OlderWed, 20 May 2009 at 11:58 am
Carrie Prejean’s Mother Is Gay?
Miss California USA Carrie Prejean has become the reverse poster child for gay activism, but Star is reporting that own mother, Francine Coppola, was entangled in a steamy lesbian love affair.
Carrie’s mom’s ex-girlfriend, openly gay sales rep Valerie Vetrano, admits, “Yes, Francine and I dated.”
But the affair was doomed. “Francine explained how she was a Christian and that her loved ones would never accept her if she were gay,” a pal says. “Valerie feels that if Francine had just been open about her sexuality with her family, Carrie would have a better understanding of what gay people have to go through. They just want equal rights.”
Share This Post:
115 Comments
haha loving all these comments!
I don’t understand how she could be Miss California. She’s not even pretty. Just look at that horsey smile. Hideous.
my mom is gay annnddd black and look at me
WOW
Equal rights should be granted to ALL Americans. Unfortunately, Perez Hilton’s name calling and low scores hurt EQUAL RIGHTS and has helped Carrie more than if he had behaved like a judge that believed in equality. Perez has hurt gay rights.
@the truth and britney spear’s marriages aren’t a mockery to the traditional marriages!? i guess i missed the memo. oh, and how many marriages end in divorce?
I think it is time to put this story to rest. Just leave this woman and her family alone. She clearly is not alone with her opinion about the gay marriage issue in California or throughout the US. Both sides can argue until they turn blue, no one will convince anyone’s opinion. Let it go already.
@WentsWorthit:
lol. You rock.
@you’re an Idiot:
Your name really suits your post. What rights do you have to say that some people who are not like you have no right. Gay people are not criminals. Why don’t you take your homophobic attitude and shove them up in your body where the sun don’t shine. And by the why according to my Psych proffesor those who hates the gay people most are envious because they themselves has inner gay themselves. Your beauty queen just proved that.
scientific sense you say?
@alex:
Horsey is right. In fact, I think they put peanut butter around her gums to make it seem like she was really talking.
@HAHA:
Did Britney ever get married in a church? A lot of people say that people that weren’t married in a church aren’t really married. They should fall under the domestic partner heading too.
What “civil rights” do gays Not have. They have the same rights that I do. Being perverted in not a right. Maybe you want an amendment, the right to be perverted and other people must accept and respect your pervertness.
If you think Miss California is ugly, you must be gay. Gay Barry and Michelle, the beast are probably more “gorgeous” to you. Or maybe Rosie, is your beauty icon.
@just saying:
You don’t make any sense, just a disconnected ramble of hate and judgement.
In a word…You are the religious rights equivilent to Perez Hilton.
@ just saying
Prejean is not beautiful - she is as fake as they come! Have you not seen her implants? And I’m betting the hair colour is fake too! If you’re so worried about perversion, how bout you get on Miss Prejean for ‘peverting’ the body that the good Lord gave her.
Also, you are clearly delusional because if gays had the same civil rights as you, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO GET MARRIED. Sorry, thought I’d spell it our for you loud and clear since you obviously don’t grasp the concept of civil rights that other people have tried to outline for you!
you CAN get married, you just can’t marry a person of the same sex, you can’t marry multiple people, you can’t marry your sister or brother, you can’t marry your mom or dad, you can’t marry your dog or your horse. Get the idea? Do I have to spell it out for YOU
as for Carrie, she is a beauty pagent winner (runner up) I personally hate beauty pagents, but your hero Perez, had to push the gay agenda, now you gotta deal with it. Deal with it!
@sheila:
Sheila
There’s no ’science’ to marriage. Now there’s a science to conception.
Marriages vary from time to time, culture to culture. Why there are even Biblical characters said to have 700 wives and 300 concubines!
@Jamman:
Jamman
The USA claims to be a democracy in the tradition and precedence of ancient Greece and Rome. Therefore so-called ‘homosexual marriage’ has a precedence but of course your inferior school system which is based on Judeo-Christianity’s concept of sexuality never explained to you why these cities had duo male rulers such as the 2 kings of Sparta and 2 Consuls of Rome.
You were never told as to the fact of every Greek you ever studied had a male lover even legal partner which in many if not most cases was his ‘true love’ and a female wife for procreation.
