trial

.
30 mins ago
THE HAGUE, Netherlands – Movie star and activist Angelina Jolie has attended the International Criminal Court trial of a Congolese warlord charged with using child soldiers.

Jolie said in a statement released by the court Tuesday the case against Thomas Lubanga is a “landmark trial for children” and paid tribute to the former child soldiers who travel to the court’s seat in The Hague to testify.

Lubanga, founder and former leader of the Union of Congolese Patriots political movement and its armed wing, has pleaded innocent to charges of recruiting and using child soldiers in tribal conflicts in 2002-2003.

His is the first international trial to focus solely on child soldiers.

The United Nations estimates up to 250,000 child soldiers still fight in more than a dozen countries.
++++++++++++++++++

You mean she didn’t tell the trolls she was going! What was she thinkin’ !

Angelina Jolie watches child soldiers trial
.
42 minutes ago
.
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Movie star and activist Angelina Jolie has attended the International Criminal Court trial of a Congolese warlord charged with using child soldiers.
.
Jolie said in a statement released by the court Tuesday the case against Thomas Lubanga is a “landmark trial for children” and paid tribute to the former child soldiers who travel to the court’s seat in The Hague to testify.
.
Lubanga, founder and former leader of the Union of Congolese Patriots political movement and its armed wing, has pleaded innocent to charges of recruiting and using child soldiers in tribal conflicts in 2002-2003.
.
His is the first international trial to focus solely on child soldiers.
.
The United Nations estimates up to 250,000 child soldiers still fight in more than a dozen countries.

mmhmmm, right lumberjack. Pot meet kettle. You outed yourself as Articmonkey on the daily news site. rotflmao! all the other comments kept it simple with “she’s not even a good actress,” or, “why do the studios even care”… scroll down to read the lumberjacks LONG ASS POST and try to stop yourself from laughing. The lumber jack puts a lot of time and thought into maniston. who gives a funk about her that much?

Love Jolie she is the best @ 05/19/2009 at 12:40 pm Angelina Jolie watches child soldiers trial
.
42 minutes ago
.
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Movie star and activist Angelina Jolie has attended the International Criminal Court trial of a Congolese warlord charged with using child soldiers.
.
Jolie said in a statement released by the court Tuesday the case against Thomas Lubanga is a “landmark trial for children” and paid tribute to the former child soldiers who travel to the court’s seat in The Hague to testify.
.
Lubanga, founder and former leader of the Union of Congolese Patriots political movement and its armed wing, has pleaded innocent to charges of recruiting and using child soldiers in tribal conflicts in 2002-2003.
.
His is the first international trial to focus solely on child soldiers.
.
The United Nations estimates up to 250,000 child soldiers still fight in more than a dozen countries.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Of course this is not as important as “X’s hairstyle” or “X flip flop cute”.

:roll:

Does anyone besides me see a mix up in priorities?

@Love Jolie she is the best: LoL @ everybody thinking she was in New York filming. NOBODY knows what the hell she’s doing. :lol:

Hope this clears up any concern…not just ‘hating the Jolie-Pitts’ - but a child that was in a sheltered orphanage 2-3 years ago may be a little stunned to see a PG 13 movie especially at such a young age.
I have not seen the movie or clips, but you’d expect a 5 year old to be still watching disney type movies….at least my boys were.
I have no idea what these boys are used to watching and I’m not suggesting Brad or Angelina would force or subject the kids to scary situations - it just seemed an odd choice based on my experience with other parents and my own children.

Parents Strongly Cautioned. Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13.
A PG-13 rating is a sterner warning by the Rating Board to parents to determine whether their children under age 13 should view the motion picture, as some material might not be suited for them. A PG-13 motion picture may go beyond the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult activities or other elements, but does not reach the restricted R category. The theme of the motion picture by itself will not result in a rating greater than PG-13, although depictions of activities related to a mature theme may result in a restricted rating for the motion picture. Any drug use will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. More than brief nudity will require at least a PG-13 rating, but such nudity in a PG-13 rated motion picture generally will not be sexually oriented. There may be depictions of violence in a PG-13 movie, but generally not both realistic and extreme or persistent violence. A motion picture’s single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, initially requires at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive requires an R rating, as must even one of those words used in a sexual context. The Rating Board nevertheless may rate such a motion picture PG-13 if, based on a special vote by a two-thirds majority, the Raters feel that most American parents would believe that a PG-13 rating is appropriate because of the context or manner in which the words are used or because the use of those words in the motion picture is inconspicuous.