OlderSienna Miller Covers Vogue July 2009
Sienna Miller is red hot in a Calvin Klein Collection custom azalea silk single-shoulder dress on the July 2009 cover of Vogue. Here are some choice quotes:
On never being on a real date: “I’ve actually never been taken on a date in my whole life. I have never had a one-night stand. I’m a real relationship person — contrary to public perception…I get kind of emotionally involved very quickly, and I’m not going to spend time with someone unless I love them. But it’s not hard for me to fall in love.”
On watching herself in The Mysteries of Pittsburgh, which she filmed in 2006: “I don’t think I feel comfortable getting naked now. I can see where I made the decision to make that film three years ago, but then you grow up and evolve and your tastes change. I was in this period where I was making movies back-to-back because I didn’t want to be at home. Anything to not be in London. I was running away (from the Jude Law situation). Seeing that film felt like a few steps back.”
On Jude cheating on her during “Nannygate”: “It’s dangerous to bring this up. I talked about him in an interview not long ago, saying that I still love him, and he was like, ‘Please stop talking about it.’ (laughs) This was going to be the first interview where I was going to try to be guarded and detached, not give anything away, and actually I realize that it’s irrelevant. You have to be yourself.…That was a very pivotal time in my life, and I’m happy saying that. It’s a private moment when you get your heart broken for the first time, and that was the absolute antithesis of private. (laughs) It couldn’t have been more public! I had people on the street being like, ‘Ang in there, loov!’ and all you want to do is crawl into a cave and weep for a week. (pauses) I think I discovered a whole new emotional depth that I didn’t have access to before. When you have your heart broken for the first time, you gain depth, and that’s why actors tend to get better with age, I think.”
Read the full feature at Vogue.com.
Share This Post:
237 Comments
star
unless your one of Siennas relatives or its a personal matter.
ym
I’ve lived more years than you and I’ve never behaved like she has. And I will never never never never have sex with a man who is married to anyone but me. End of discussion.
And this is an opinion board. We are giving opinions. We judge each other every day, all of the time. What do you think job interviews, courts, and beauty contests are for? You judge her to be beautiful, which is subjective and relative. I judge her behavior to be terrible. Same thing. You are just judging a quality over which she had no input or control. I judge her actions and words, which are the the only things she can control. Very different.
I judge you to be badly in need of grammar lessons. You are =you’re
so shut up about the young thing. You’re the one who is talking like a twelve-year-old.
like I said, Ill give you that your just young. and hot in the head.
By that same logic, who gave SM the right to judge RG and her 4 kids? Because that is what she did everytime she stepped out with RG husband and then spread lies about this woman to justify her actions with her husband. Who gave SM the right to judge JL nanny? Because that’s what she did when she publicly made that threat against her. Or better yet, who gave her the right to judge Jude Law? Because that is what she did and still does everytime she whines about how he betrayed her, despite the fact that she spent the majority of 2008 and some of 2009 shacked up with a married man.
At some point SM and her fans are going to have to acknowledge that SIENNA MILLER (not the people who comment on her bad behavior nor the media/press who in SM eyes has committed a crime by not cleaning up her “mistakes”) is responsible for her own actions. If she doesn’t like what people are saying, then she should change what she puts out there. She should not give interviews talking about how she can’t be held accountable for her actions because she “falls in love easily”. BTW, where is SM remorse?
take a look at #126, hot-head.
to A and sheryl
Thanks for the explanation about the calendar, i had no idea it exist.
Didnt have a clue supermodels like Heidi Klum and Gisele Bundchen posed for it as well.
I saw the links you posted and i think the pics are a bit tacky, even if its considered” high fashion”. But im sure guys love them lol…. Not here to judge anyway!
1) “Do as I say, but not as I do”: So by your logic it’s okay for SM and her fans to judge a mother and her 4 kids, Jude Law, JL nanny, the media/press, and other women; however, it is not okay when people comment on her bad behavior. Where is SM accountability? Where is SM remorse? While it’s okay for SM fans to post on a message board, it is not okay for those who won’t glorify SM. People who could care less wouldn’t be here trying to shame other posters or calling others “hot-heads” for talking about SM hypocricy or tendency to court attention.
