OlderFri, 12 June 2009 at 12:23 am
Sienna Miller is Groucho Grouchy
Sienna Miller leaves the Groucho club in a plaid dress in London, England on Thursday (June 11).
The 27-year-old hottie plays The Baroness in the upcoming film, G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra. An action figure was created for Sienna and she commented on the process, saying, “I got measured in this pod so the doll is exactly to scale - every nook and cranny. They showed me my bald head before it was painted on and it was me! That was weird!”
The film opens this summer on August 7th across the country.
Share This Post:
164 Comments
Maybe Jude just realized what a cold, heartless b i t c h she was and bailed while he could. His life is better for it.
I bet she and Getty are still together but just keeping it under wraps. When It gets blown out that she has lied yet again, the backlash will ruin whatever is left of her career.
I am amaed that she would actually say some of the stupid things she has said. TRAMP!
Jude has not said anything but his friends have hinted that Sienna was unhappy about him spending so much time with his kids that is why he dropped her in October 2006.
She was still talking about how much she loved him and flashing the ring that he gave her till March of 2007 whereupon he had to call her and request that she stop talking about him. She said so in the next interview that she gave but of course, it did not deter her. And now 3 years after, she is still talking about him.
Why not Rhys Ifans, jamie Burke, Matthew Rhys or Balty?
Jazz
Cecause that will not bring her as much PR as talking about Jude….yet again! She sings the Jude hurt me song every time things get rough for her.
tramp!
HAHAHAHA
youstupid (#64)
Just like SM, you see a victory where there is none. Your name calling and insults don’t help SM and they most certainly don’t make you the “winner”. I guess you can’t teach a old dog new tricks because for the umpteenth time “youstupid’s” one and only response to any and all logical arguments is name calling or insults.
Why do SM fans always resort to name calling and insults? Because even they are at a loss for words and can’t identify any redeeming qualities in her? Or are they just upset because someone had the audacity to make them THINK? Or do they just spend so much time fawning over SM “beauty” and “great sense of style” that they have lost the ability to formulate arguments that are not based on their bruised ego? Maybe her fans are just preteens/teens who have no clue how the world outside their fantasy operates, that would explain why they seem to think calling someone a “puppy” means that they have won.
How exactly did SM “f***” with the reunion story? That’s right, SM fans always see a victory where there is none. Just because she says that she is single, doesn’t mean that she actually is. If SM said that the moon revolved around MARS, would you believe that too?
She looks super cute here! Love the outfit and look….and I actually think she has good legs and a very nicely-proportioned body.
…although i do agree that her legs don’t look good in these pics.
She looks odd.
Have anyone seen the video of the paps taking these photos? It’s quite funny. While she’s walking out to the car the paps are all “Hey, you look great”, “Give us a smile” and such - while she looks like the cat that ate the canary - but after she’s gone the paps are looking at their photos saying something like “Are there any good photos?” and the reply is “No, she looks bad in all of them”
Hahahahahaha. And she hates the attention. Right!
Adorable!
She looks like she could star as Bette Davis’ character in “Look what Happened to Baby Jane” in that ridiculous doll’s dress and her tanned, aging face.
Good puppy!! Just admit it puppy, you are drooling over Jude Law. You cannot get over that Sienna touched Jude’s weenie and this fact is killing you. No mental masturbation is going to help you to get over it, you stupid sick puppy.
CINDY
Getty and Miller were seen leaving a Hotel in LA just before she flew to Madrid, a passer-by saw them and put it on Twitters, I would rather believe him than the Mirror or her PR’s
youstupid
You got to love SM fans,” youstupid” is declaring a victory where it doesn’t exist. Thanks for proving that SM fans are her worst enemies. Since you have returned with yet another “Good puppy!! Just admit it puppy” comment, that must mean that you couldn’t find ONE redeeming quality in SM. You could have used this as an opportunity to show us that SM fans can THINK beyond their SM fantasy, but you opted to talk about sex instead. So SM fans are preteens/teens who know nothing about the world. Just because you fantasize about SM and JL together, doesn’t mean that everyone does the same. Since you are the one talking about SM and JL in such a graphic manner, that means that you are sick. BTW, you do realize that JL doesn’t want SM.
