Katie Holmes & Suri Cruise: Lion King on Broadway!

  0

I like her high heels.

  0

First we discover Suri’s still drinking from a bottle (horrible for the teeth) and now it appears that Suri in high heels was not just a one time thing. She’s walking everywhere in them, and on cement, too. Are they not content to just wreck her teeth? Are they trying to destroy her feet as well? What’s wrong with Katie Holmes? What a nut job to allow this foolishness.

  0

@ 11/08/2009 at 2:09 am From Marc Headley aka “blownforgood”
:

Well, Tom needed a girl and between Dave Miscavige and him, they were not coming up with anything workable, so — time to bring in the expert. Greg Wilhere was brought in for this job again. He had done it before, he just needed to qualify the girl a bit better this time.

It was agreed that they needed a foxy Scientologist that was on purpose, in ethics, yadda yadda blah blah. They set-up an audition unit at CC int that called in just about every Scientology actress anywhere under the sun, moon and stars. The “audition” was for a possible part in a Tom Cruise movie and several personal questions were asked about the person and what they thought of Tom, Scientology etc.

Video tapes would get made daily of the auditions and sent up to Dave to review. This went on for weeks. Well, it turns out that no girl in Scientology was good enough for Tom. All auditions were rejected. They would need to fish outside the pond for this one.
-

Plan B - Who do you want? This was the question Dave asked him. If you could have any girl, which one would you want? We will make her a Scientologist!

Well Tom Cruise wanted one girl more than any other - Jennifer Garner.

“How do we get to Jennifer Garner? Somebody who knows Jennifer? Good idea - who do we know that knows Jennifer? JJ Abrams!!! He does the Alias shows with her. Let’s have him do a project! We already have a director for the next Mission Impossible instalment, damn! I’ve got it, we will fire the current director that is contracted to do the movie and get JJ on board. Once JJ is on board we will get Jennifer on board and that’s it -we have her!”

So once JJ Abrams is on board, Tom finds out from JJ that Jennifer Garner has a big thing for tigers. Tom figures this is a sure way to get her. What does he do, he buys here a freakin’ tiger. Not a tiger skin, not a tiger stuffed animal toy, a real live freakin’ TIGER in a cage and all.

Jennifer is so freaked out that she thinks Tom is nuts! Turns out the tiger was not the best idea.
-
Who is next on the wish list? Scarlett Johansson!

We all know about that story. One meeting at CC Int and she was history.

Awesome factoid: Scarlett did not star in MI:3 because she was shooting another movie - The Island - which just happened to star the same actor that supposedly boned down on Tom’s last wife! Karma baby! Damn that dude is out to get Tom!
-
Okay, Greg Wilhere is now flying back and forth between LA and New York interviewing actresses and trying to get Tom some tail. Somehow Katie Holmes ends up on the list and the rest is history.

Now hear is the part that baffles all logic and only Tom, Katie and Tom’s lawyer know the truth behind this. If Tom cannot have kids with Mimi Rogers who now has two kids from a latter marriage, and Tom cannot have kids with Nicole whose pregnancy was reason for their divorce, then how does he manage to get Katie Holmes pregnant 2 hours into their relationship?????

Maybe the kid that Nicole was carrying was Tom’s!!! But she was really sleeping around and could not deny it. Either way, all the stress killed the baby and we will never know.

So that brings us to the current situation. Is Nicole up in arms because the kids are basically turning into Scientologists anyway. What does she have to lose?

And where the hell did Suri come from? That is a damn good question.
-

Marc Headley aka “blownforgood”
http://www.xenu-directory.net/accounts/blownforgood.html#Nicole_Scientology_and_getting_Tom_some_tail

  0

#7 why?

  0

Whatever you think of Suri Cruise, I think it’s really distasteful to publish photos where can see her underwear. She is a little girl and it’s just not right. At least crop the photo if you feel you need to show her crying.

  0

Yes, she still drinks from a bottle… and that little Garner troll still wears diapers at 4 years old~!! It is clear that these celeb women (and men) make horrible parents, disciplinarians, etc. They are just producing more self-indulgent, arrogant, egotistical people like themselves and turning them out into the world probably to end up like most celeb children, spoiled, drug addicts, etc.

“sigh”

  0

No socks, and heels… terrible.

  0

She is very cute and seems happy in some of the photos. As a child she is bound to be cranky and cry sometimes.

  0

It is sexualizing a small child to put her in heels and fancy, adult dresse. No socks like normal parents put on their child. This child is being sexualized. Katies does not dress her like a child.

And for her to turn the child’s butt to the camera and let them get that crotch shot of her panties is just disgusting.

  0

Jared, please take down the photo showing Suri’s underwear or at least blur it. As mentioned above, it’s very distasteful and an invasion of her privacy. Also, I’d hate to see pedophiles get their hands on something like this.

  0

This child looks as an old woman!! that is bizarre.

  0

Desperate & Awkward. As always