2) You cited a reference from the Bible. There is also a reference that says don’t let your right hand know what your left hand is doing. If SM and her fans don’t want people commenting on her business, then she should STOP TALKING ABOUT HER PERSONAL LIFE AND STOP PLAYING THE VICTIM. But it’s not the fact that people are commenting that bothers you; it’s the fact that they are NOT IGNORING her bad behavior and are not fawning over her “great sense of style” or “beauty” that has you in an uproar.
3) Why is it that the only means of “defending” SM always begins or ends with name calling/insults, trying to shame other posters (ie-the “you are all horrible people for juding poor, helpless, angelic SM” mentality), or something about her physical appearance. When you resort to name calling you are just telling everyone that SM is not worthy. SM is only worthy of name calling, no wonder she piggy-backs off of others. Her fans are too worried about all the wrong things.
4) Your argument about people “picking on SM for no apparant reason” would be valid if she had shown some remorse, for once in her ADULT life own up to her actions, didn’t stage photo-op after photo-op with the married man, didn’t spread lies about his wife, didn’t play the eternal victim, and hadn’t popped up in LA when there were reports of BG trying to reconcile with his wife.
” Nobody ever did, or ever will, escape the consequences of his choices.” -Alfred M
“It is easy to dodge our responsibility, but we cannot dodge the consequences of doding our responsibilities”-Josiah C Stamp
:-)))) omg never thought reading gossip blogs could be so revealing.
so by your tractate I assume your one of the participants or relatives of the participants of those perturbations. or you just read about them on this website?
Jesus some people dont seem to have a job and dedicate their time to insult this woman on blogs 24/7 REALLY DISTURBING
kk (aka ym) -Why do SM fans post under “different” names to make it look like others agree with them? Did you think that no would notice that kk just so happened to pop up out the blue just as “ym” is “lurking”. Coincidence, I think not. But keep posting because you give yourself away everytime.
1) Your assertion is that people who comment on SM bad behavior don’t have a job and that some posters are here 24/7. And you think that it is disturbing that people would be commenting on a message board.
2) FACT: You are here dedicating you time and energy on this message board “defending SM” (via name calling and insults)/commenting about other posters.
3) CONCLUSION: Since you are here posting on this board, then that means that you don’t have a job and that your behavior is disturbing. The truth of the matter is that you wouldn’t be here posting in the first place if you cared less. If you think that people are here posting 24/7, then by that logic that means that you are also here posting 24/7 and and reading everyone’s post 24/7.
4) Thanks for slapping yourself in the face.
What is disturbing are those people who come to message boards criticizing others for posting when they are doing the exact same thing; those people who seem to think people are “insulting SM” because they won’t employ the “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” mentality because SM is “pretty”; publilcy helping a married betray/humilate his wife and 4 kids; and whining about her pain as she reaps havoc in the lives of 5 people.
whats the point of me using other names? I already said I know nothing about Sienna and dont care.
but Ill repeat my post which you conveniently skipped.
:-)))) omg never thought reading gossip blogs could be so revealing.
so by your tractate I assume your one of the participants or relatives of the participants of those perturbations. or you just read about them on this website?
whats the point of me using other names? I already said I know nothing about Sienna and dont care.
but Ill repeat my post which you conveniently skipped.
:-)))) omg never thought reading gossip blogs could be so revealing.
so by your tractate I assume your one of the participants or relatives of the participants of those perturbations. or you just read about them on this website?
whats the point of me using other names? I already said I know nothing about Sienna and dont care.
but Ill repeat my post which you conveniently skipped.
:-)))) omg never thought reading gossip blogs could be so revealing.
so by your tractate I assume your one of the participants or relatives of the participants of those perturbations. or you just read about them on this webs
ym
what’s the point of posting the same thing 3 times? It’s still illiterate. You care enough to post as much as anybody else here.
She’s a ****** ho who chases married men and then whines about. You are =you’re an idiot.
BTW I have a job and a good one at that. One that requires spelling.
deanna,
I agree. I don’t care if that is on the cover of the Pope’s Christmas card, it’s still sleazy as hell. She looks way too comfortable spread eagle at a dinner table. Bleh!
Yes, YM, that’s a judgment.
ym (aka kk) posts 134, 137-139
The fact that you keep screaming that you know nothing about SM is a RED FLAG. It tells everyone that you are a SM fan who is upset because you can’t get people to bend to your will. Posting your response 3 times isn’t going to validate your response or make people believe that you are not posting under different names. It’s comparable to when a kid starts kicking and screaming because his mommy didn’t buy him the candy or toy. I see that you learned two more words. The words you should be studying is COMPASSION and EMPATHY.