Oh, I get it, you are mad because you think people are taking JL side over SM (ie-saying that she shouldn’t have mentioned JL and that she has no right to whine about what he did to her since she is having an affair with the married man). So you are one of those people who thinks that JL was a “bad man” for cheating on your beloved idol? Now that’s puppy behavior. Trying to defend your owner at all costs, even when your responses are irrational and immature.
Puppy behavior is barking (ie-name calling/insults) /lashing out at other posters when they don’t write fluff pieces about SM and her great sense of style. Puppy behavior is thinking that your barking is playful (ie- witty/clever). Puppy behavior is that you don’t see the wrong that your owner does. Since you still haven’t learned from your actions, that would make you an old dog, right?
Speaking of puppies, you would think that SM would have learned by now to stop thrusing her personal life into the public’s eye. Maybe because she isnt a puppy, but just an old dog. How many times is she going to cry wolf before she realizes that no one is running to save her?
Oh wait, I just realized. Youstupid did identify ONE “redeeming quality” in SM. He/she was trying to tell me that SM is a “good person” because she slept with or groped Jude Law. Is that all she is good for, groping the man she is having a booty-call with? That must make SM proud, that her fans define her worth in life by the man she is sleeping with at the time. And of course what she is wearing.
I gotta admit, puppy, I’m having mental orgasms after looking at your mental masturbations. Good puppy.
And I understand your envy. Well, Jude Law is Jude Law. But I can help you, just next time you are going to perform blowj0b for your boyfriend/husband, pretend that it is a Jude’s weenie. Because a weenie is a weenie is a weenie. With your enormous and sick imagination I am sure you will be able to do that in no time. Hope, this is going to help you, poor puppy.
youstupid,
Well if you can’t be right, be an insulting ******* and make adolescent-type sex comments. That’s good enough. It doesn’t controvert on single valid point made about Sienna’s character or lack thereof, but that’s okay.
If these are Sienna’s fans, she can keep them.
Youstupid
With fans like this, SM doesn’t need enemies. You are not being a good puppy because everytime you make a comment, you just end up slapping your owner in the face. I thought that you were supposed to “defend” your owner, and here you are making her look no different than a street walker. So you agree that SM fans think that her only redeeming quality is her ability to spread her legs, give men BJ, and grope them?
No one is envious of SM, her personality is so devoid of substance that her fans think that she is nothing without sex. No wonder you are going on and on about these JL fantasies, you think that SM and JL had this fairytale sexual relationship. Since you are the one talking graphically about sex, that makes you the one with the enormous or sick behavior. I can see that your parents haven’t talked to you about the birds and the bees yet. If they had you wouldn’t be on message board making such comments about sex The sad part is that you really think that these comments make you witty or clever.
“Good puppy” or not, you are not doing your owner any favors by barking at me. If you want to challenge yourself, make a VALID ARGUMENT that doesn’t include “good puppy”, anything about your sexual fantasies, or SM great sense of style. Prove me wrong. Be a good puppy and show us that SM fans can think beyond their fantasy.
Wrong answer, puppy. But I am sure you will thank me for the help, later.
Such a poor thing.
Unless, you don’t have a boyfriend/husband. Oops, then my bad. So, your reality is just a pretty sad place to live. Yeeah, that could explain your rants and your sick imagination. That is sad, indeed.
Youstupid
SM fans must like slapping themselves in the face. Instead of “helping me”, you need to first help yourself. The ability to string together words to form name calling and insults in response to any and all valid arguments isn’t something to be proud of. Before you call someone a “puppy” or “poor thing”, make sure that your bruised ego is out of the way first. Your posts are merely tantrums, you know the ones little kids do when they their mommy’s don’t buy them the candy or toy. All you have proven is that SM fans are preteens/teens who are so caught up in their fantasy world that they can’t identify ONE or even a partial redeeming quality in her.
You can keep barking all you want, but don’t be upset because you keep getting hit with the newspaper or shocked from your collar. Since you still can’t set aside your bruised ego and prove to us that SM fans can THINK, I’ll do you a favor. This isn’t a redeeming quality, but it’s better than coming here day in and day crying about how “people are mistreating SM for no apparant reason”. When SM /others claim that she is a “free spirit” I suspect that they are referring to this disorder. Here are the symptoms and can you guess the disorder? Now, responsing with “good puppy” , a sexual fantasy, or that SM is pretty isn’t the right answer .
