OlderMiranda Kerr Covers Rolling Stone
Aussie supermodel Miranda Kerr appears nude and chained to a tree for the latest Australia cover of Rolling Stone’s Green Issue.
The 26-year-old girlfriend of Orlando Bloom wants to shine a light on the Koala Foundation’s “No Tree, No Me” campaign.
“It’s a sad thing. There are only about 100,000 koalas left in Australia,” she tells the mag. “Something like 80 percent of the koalas’ habitat has been destroyed since Europeans arrived in Australia.”
As for making the cover of RS, Miranda says, “Oh it’s incredible. It’s really surreal to be on the cover. Rolling Stone is such an iconic magazine. You know that song, (sings) ‘On the cover of the Rolling Stone’ – that’s just so cool and I’m really happy to be involved in this!”
Bigger cover pics inside…
Share This Post:
84 Comments
If she’s a natural beauty, they wouldn’t have photoshopped her to the extreme. Photoshopping the breast area is quite ok cause that’s normal for models especially for VS models, but the face to be altered extremely is another story.
She’s blaming the Europeans for the depletion of koalas, but yet again she’s dating a European. What a stupid beyatch!
Maybe she didn’t realize that Orlando is a European? Maybe she thought only that he was “Orlando Bloom” famous heart throb so everyone would be so jealous of her. That’s what all the shippers seem to think that we are all so “jealous” of her. I’d rather be one of the koalas.
LIAR LIAR
I’m laughing off my a** cause this girl is a try hard knock out! Since when did she become all these eco thingy *****? Since dating OB lol
Only 100,000??? Seems like quite alot
She looks amazing!
Love her!
poor, sad haters
nothing better to do with their lives than to scour the internet for news on Miranda
poor, poor haters
This was on ONTD, you know, a site where people have actual names, and the majority of posts were favorable. But here, the same pathetic hater can post over and over again, pretending to be different people.
Ignorant people.
She’s right. Europeans caused the destruction of the natural habitats of many animals when they arrived in Australia, AND the Americas.
The native peoples lived in harmony with nature, Europeans destroyed it to suit their needs. I’m know that some things HAD to be destroyed in the fight for civilization, but saying that habitat was destroyed after they came is accurate.
As for the idiot sayingt hat she shouldn’t be saying that because she is dating a European, well stupid, SHE is of European heritage, too. Most of the ancestors of non-native Australians came from Europe. Specifically Great Britain…..you know…where Orlando is from.
Please read your world history books before commenting again.
Please note I searched for posts of Orlando not Miranda! And if she is a supermodel than I am the Queen of England.
did she know that Orlando is European….?????
O_o
But why did you stop to post?
Why is she that important to you?
Orlando “fans” the Delphi loons ignore threads only about him but are parked here 37 comments what the hell obsessed much?
It’s a stupid cover. She should have insisted on better.
SAVE THE KOALAS!
At least she is doing something to add in this world.
all Miranda’s haters here: go to hell or go f*** your self!!!!!
what a sad life you probubly have!!! poor people!!!!!!!
))))))))))))))) : if you dont like her just DONT leave comments here!!!!!!!
good cause i guess, not a big fan of koalas tho, i prefer kangaroos
i dont like her on the cover as well
looks like she has extensions
She isn’t a beauty. She looks awful without make up.
Photoshop much? Anyway, you don’t have to get naked for a cause. She’s so desperate for attention. She probably made thousands of dollars for herself more than help the poor koalas.
shes skinny and ugly ewww.
So are you also against the PETA ads? You know, the ones that a lot of A-listers have posed for….”i’d rather go naked than wear fur”. The ones that have helped put the fur industry out of business? The ones that have brought awareness for decades? Those ads? Or are you only against ANYTHING that Miranda does because of your irrational hatred? Yeah, I thought so.
not poster 45.
I do not care for the PETA ads “i’d rather go naked than wear fur.”
The point, at least for me is, some people do not feel comfortable looking at others who are naked posing the way she is on the cover of a magazine that is visible to themselves or their children at any store that may happen to sell it.
There is a reason why Playboy and Penthouse along with the others are kept in plain brown wrappers behind the counter. So others do not have to see them if they do not want to. And a person must be a certain age to purchase them. Not that it would make much difference in maturity
For me personally it makes your voice far less credible, especially in this case, considering the way they have her posed and the expression on her face. Chained to a tree, naked.
When I used to work at a video store I used to get so sick to stomach every time I had to put away the “adult” videos, which is what this cover looks like.
I am very happy that the PETA ads have put the fur industry out of business….I just do not particular care for the way in which they have done it. Does not matter who the person is who is being photographed.
I do not think it makes them bad people, nor do I feel they were bad people to begin with.
But there are lots of other ways to get the point across. Most who do ads of this sort are comfortable enough in their own skin to do so. Some of us are not. At least I’m strong enough to admit it. Doesn’t mean I consider myself ugly, just modest.
Does not matter who is posing naked sweety. Why don’t you get up there and join her if you think what she is doing is so Noble?
Let me get this straight. You are comparing that picture, to the pictures in Playboy? You’re kidding, right? Please tell me you are kidding. A confidant, strong woman using her body to bring awareness to a cause is, to you, the same as a desperate woman selling her body to make money for big wigs in fancy offices? OMG.
She isn’t showing ANYTHING! She may not be wearing clothes, but she is as covered as she would be on a beach, in a bikini.
The FACT is that posing in this manner, be it for PETA or Save the Rain Forest, or what have you, gets people talking. THAT’S the idea. I bet twice as many people know about the plight of the koala right now, than they did yesterday because Miranda Kerr posed sans clothing. It grabs people’s interest. It works, because it shocks people. It’s just some people are more easily shocked than others.
I do think that her cause is noble. But I don’t think anyone would care if I stripped for a cause. But if my stripping would garner more interest in breast cancer research, I would do it in a heartbeat.
Oh, and by the way, it’s ‘sweetie’.
rolling stones mag has stooped so low
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!