We know that you are a SM fan because you employ the basic princles:
1) “Do as I say, not as I do”: Operate under the impression that they do not have to abide by the standards they they impose on others. They will sit here and criticize others for writing on a message board “24/7″ and when they are doing the same thing. When the woman who stepped down from SM fansite wrote her piece about how she disliked SM antics with a married man, did you call her a hater, disturbed, or think that she was “insulting” SM or had no right to judge her? You know it’s bad when her own fans call her out for her bad behavior. It just goes to show that in the REAL WORLD ADULTS are responsible for their actions.
2) “See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil”: Nothing that SM does is ever wrong. The evidence is in his/her face, yet he/she insist that people are picking on SM for no apprant reason.
3) “Out of site, out of mind”: Don’t show any compassion/sympathy for RG and her 4 kids because they don’t see them suffering or Sm “sources” didn’t say that they were suffering.
4) “Passing the buck”: No matter what SM does, she is never, ever at fault. The public is to blame because they comment on SM; the media is to blame just because SM says so; and RG and her kids are to blame because the public has more sympathy for them than they do for SM. Who/what haven’t they used as a scapegoat? SM house? Oh wait her house is at fault because it’s a house and not a fairytale castle.
5) “Im neutral or could care less”: Then the said poster goes on to make personal attacks against other posters or shame them because they are posting on the message board. If they could care less then they wouldn’t be here in the first place.
6) Name calling and insults: If you are going to use name calling and insults, then at least have ONE OR TWO valid arguments in support of SM(that is not based on her physicail appearance); otherwise your posts are nothing more than tantrums. The name calling and insutls makes it look like you are trying to save face; like those people who when fired say “you can’t fire me because I quit.”
7) When in panic mode, they use “different” names. For some odd reason, they think that this will validate their post and make it look like SM has a mass army of fans. So when X is running out of steam, Z shows up to pat him on the back or reinforce what x is saying. It always amazes me how he/she thinks that no one would know the difference.
8) Think that being “pretty” exempts SM from the consequences of her actions. Hence why he/she is making a fuss over people “juding” SM and can’t understand why anyone would be appalled by her behavior.
Probably when she stop talking about Jude Law because his new success (now with Hamlet), making him appears like a predator, a bad person, then Jude’s fans stop posting about her. What is the problem with be a JL fan? he made a mistake, he apologies (i never see an apologies of sienna for Rhys, Rossetta, dave Neville, etc……………….) and move on and she is still talking about that. She just need press because she has to sell a movie and a play and be just SM is not enough. She is sad, a spoiled woman who wants to be a girl at 27!!! Come on! Go on Sheryl!
ym (aka kk)
Because in the REAL WORLD adults are never, ever responsible for their actions. If they wake up on a Monday and they don’t want to take responsibility for their actions, then they can just assign someone else to carry their burdens. What a world we live in when RESPONSIBILITY and ACCOUNTABILITY don’t exist. That’s the goal in life, to dodge the consequences of out actions. (sarcasm)
hey you all, boss orange perfum smells delicious!
Not saying it because of sienna miller but it really smells great
you need to see a shrink c, i have nothing against you but do you really think your behavior is normal? Its not even about your obviously revulsion against sienna which i totally respect because you have the right to have a point of view just like everyone else but you seem to be obssesed with sienna and the fact that she slept with a married guy, as i woman i understand you but why come here and argue with people who dont share ur thoughts over and over? and even say we use different names to defend sienna? seriously, i dont need to defend a person i dont know. Its your behaviour thats concerning
just to make myself clear this is not about sienna or her behaviour. Its about yours
to star
i agree too, those pictures are really classless but she is always topless in every movie, photo, yacht ( with BG) LOL. So why should we be surprised?
again hot-head c you ignored my reply, how convenient, try to explain this obvious and simple fact about your exceptional reasoning:
________________________________________________________
so by your tractate I assume your one of the participants or relatives of the participants of those perturbations. or you just read about them on this website?
star ” You are =you’re an idiot.”
___________________________________
your a horrid human being.
Pages: « 1 … 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 … 10 » Show All
Comment and Share!
E-mail to a Friend or share on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and more!