The symptoms include:
*Constant seeking of reassurance or approval.
*Excessive dramatics with exaggerated displays of emotions.
*Excessive sensitivity to criticism or disapproval.
*Inappropriately seductive appearance or behavior.
*Excessive concern with physical appearance.
*A need to be the center of attention (self-centeredness).
*Low tolerance for frustration or delayed gratification.
*Rapidly shifting emotional states that may appear shallow to others.
*Opinions are easily influenced by other people, but difficult to back up with details.
*Tendency to believe that relationships are more intimate than they actually are.
*Making rash decisions.
youstupid
No, a pretty sad place to live is YOUR REALITY. In your reality a woman’s worth is defined by the presence of a man. So the only thing you seem to like about SM is the fact that she jumps from man to man without a “time out”. Now that’s sad indeed.
What’s sad indeed is the fact that you can only muster up a name calling or insult. That’s not something to be proud of, especially since you are always barking about how someone is “picking on your beloved owner for no reason at all”. If you are going to rant about “haters”, then you need something more valid then a tantrum about how you think anyone who makes a valid/logical argument about your owner doesn’t have a boyfriend/husband. Wait, you just slapped yourself in the face. Since you are here putting all of your time and energy in barking at me, by your preteen/teen logic you don’t have a boyfriend. See how it works? The word of the day is HYPOCRITE. Look it up.
What sick imagination? YOU are the only one making sexual comments about SM and JL. I understand that you are curiuos about these matters, but a message board isn’t the time nor the place to discuss your sexual fantasies.
That is sad, indeed. It seems my last conjecture was the winner. So, what mother nature did to you? What are you, a 200 lbs perpetual customer of Burgerking? You think that if you slam “pretty” people it will make you feel better, it will help you to forget about your own f***ed up life.
Well, you can slam them all you want but I’ve got news for you, the evolution will take care of you and your posterity. Whether you like it or not. Poor thing, indeed.
youstupid
It’s time to come clean, are you entertaining everyone by imitating SM fans?
youstupid
What’s the saying, if you give them enough rope, eventually they will hang themselves.
So now your example of a redeeming quality is being “pretty”?
So like all SM fans, youstupid is under the impression that being “pretty” means that SM is a good person and exempted from the consequences of her bad behavior. Since he/she thinks that SM is “pretty”, then in her reality it means that he/she is also a good person and exempted from the consequences of his/her actions. Hence why she/he criticizes me for posting on a message board, when he/she is doing the exact same thing.
As demonstrated by post 98, anyone who dislikes SM is “evil, ugly, doesn’t have a boyfriend/husband, fat, poor thing, and has a f**** up life”. This is called splitting and is seen in borderline personality disorder. Thanks youstupid for being the lesson of the day.
SM “beauty” wasn’t enough to keep him from boyfriend from straying. That’s why you are trying to act as if they had a great sex life. If being “pretty”makes SM a good person, then how come NONE of her ex-boyfriends ever have anything nice to say her about her (unless he is promoting EOL)? If being “pretty” exempts her from the bad behavior, then how come there is this massive attempt to whitewash her image? So in the REAL WORLD it’s not enough to be just pretty, there has to be something behind it.
This is the favorite part of your post: “Well, you can slam them all you want but I’ve got news for you, the evolution will take care of you and your posterity. Whether you like it or not. Poor thing, indeed.”
Here’s the flaw your logic: SM is 27yo looks worn out, old, and used up; so does that mean “evolution took care of her posterity” because of all of her UGLY behavior? It takes a truly miserable and sad person to go after a married man. SM life must really be messed up if she can only feel good about herself when she encourages a married man to betray the woman who gave his kids birth.
How exactly did you win? You still haven’t identified a valid redeeming quality in SM, your one and only response is name calling, and your argument is built on the notion that only “ugly , fat, old, miserable, and single” people dislike SM. Little kids can do better than this, even they can give valid reasoning to support their arguments. So why is it so hard for you?
I take it you couldn’t guess what the disorder is?
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!