The early Roman model was based on the Greek until they began to grow towards what would become an empire. They kept the biarchy in form but discouraged male unions for the obvious reasons of the rational needs of an expanding empire. It was pragmatic not religious as to the Romans but democracy and all the gifts from Greece America loves to boast of were created by bisexual or homosexual men.
Its the height of ignorance and hypocrisy that West Point and the War College regards Alexander the Great as the greatest military commander ever and continue to study his tactics but he wouldn’t be able to serve in the US Army today. Yes, he was bisexual and his beloved was Hephaestion.
Jamman and other Homophobes
You are likely to have seen “300″ but you are content with the explanation of why Sparta had 2 kings. That one led the army at war when the other stayed home. Well what does that sound like? A married couple does not go to war. My father went to war and my mother stayed home to run the house hold.
The Spartans were the very best of the Greek Hoplites so no one can accuse them of being sissies according to the way they are taught to us in schools like Harvard. Right? So what about Thebes? The Thebans eventually defeated the famed and feared Spartan army and the elite of their army were the Sacred Band which consisted of 150 married male couples.
150 couples = 300 men. Does that number sound familiar? All Greek citizens, certainly those whose names and bios are taught were bisexuals involved with a male and female. There’s the legal precedent. Democracy and Oligarchy based on the Greek model were the inventions of Pagan Greek Homosexuals not Judeo-Christian Asexuals.
We are sexual beings. How can anyone have a problem with adults who engage in consential sex? All those who are always telling somebody who they can or cannot have sex with or love are the real problems. If the USA were tribal then OK, but this is a democracy based on the rights of the individual citizen. Women are now adults with the passing of the 19th Amendment giving them the right to vote but why have laws preventing men from having sex if it consential?
Finally, Christians have no right or theological basis to determine who can or who cannot marry or have sex. Why? Because Christianity is hostile to sex, marriage and family?
The Vatican especially has no right to determine human sexuality since they are celibate. The Pope allegedly never has had sex so his opinion on the subject of sex and marriage cannot have any real merit.
Paul was never married and there’s no mention of Jesus Christ ever being married in the Bible that is recognize by the established churches which print it. If sex and marriage were so important than Jesus and Paul would have been married. Roman Catholic priests would not be celibate. And being Protestant only means that some men like Henry VIII and Martin Luther wanted to have sex or marry who they wanted. Sound familiar?
Jammin.
what you FAIL to mention is the fact that when the culture you described became the norm it was the end of Greek and Roman Empires. When genders become blurred, men no longer manly they are usually invaded by a conquering military. Gays make a country weak. When men no longer fight and die for their women, it is the end of their society as they know it.
your little system doesn’t say a lot for women, basically livestock to be breed.
the USA is NOT a democracy, it is a representative republic
@just saying:
Gays cannot marry the person they love, as heterosexuals can. That’s the simple difference. Others include legal rights granted to married couples. With civil ceremonies, we must spend untold monies to get wills drawn up, The rights of both parents to keep a child through adoption, etc. are not assumed when we bear children, the parent who has the child is assumed to be the only parent until adoption and this may be necessary due to death of the birth mother in the relationship.
What is equal about that?
@just saying:
Since I can get married, just not to someone I love….Why don’t you introduce me to one of your relatives, maybe a sister or your daughter and I will try to change..yeah that’s it,,, this is gonna be a snap, and I’ll be so much happier…. I’ll just change my “choice,” and I’ll marry “just sayings” daughter and we will live happily ever after….I think I can, I think I can, I think I can….
My sisters wouldn’t be interested in you and my foster son is a Trigg, so doubt you’d want to marry him. Marriage and kids are expensive, welcome to the real world. Straight couples have to get lawyers as well, so thats not unique to gays. Hospitals don’t always allow straight people in the rooms with patients, so that doesn’t fly very high. Straight couples go to the courthouse and get married all the time, so that really doesn’t fly. Most gays don’t seem to like God very much anyway, so that really doesn’t fly very high. If your in love who needs a contract to love, not me and not you, so that doesn’t fly very high.
What most gays want is MORE rights, NOT equal rights!
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!